Last week Peter King gave us information after his first tour of NFL training camps. He also chastised AJ Smith, the GM of the Chargers, for not re-signing Marcus McNeill and Vincent Jackson. Peter informed us that Brandon Marshall is a completely different and responsible person now that he has that terrible ex-girlfriend out of his life who caused all of his problems. Way to take responsibility for your actions Brandon.
This week, Peter talks a little bit about the Hall of Fame and continues his updates on the training camp tours around the NFL. He tells us all about Nate Kaeding's personal problems and describes how deeply in denial the owner of the Texans truly is.
In this week's edition of MMQB Goes to Summer Camp:
Sam Bradford aces his first test.
Seriously, he aced his first test ever. He never had to take an exam or test at Oklahoma. Someone else always took the exams for him. Not this time though.
What test did Bradford ace? The test Bradford aced was his driver's test. Congrats Sam!
Nate Kaeding sees a shrink.
I am sure he wanted you to make that public.
The Texans back Brian Cushing, and give a reason (excuse?) why he tested PED-positive.
Denial.
The Most Valuable Coach on the Chicago staff this year? Not Mike Martz. Not Lovie Smith. Give you a clue: He bears a slight resemblance to Mike Stivic from All in the Family.
Oh...is the answer Jodie Sweetin? Wait, what are we talking about again?
On the Rams sideline Saturday night, during the club's first scrimmage of the summer, at woody Lindenwood University, all eyes were, of course, on rookie quarterback Sam Bradford, the first pick of the 2010 draft. "What's uncanny,'' said GM Billy Devaney, "is how he doesn't just complete the pass. He completes the pass most often where his guy can get it and the defender can't. Drives the corners crazy.''
What's also crazy is that the Rams have really, really shitty corners. Ron Bartell (okay, he isn't terrible), Bradley Fletcher, Jerome Murphy, and Kevin Dockery. I hate to be down on them because it is so easy to do, but it is not like Sam Bradford is going against the Jets defense in practice.
But when you've lost 42 of your last 48 games, and your passing game is probably the biggest reason why, you want any hope you can find. And in St. Louis, hope is spelled B-R-A-D-F-O-R-D.
I have always found it deeply interesting when a team gets excited that their defense is getting killed by their own quarterback in training camp. It is exciting to have a quarterback who can throw the ball well, but it also doesn't say a lot for the defense of the team. So it is sort of an exciting solution and a problem. Does Bradford just suck less than the defense of the Rams does? He's a rookie quarterback and is destroying the defense in practice. That can't be good for the Rams secondary.
You have to have a little perspective over what happened here Saturday night. On the first throw of third-string quarterback Keith Null's night, he rainbowed a bomb over corner Kevin Dockery to an undrafted free agent, Brandon McRae. The cornerback group, other than Bartell (Larry Fitzgerald calls playing Bartell his tough Sunday in the division), is a weak one, with injuries sidelining a couple of the presumptive members of the final roster.
It's so irritating when sportswriters do shit like this. Peter King goes bananas over Sam Bradford and titles this part of MMQB "This is not the second coming of JaMarcus Russell" and tells us all how Bradford is playing so well. Then he tells US to keep some perspective because the cornerbacks for the Rams aren't very good. No, no, no...YOU keep perspective because you are the one talking about great Bradford is playing. We are just reading what you write about Bradford and how great he will be.
Don't describe to your readers about how great a player will be and fawn over him and then tell your readers to keep perspective because he is not playing against great competition. You are the one telling us how great Bradford will be, so our perspective is based on hearing what you have to say about Bradford. Peter King frames our perspective with his descriptions of Bradford's practice exploits, so he needs to be the one to remember what kind of cornerback group Bradford is throwing against. Don't treat your readers like little school children who are learning the wrong things in school while you are the person supposed to be teaching those things to us.
"So far he's been the perfect package,'' Bartell said. Key words: so far. But it's easy to be optimistic about the Rams for the first time in a while, watching this kid.
That's fine to say, but Peter's readers aren't idiots. The bottom line is that Peter writes several paragraphs about how accurate Bradford is and then tries to talk down to his readers by acting like we are the ones giddy with excitement over the future of the Rams and Bradford. I would have had no problem with Peter saying "I" need some perspective because he is the one reporting on Bradford's exploits.
Yeah, I am a little touchy today.
The owner of the Houston Texans, Bob McNair, told me he believes his young linebacker, reigning NFL defensive rookie of the year Brian Cushing, is not guilty of taking a performance-enhancer called hCG.
"My son would never take drugs! There's no way he would do that because that's not how we raised him. Quit hurling false accusations at the ones I love."
