Showing posts with label Kyle Orton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kyle Orton. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

6 comments MMQB Review: Peter King May Have Had Bill Simmons Ghostwrite MMQB This Week

Peter King dedicated an entire page to Derek Jeter's retirement in last week's MMQB. Peter didn't even use his own thoughts about Jeter's retirement and instead used 20+ quotes from those affiliated with professional sports on what Jeter meant to them. Then, of course, Peter wondered why no one was acknowledging that Paul Konerko was retiring too and wondered who would acknowledge Konerko's retirement. Peter also continued with his "Russell Wilson is John Stockton" comparison and marveled at the unpredictable madness that is the NFL season. This week Peter talks about how Tom Brady hasn't magically become a terrible quarterback, updates us on the Rams' quarterback situation (see, the Rams signed a backup QB they didn't really like...apparently), is upset MLB doesn't have their playoff games in every hotel in the United States, and it turns out the NFL's John Stockton was a bully in school. But I'm sure he bullied kids without breaking a sweat, which would really impress Peter King. So here is MMQB written by Bill Simm---I mean Peter King. You'll see what I mean.

So, how many more days of the grand masters will there be? How many more Sundays of Tom Brady, 37, shaking his finger at reality and saying, “Not yet,” and going out and running an uptempo offense in a game the Patriots had to have—and in this case, beating the last unbeaten team in football and throwing for his 50,000th yard?

37.5 more Sundays, Peter. That's how many more.

How many more Sundays of Peyton Manning, 38, controlling fields full of players 10 and 15 years younger?

28.3651 more Sundays, Peter. That's how many more.

How many more days like Sunday in Denver, where he set a career mark for passing yards in a game (479) and threw his 500th touchdown pass—and 501st, and 502nd and 503rd—against the only other unbeaten team in football before Sunday?

Zero more Sundays because that's an oddly specific sort of day that Peyton Manning can never recreate unless he finds a way to throw a negative touchdown pass (I'm sure Rex Grossman could teach him how to do this) so that he can once again throw his 500th through 503th career touchdown pass.

Sunday was a highlight day in the NFL’s 95th season. It may turn out to be the year’s most scintillating set of games. The Bills shocked the Lions 17-14 at Ford Field in the last game of the 55-season Wilson ownership era, just a few miles from where Michigan native Ralph Wilson is buried. Dallas beat Houston in overtime, in a rivalry contested (stupidly) as often as presidents are elected in America.

Excellent comparison. Saying "contested every four years" was way too much straight to the point and not elaborate enough.

The drama was best in Foxboro. It often is.

The best drama is always on the East Coast. It's closer to where Peter works and lives and Foxboro is close to New York City, the epicenter of anything important that happens in the entire world, so naturally a little bit of that drama and super-specialness will bleed down to Foxboro.

I love how the media creates stories to discuss. Over the past week it was all, "Is the Patriots' dynasty over?" as the media gnashed it's teeth and wondered if the assumption they made was true and now the media is jumping all over the "Tom Brady ISN'T done story" as if it wasn't something of their own partial creation in the first place.

On Sunday night, the Patriots forced the issue from the first snap with a no-huddle look that attacked Cincinnati—a look a couple of Bengals said later they were ill-prepared for.

Because why would the Bengals be prepared for a no-huddle look that the Patriots will often show to gain rhythm? That would be madness!

This is the way offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels wants to play football now. In Wright, the Patriots finally have a tight end who knows the offense well enough to play significant time and become a downfield receiving threat.

The narrative a week ago was that the Patriots gave away protection for Tom Brady in exchange for a rarely-used tight end and a draft pick. This week after a win the rarely-used tight end is now a downfield threat who perfectly complements Rob Gronkowski. I'm struggling to keep up with these ever-changing narratives.

It was clear that the goal in this game, from those who play alongside Brady and those who sit in the stands, was as much support group for Brady as it was to get a win to retain AFC East supremacy. “We wanted to make Tom Brady look like Tom Brady tonight,” Gronkowski said forcefully later.

I think Bill Simmons has the rights to the "This was a game where the fans helped the team on the field pull through and everyone was united as one" bullshit, but I think he's too busy on the golf course enjoying a paid vacation to care that Peter has stolen it.

In Denver, Manning has more weapons and a better line than Brady, and Sunday was what we’ve come to expect from Manning: ridiculous production for a 38-year-old playing after four neck procedures. There is something so metronomic about Manning’s play. It’s like you’re going to have to drag him out of the game because he’s so good at it and because you can’t quite picture him doing anything else.

