tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post5281721737907986168..comments2023-10-31T06:31:41.395-04:00Comments on Bottom of the Barrel: ...Our Pets' Heads are Falling Off!: Week 4Bengoodfellahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09401971573776672570noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-43419244640980405102012-10-03T14:06:40.520-04:002012-10-03T14:06:40.520-04:00Koleslaw, either option doesn't sound very goo...Koleslaw, either option doesn't sound very good. Ex-backup QB Punt Protector Jets at least gives Jets fans the illusion of hope, but once they pull Sanchez for him, the genie is out of the bottle. Unless Ex-backup QB Punt Protector Jets plays incredibly poorly, Sanchez would have a hard time getting back in the lineup. <br /><br />It's the illusion of hope aspect of it and I see the Jets going to it after the upcoming loss to the Texans or maybe the week after that. I see them using Tebow for 15 plays this weekend though. Bengoodfellahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09401971573776672570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-73602542753755430692012-10-03T11:13:21.392-04:002012-10-03T11:13:21.392-04:00Lewis Black has said, "Our current two-party ...Lewis Black has said, "Our current two-party system is a bowl of shit looking in the mirror at itself."<br /><br />That's kinda how I feel about the Jets' QB situation. I think if you put Sanchez on a team that has people who can block for him and people for him to throw to, he could have some pretty good games. Now with Holmes out, you might as well start Backup Jets QB/Punt Protector. He can not throw the ball to their non-existent WRs just as well as Sanchez.Koleslawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07125335173783188290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-86256340872990401102012-10-02T08:59:14.863-04:002012-10-02T08:59:14.863-04:00Drekkan85, as far as I know CenturyLink Field is a...Drekkan85, as far as I know CenturyLink Field is a huge advantage. It is loud in there and the Seahawks do seem to play better at home. I know the fans there call themselves "the 12th man" because of the effect they have on opposing teams. <br /><br />If I were an NFL owner I would want to set up my field so that I maximize the value of the seats and make money, but to also have a huge homefield advantage in the acoustics and noise the opposing team can hear. That's just me though and it is probably hard to do both. I know some Redskins fans long for the old RFK stadium because they feel FedEx Field isn't loud enough and the fans don't feel like they are as much a part of the game. Bengoodfellahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09401971573776672570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-32804536027766431312012-10-02T07:45:30.740-04:002012-10-02T07:45:30.740-04:00My own personal take on the Jags is that when I...My own personal take on the Jags is that when I'm using rotating fantasy defences, and I rotate to "Whatever team is facing the Jags this week"... that's a sign.<br /><br />A somewhat unrelated question - but looking at that Rams/Seahawks game - is there a more multiple-personality team in the league than Seattle? At home they seem utterly dominant, as soon as they enter another stadium they seem completely pedestrian.Is that stadium really SUCH a homefield advantage?<br /><br />I ask because if it is I think JJ and just about every other owner who's built a stadium since Seattle's was built is a moron. I think Seattle's shown the importance of noise to a team and establishing home-field advantage. You'd think task one is "How do I acoustically design this place to echo sound and be as loud as humanely possible?" I know they have other goals (like making money), but you don't make money as a football team by losing games (see Jaguars, Jacksonville).Drekkan85noreply@blogger.com