Bob McNair sounds like a parent and how many times have we all heard this from a parent?
In an interview here Friday, Cushing said he thinks he knows why he tested positive for elevated levels of hCG. "Everything points to that overtrained athlete syndrome,'' Cushing said, walking back to the Texans' locker room after their afternoon practice. "I'm pretty sure it is. I'm pretty positive. I didn't take anything. It's not a tainted supplement. So all roads lead to that.
There is another more obvious solution. Perhaps Cushing took a PED of some kind. I know it may seem shocking he did this, especially since the NFL is clean due to the drug testing that goes on...but it is possible since he tested positive for a PED.
The syndrome results from athletes training intensely for a long period, with the possibility of a testosterone imbalance resulting when an athlete stops training. I must stress the word "possibility,'' because no player in the history of the NFL substance-abuse program before Cushing tested positive for the higher level of hCG.
Cushing is the only NFL athlete to ever have this syndrome and test positive for hCG. This is what he wants us to believe.
Rumors of steroid use have dogged Cushing since his high-school days in New Jersey, and followed him to USC. Despite the evidence against him, Cushing has denied that he took hCG. And Friday, his employer agreed.
I've seen guys work out and gain muscle mass without steroids. I've seen guys work out and use some sort of steroid. I am not stupid and I know the difference.
These pictures of Cushing before and after he supposedly used steroids. It's suspicious. I know the article linked is from Bleacher Report, which is like a sports tabloid, but they are pictures that don't appear to be doctored so I don't think they can be too misleading.
"He shows no sign of ever having been on steroids,'' McNair said. "His weight hasn't changed appreciably since he's been with us. I've looked into it pretty thoroughly, and I haven't found anything that would lead me to believe that he has ever taken a performance-enhancing drug.''
Maybe he didn't use a PED. Maybe he did. I don't think weight is the big issue here, but what Cushing looks like and the fact he has a positive PED test are probably more important information right now.
But I know that the quickest way to answer all of this is by production on the field,'' Cushing said.
No. The quickest way to answer this is to provide actual scientific reasoning as to why the positive test was positive that doesn't sound like an excuse. Cushing's production on the field was great last year and that didn't really make me think he was clean. In fact, his great production actually ended up hurting him in some ways among people who use his production as proof he wasn't playing clean.
I expect Cushing to come back possessed. We all do. Whether there's anything to this latest wrinkle is something I'll be following up on in the coming days, but the only way fans will look at Cushing as a great player is if he stays clean. For years..
The truth is that no one really cares if Cushing is clean or not. Julius Peppers failed a test his 1st year in the NFL and no one remembers that.
The most efficient kicker in NFL history is consulting with a sports psychologist for his failings. Nate Kaeding, who had previously seen a mental-health professional to help with his mindset and found it helpful, has seen the guy "about six'' times this offseason, he told me, to help him deal with the aftermath of a head-case performance in the Chargers' three-point divisional playoff loss to the Jets at home Jan. 17.
(Nate Kaeding) "Please don't tell everyone I am seeing a shrink. Please Peter?"
(Peter King ignoring Kaeding and getting a phone call) "Hey Brett, it's ol' Petey who called you 12 times yesterday! How you doing? How's Breleigh and Deanna? (looks at Kaeding and yells 'Talk to you later' as he walks away) You still need help unloading some of that mulch Brett? I'm just a thousand miles away from you, I'll hop a flight and be there this afternoon."
And the fact that Kaeding can't make it right today or tomorrow is probably the worst part. It's going to eat at him until January, and there won't be a player in the NFL with more pressure on him entering the playoffs (if the Chargers make it) than Kaeding.
"Quite honestly, it still bugs the crap out of me,'' he said.
I hate to say this, but it sounds to me like Kaeding is done psychologically. He is going to be thinking about those kicks for a while until he can redeem himself...and then will he be trying not to miss the next crucial kick or will he be trying to make the kick? If he is trying not to miss the kick, then that doesn't bode well for his NFL future.Goodell and Madden got perspectives from players and coaches on, among other things, the 18-game-schedule proposal, the new player safety initiatives (about new helmets and the prospect of making pads mandatory), and what to do about the program of never-ending offseason workouts that have evolved in the league. "Clearly there's a cultural change going on,'' Goodell said, referring to the players' increasing awareness of the long-term effects of head injuries.
What Goodell actually meant was, "clearly the players have figured out that hitting other players as hard as you can could cause some short-term and long-term brain problems. The NFL has known this for years, but didn't want to tell anyone for fear the players would find out."