Yes, I certainly can't imagine Peyton Manning doing anything other than being a quarterback. God knows he rarely takes part in any off-the-field activities like doing commercials or hosting "Saturday Night Live" or anything like that. I can't imagine Peyton Manning doing anything but quarterbacking, unless I watch a commercial break during any NFL game, in which case I can imagine him being a pitch man for products after he retires.

What’s the end game for Manning?

World domination, then living the rest of his life in a 50,000 square foot mansion on top of a mountain where the only activities he will participate in daily are orgies with the 25 people helicoptered in daily, along with enough Papa John's pizza for a lifetime. You know, the usual.

How many more days will there be like this one, when two of the best quarterbacks of this, or any, generation, put their team on their backs and dominate an unbeaten?

Seven days. There will be seven more days, Peter.

For a clue, recall my summer conversation with Manning. He’s not looking years into the future, as Brady has been. He’s taking it a year at a time. “I’ve heard Drew Brees and Tom Brady say that they have this target, like, ‘I’m gonna play until I’m 45.'” Manning said in training camp. “I’m not in that position, I think because of my neck injury.

Or it could be because Manning chooses not to target a specific date at which he plans to retire. It could be the neck injury too I guess.

But I think the smart way to handle it is, every March, I do this physical and we take a look at it. It’s the perfect time, because it says, ‘Hey, everything looks good.’ And also kind of allows me to go, I still want to go through a lifting, off-season schedule again. I do my neck check, but I do my heart check as well, my desire check.

Hence the daily orgies with 25 other people in a 50,000 mansion on top of a mountain. It all makes sense now. It's not an orgy, but a desire check.

I like it when my heart says, Hey, let’s keep this going. I’ve been encouraged.”

I like it when my heart talks too, Peyton. It has so many interesting things to say if you just listen to your heart. Especially when it's calling for you. Just listen to your heart, really there's nothing else you can do. Peyton doesn't know where's going and he doesn't know why, but he will listen to his heart before he tells football goodbye.  

That’s good. Watching what we watched Sunday can’t get old.

It gets old if you are a fan of the team Peyton Manning is playing on that specific Sunday.

The Niners have their version of Brady/Manning.

His name is Frank Gore. And with the team in crisis mode over the last eight days, he’s come on strong.

He's the John Stockton version of the Brady/Manning for the 49ers.

“So how do you think I’ve looked?” Gore asked from the Niners’ locker room after his second straight 100-yard game keyed San Francisco’s second straight win Sunday.
 
Like you’re carrying an anvil in each shoulder pad.

Which would be completely illegal to do. Let's clear that up right away.

I asked Gore about the controversy swirling around Harbaugh. FOX’s Jay Glazer reported Sunday that no matter the outcome of this season, it would be Harbaugh’s last with the team.

I'm sure Gore was 100% honest with Peter in giving the answer to this question.

That follows the reports coming from Deion Sanders and Trent Dilfer that multiple players on the Niners don’t like playing for Harbaugh.

Can we rewind for about 10 years and wonder how the sports world has changed that Trent Dilfer and Deion Sanders are reporting something that is taken for the truth? 10 years ago I wouldn't have believed anything Deion Sanders said.

“Are there guys in the locker room who have a problem with Jim Harbaugh?’’ I asked Gore.

“We don’t think that way,” Gore said. 

 So, "yes."

“As a football player I feel coach loves me. He’s a winner. He loves the game. We love the game. We’re a family, and we’re all football.’’

Jim Harbaugh loves coaching, which is why he is an NFL head coach. Other than that, it's the non-answer that is to be expected from a veteran who wants to make sure he keeps a job and keeps getting the football, so he won't go out of his way to piss off the coaching staff.

On the Niners’ side, they don’t want to make Harbaugh the highest-paid coach in football, or close, shy of his winning a Super Bowl. So if he does that this year, who knows? Maybe CEO Jed York and GM Trent Baalke can swallow hard and make a long-term deal and make it work. But the odds are stacked against that now. And an alternative such as Roman or defensive-line coach Jim Tomsula (who led a 38-7 win over Arizona as interim coach in the final game of 2010) would make for a peaceful life around the Niners’ facility.

Right, but would they be as good at coaching as Jim Harbaugh seems to be? He does thrive in chaos, but maybe that chaos is how the gets the most out of his football team, while other head coaches may not be able to get as much out of the 49ers team with a peaceful life around the facility.

I covered Bill Parcells with the Giants, and he and GM George Young never got along famously. But they won. Owner Wellington Mara knew about the dysfunction, and he didn’t like it, but he liked Parcells, and he liked winning.

