tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post6651607415659530933..comments2023-10-31T06:31:41.395-04:00Comments on Bottom of the Barrel: MMQB Review: Richie Incognito Just Loves Jonathan Martin So Much, That's Why He Treats Him So Bad EditionBengoodfellahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09401971573776672570noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-14915632847125711372013-11-13T14:35:07.093-05:002013-11-13T14:35:07.093-05:00Anon, my dog couldn't walk and was getting des...Anon, my dog couldn't walk and was getting destroyed everyday by my parent's other dog that wanted to play. I was at college so I don't know if it was the right decision even now since I wasn't around to make the decision. <br /><br />In Peter's case, there has to have been more circumstances he chose not to share with us, because the decision to put Bailey down seemed fairly quick. I'm guessing the vet told them previously there wasn't much more that could be done. I hate making the decisions on animals like that and I haven't ever had to make it fortunately. I would probably rather kill a human than an animal. Bengoodfellahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09401971573776672570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-83251132449581398722013-11-13T11:39:08.688-05:002013-11-13T11:39:08.688-05:00As for dogs, my family recently put down my first ...As for dogs, my family recently put down my first dog after she had been paralyzed for several months. She initially came down with a limp that progressively worsened until she could no longer walk. The vet told us to put her down immediately, citing "quality of life". Except she was largely the same dog, almost never in pain, and her only limitation was her legs. We kept her alive for another five months, and she did fine. It was the right decision. Eventually, her body began to fail her and she began to lose interest in food, so we knew it was time, but she was barely a burden to take care of with her paralyzed legs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-51190786879324266152013-11-13T08:25:37.296-05:002013-11-13T08:25:37.296-05:00Snarf, that's a good point. The CBA is suppose...Snarf, that's a good point. The CBA is supposed to outline the agreement between the NFL and the players. I'm sure there is some language in there about the relationship between player and player. I'm not sure if the defined relationship between players would be in the CBA or not. Bengoodfellahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09401971573776672570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102327997051254703.post-12512147469741899142013-11-12T16:51:16.143-05:002013-11-12T16:51:16.143-05:00“The NFL-NFLPA CBA has 127,112 words. Bully, bully...<b>“The NFL-NFLPA CBA has 127,112 words. Bully, bullying, haze, hazing, harassment, steal, extort are none of them. #JonathanMartin #Incognito” <br /><br />—@McCannSportsLaw, Michael McCann, SI legal analyst, Massachusetts lawyer and University of New Hampshire professor.</b><br /><br /><i>It seems both the NFL and NFLPA assumed that NFL players were adults who could leave the high school bullshit behind. It seems they were both wrong.</i><br /><br />Also, isn't the CBA meant to specifically outline the relationship between players and the league, rather than players with other players?Snarfnoreply@blogger.com