In Washington, DeAngelo Hall blistered Goodell after he left, telling the local press: "He just wants to say that the owners are over here, the players are over here and I'm in the middle, I'm for the game. But to ask him a question about anything, he couldn't answer,'' Hall said. "...We sat there and shot questions at him for 45 minutes, and pushed meetings back, and had to be here longer for nothing. A total waste of time.''
There's going to be a lockout and there isn't much anyone can do about it. I think I have accepted this and it doesn't make me very happy either.
The Tampa Bay management is getting creamed locally for not spending money -- the prevailing theory is that the massive financial problem of the Glazers, who own the Bucs, with British football power Manchester United is siphoning money from the operation of the Bucs -- but I get the strong impression Tampa Bay wouldn't have spent in free agency this year anyway. "We want to build a team through the draft and keep it intact,'' Dominik said. "Like Tony said when he coached: 'I don't want a revolving door. I want to show loyalty to the guys we brought in and build a team the right way.' That's the way Raheem and I are operating now. Now, with two draft classes, I think we're on our way.''
I think Tampa Bay is on the right track. My only issue is that I can't recall a time when building through the draft, drafting well and only spending free agent money on quality players was a bad idea. This isn't a new thing. Good teams draft well and use free agency as a way to build weak spots on the team, not as a way to build the entire team.
It's easier said than done, but drafting well and being smart with money is (in my opinion) the best way to build a team, yet somehow it seems so patient and smart when a team actually does it. It sort of makes me wonder why it is somewhat novel for a team to build through the draft.
Watching Leinart practice, the one thing that's apparent is he doesn't have the accuracy Warner did. Warner was a 65-percent passer in his five Arizona seasons; Leinart, in 29 career games, has completed 57 percent. Watching him last Thursday, he threw a couple in a row slightly behind Steve Breaston, then a low fastball to the ground to Early Doucet.
Leinart may have looked like Joe Montana if he could throw against the Rams defensive backs in practice. Therein lies the problem of judging a quarterback against his own defense.
But he also made two nice deep throws to Larry Fitzgerald.
I think I could make a few good throws to Larry Fitzgerald. There is only so much you can judge a quarterback on when he can't get sacked by rushers and is going up against his own team's defense.
We'll see how good in a relatively friendly September schedule (at St. Louis, at Atlanta, Oakland), against no killer pass-rushes.
Just last week Peter King said this about the Falcons defense:
I wonder: Is there a contender with more young, important players? Matt Ryan, 25, and middle linebacker Curtis Lofton, 23, are the offensive and defensive signal-callers. Thomas DeCoud and William Moore are the longterm safeties, in all likelihood; both 25. Kroy Biermann and Lawrence Sidbury could be the defensive ends of the future; they're 24. Peria Jerry and Sean Weatherspoon, both front-seven building blocks, are 25 and 22, respectively. Longterm left tackle Sam Baker is 25. And on and on.
I watched the morning practice with GM Thomas Dimitroff, and at one point, we watched the 6-2, 205-pound hitter, DeCoud, fly by. Last year, he middle-blitzed and sacked Drew Brees, and the Falcons are going to try to send him and others from odd spots like that to vary what offenses see.
Sept 9th can't get here fast enough! I still voice my opinion that the NFL should have a Game on Friday too. 1 on Thursday, 1 on Friday, Sat for College, Sunday, 2 on Monday....that's doing it right!
ReplyDeleteHere's the thing about training camp: If your QB does well it doesn't really mean anything.
ReplyDelete1. No pass rush. When you're not worried about 350 pound D-linemen or 250 pound LBs crashing into you at full speed, you tend to play better, especially when you're an injury prone and mentally weak QB like Bradford.
2. A lot of what makes DB play is the physical aspect: jamming at the line, subtle bumps when the ball is in the air, etc. Most of the physical aspect disappears since no one wants to get hurt in TC. This is another huge advantage to the offense.
3. If your a team like the Rams, you may even tell your DBs to lay off a bit. Let the rookie QB get his confidence up and find your receivers. As bad as that group of DBs is, the four guys you listed are clearly the starters. Look at the Rams' WRs though; Avery has one starting job locked up, but other than that... nothing. So the defensive depth chart is pretty much set, the offensive side is up in the air. If your defense kicks the crap out of the offense, then you don't get particularly good indications on who is better.
4. What the fuck is the GM who just gave out the richest rookie contract ever going to say about the rookie? "We got him into camp and boy does he suck. Sorry about pissing away that money"? No, he's going to talk about how awesome he is and how he's going to lead the team to greatness.