Winning is the best. If "winning" were a vaccine it could prevent and cure dozens of diseases, because winning cures nearly everything. Think the 49ers have dysfunction now? Imagine if the team was losing and the players didn't like Harbaugh.

How does Kyle Orton walk onto a new team with a new offense he hasn’t run, start a game six weeks later against a hot defense, and find a way to win on the road?

Because he's not a bad quarterback to have as a backup and spot starter?

With some help from his friends. With the game in Detroit tied at 14 and less than a minute left in the fourth quarter, Orton needed about 25 yards to put the Bills in field-goal range. He threw a crossing route to  Sammy Watkins, but the throw was behind the streaking rookie. Watkins reached back, flipped the ball into the air and toward himself, and hauled it in. What a catch. Gain of 20.

A play that undoubtedly will go unmentioned by Gregg Easterbrook this week and a great example of how a quarterback like Orton doesn't get enough respect from Peter King. Orton needed help from his friends to beat the Lions on the road according to Peter. I guess no other NFL quarterbacks need help from their teammates to win games. And yes, the official Kyle Orton Defender blogger is back. I'm getting the fan club started up again.

“I could get one hand on the ball,” Watkins said from Detroit, “and I knew it was a catch we needed. Kyle put the ball where I could get it all day.

Yeah, he can do things like that when necessary.

Detroit also could be without Reggie Bush (ankle) Sunday at Minnesota. The Lions finished the game with a running back named George Winn on Sunday. He’s on his sixth team in 17 months, and the Lions may have to ride him until Bush and the concussed Joique Bell are ready to return.

I'll feel bad for them once they start their fourth-string running back and their second-string full back.

Owners and prominent club officials will be the first team personnel to take the one-hour Domestic Violence training class that all NFL employees will be required to take this fall …

I will do a two-minute Domestic Violence training class for half of the cost of this one-hour class. It's easy. Don't hit your girlfriend/wife/random girl/any woman for any reason.

I’ve seen enough of Brian Hoyer to know he deserves a legitimate chance to win the quarterback job into the future for Cleveland. He’s been unflappable. His teammates love him. I’m not saying he’ll be a great player. I’m saying he has a chance to be the answer to the question they’ve been asking in Cleveland since drafting Tim Couch in 1999 … 

I think Hoyer has won the quarterback job of the future in Cleveland as long as he keeps winning games. I haven't heard anything else about this story, but is Hoyer really going to lose his job to Johnny Manziel if Hoyer continues to play well? For a team that has looked for a starter for the last 15 years I can't imagine the fan base would react well to getting rid of one of the few quarterbacks that has played well for the Browns.

The Broncos cut—arguably—the best kicker in football. Last year Matt Prater kicked a 64-yard field goal. It broke a 43-year-old record for the longest field goal in NFL history (set by Tom Dempsey in 1970 and matched three times since). Prater led the league with 81 touchbacks and converted 100 of 101 kicks (75 extra points, and all field goals but a 52-yarder wide left on Nov. 17). But then he was suspended for violating the league’s alcohol policy; he had a DUI in 2011 and had an unspecified violation this offseason, leading to the four-game ban. The Broncos’ kicker now will be Brandon McManus, acquired from the Giants for a 2015 seventh-round pick before this season. Gutsy move by John Elway. Though McManus has a great leg—of his first 16 kickoffs, 14 went for touchbacks—he’s totally unproven on field goals.

Other than being 5-6 on the season, he is unproven. McManus has never even kicked a field goal before. In fact, he's never even seen a football prior to this past season.

Two major reasons for the move: 1) The Broncos lost trust in Prater, who had to fight to get his suspension reduced to four games at the start of the season; the Broncos didn’t want to be left in the lurch if Prater had another alcohol violation and got suspended for a full year. 2) He was due to make $2.3 million for the final 12 games of the season; McManus’s salary as an undrafted rookie is $420,000—a key factor with some big contracts coming due (Demaryius Thomas, Julius Thomas, Pot Roast Knighton) for Denver in 2015. The Broncos save $3.25 million next season with Prater off the books now.

How much is a Super Bowl worth? I'm just wondering. Teams don't miss a good kicker until they have a shitty kicker.

The Rams gave the quarterback job “for the remainder of the season” to Austin Davis.