5. Kevin Dockery couldn't start over Aaron Ross or Corey Webster. He sucks. Most of his time in NY was spent with his thumb up his ass. Like you said BGF, unless your QB puts up big numbers against a stud defense, you shouldn't be too surprised.
As for Cushing, the before pictures are supposedly when he was coming back from an injury and so being out of shape is to be expected. That and the levels he tested positive for wouldn't have been been a problem in the 2008 season. That said, he's on PEDs.
the only way fans will look at Cushing as a great player is if he stays clean.
Like someone commented a few articles ago, it's a really good thing the NFL doesn't have a PED problem... No sir, all those players are clean. Shame on you Brian.
In Washington, DeAngelo Hall blistered Goodell after he left
Because when I think level-headed and rational, I think DeAngelo Hall.
Warner was a 65-percent passer in his five Arizona seasons; Leinart, in 29 career games, has completed 57 percent. Watching him last Thursday, he threw a couple in a row slightly behind Steve Breaston, then a low fastball to the ground to Early Doucet.
This bothers me. I know PK knows a big reason for this is that Warner had already been in the NFL nearly a decade while Leinart was still in the process of getting used to the NFL.
My question is this: why do "journalists" do this shit? If there's an obvious explanation for something, what exactly is the point of writing as if that reason doesn't exist. "A possible HOF player is better than a young player!" Really? Stop the motherfucking presses!
Additionally, it's training camp. Leinart hasn't thrown to Breaston probably since February, so it's only natural that they'd have to work on their timing, seeing as how that's one of the main concerns of training camp. Breaston is a fast guy, so it's only logical that if Leinart is going to miss, he's going to miss behind. Unlike Bradford, Leinart probably hasn't worked with the receivers before camp opened.
The "low fastball" is also explainable. Leinart had just thrown behind Breaston, so he had two options: throw the ball faster or aim for a point further ahead of the receiver. Behing a moron, Leinart probably opted for the former. So he probably gripped the ball too hard and tried to speed up his arm velocity in order to get the ball to Doucet, leading to a ball that misses low.
Is Leinart as good as Warner? No, but then again at Leinart's age, Warner wasn't even playing in the NFL.
Martin, do you think they should do that every week or just for the opening weekend? It's not a bad idea.
ReplyDeleteRich, I try not to get too excited about a quarterback until he has faced another team's pass rush and has to face actually getting sacked. You make good points and I never get excited about a quarterback until I see him in live action. I am sure Bradford isn't terrible but I think before we proclaim him the savior of the franchise the aspects you mentioned should be taken into account. I know Peter is excited about seeing Bradford play, but I think he needed to temper himself a little bit.
I knew I should not have linked Bleacher Report. I regretted it after I did it, but I was trying to show how he looked physically before and after. I don't believe his reasoning at all. The NFL has a concussion and steroid problem.
I think Leinart should be given a chance to start and I have to agree with you that any comparison to Warner and his rhythm with the receivers is unfair. The criticisms of Leinart that Peter included are a bit unfair. It's like he and others believe there won't be a drop-off in QB play for the Cardinals. Of course there will be. There isn't another Warner hanging out on the roster.
Leinart needs to manage the offense and not turn the ball over. I thought guys like Mark Sanchez got credit for doing that. Give Leinart a chance to develop a rhythm with his receivers over the next month and go from there.
Just the first week, when they have the opener on Thursday Night Football. The Prime Time Draft got a 6 1/2 rating, I'm sure they could pull at least that with an extra Friday Night Game. CBS wouldn't rather broadcast a game then CSI: NY, Medium and Flashpoint?
ReplyDeleteOr Fox with that Night at the Museum repeat movie?
the only way fans will look at Cushing as a great player is if he plays great. Football fans don't give a damn if the players are on PED's, only if they get caught and it costs them games.
Also, Leinart should be ok, if the Cardinals can just remember one thing that Football Outsiders has already discovered: Matt kills zone defenses, has trouble with man to man. Find plays that simulate zone coverage, get him in a comfort zone, he should be a nice avg qb.
I was surprised the draft got such good ratings honestly. I hated the move to Friday, but it turned out to make money, which means we will see it again next year. I don't think it is a terrible idea to have games on Fri/Sat night but I don't know if the NFL will ever do it.
ReplyDeleteNo one will remember Cushing got suspended if the Texans will just let it go and have him miss the first four games. I know he wants to clear his name, but everyone will forget soon.
I didn't know Leinart killed zone defenses. That's interesting. He deserves a shot without people comparing him to Warner or expecting him to be Warner. If he fails, get a new QB, but he is the best QB on the roster right now.