(Jeff Fisher shuffles the deck chairs on a sinking ship, then signs a contract extension that is handed to him)

I suppose it’s not a “wow” that Shaun Hill had the job taken from him after about 15 minutes, but Davis has played better than anyone in St. Louis thought he would (completion percentages in his three games: 70, 76, 71),

Davis has played pretty well, which has surprised me. I still wonder why the Rams didn't have a better backup than Shaun Hill on the roster for when Sam Bradford inevitably got injured. Actually, with Hill playing so well I sort of wonder why the Rams were even counting on Bradford this season at all and handed him the starting job without much competition for the spot. There is clearly a lot of talent on the Rams roster in certain spots, no matter what Gregg Easterbrook says.

and during the Rams’ bye week Jeff Fisher, who hates quarterback controversies and thinks they distract a team, decided to not make this a temporary thing.

Just another brilliant move by Jeff Fisher to prevent his team from being distracted by the quarterback situation and focusing on the fact the team is 1-3. But hey, give Fisher a few more years and he is going to turn this Rams team around. It's a team on the rise!

To me this says Fisher and the Rams were tepid believers in Hill in the first place, and chose the other quarterback from Southern Mississippi (there has not been a long line of them since Brett Favre) as their guy for the rest of the year.

This does bring up the question of why the Rams signed a backup quarterback they were tepid believers in to back up the quarterback that is perpetually injured? I guess these are the sorts of things a coaching staff can do when they have excellent job security.

Fisher’s right: He won’t have a quick hook with Davis, but by giving the job to Hill then snatching it back when Hill was healthy, Fisher showed he will be ruled by how Davis plays.

What a decisive move and it really shows leadership. Fisher says he is going to play the better quarterback until that quarterback sufficiently proves he isn't worthy of starting. What's left unsaid by Peter is that Fisher and the Rams put themselves in a position where Davis pretty much has to be the starter because he has proven himself to be competent and there really aren't a ton of other options on the roster. Yep, still harping on the whole "Let's count on Sam Bradford this year even though he has proven he can't be counted on to stay healthy" thing. Even when Davis plays decently, it seems like a crazy strategy to me. I mean, what else are the Rams going to do though? Fire Fisher or suggest he isn't worth the money they are paying him? Not when Fisher has his friends in the national media to watch his back.

Terry Pegula, 63, who has made his fortune in the natural gas and fracking businesses, and wife Kim are likely to be approved in a landslide by the NFL’s 31 owners at the annual fall meeting in New York City. He’s buying the Bills for $1.4 billion, almost $500 million more than their appraised value,

Memo to Scoop Jackson that the Bills sold for way above appraised value in a situation where no racism was involved. I guess fracking pays?

If you rank by TV markets, Buffalo is 52nd (because of its surrounding counties). But if the NFL franchise in Buffalo is worth $1.4 billion, what are the franchises in New York worth? What would the Cowboys sell for?

And you won't hear a peep from Scoop Jackson, because it would require too much self-awareness to notice that the Bills sold for $1.4 billion and an NBA team in a great market like Los Angeles might have actually sold for $2 billion because professional franchises are worth a lot of money, not because racism pays or any other conspiratorial reason.

Talked to three people well-informed about the draft’s move from New York City to Chicago next spring, and all three said the same thing: Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel was the driving force behind Chicago’s bid. “He and the Chicago group were incredibly passionate,” said the league’s senior vice president of events, Peter O’Reilly.

And really, Chicago has no other issues facing the city at this point so I can see how Rahm Emanuel was so focused on getting the NFL Draft to come to the city.

And here is a question from Peter's three question interview with Rahm Emanuel.

The MMQB: Are you concerned with the recent spate of domestic violence incidents in the NFL?
 

Emanuel: No, and here’s why: I am building the first new domestic violence shelter in the city in the last 10 years—100 beds. 

So Rahm Emanuel isn't concerned about the recent spate of domestic violence incidents in the NFL because these victims can all stay in Chicago at the new shelter he is building? Or is Rahm Emanuel just using MMQB to further push his agenda and brag about his future achievements? So Emanuel isn't concerned about the recent spate of domestic violence in the NFL because he has a place for these domestic violence victims to stay if they live in Chicago. Problem solved. 

My whole career I have fought domestic violence, and we need to take it out of the darkness. The NFL is addressing it head-on, and we’re going to continue to do that too.

Is the NFL addressing the issue of domestic violence head-on? It sort of seems like the NFL has been behind the curve in regard to domestic violence. I think only a person who is trying to paint the NFL in a positive light would agree that the NFL has addressed the domestic violence issue head-on. Maybe "head-on" to Rahm Emanuel means, "They addressed it when people started to get pissed off that the NFL wasn't really addressing the issue of domestic violence." If so, then yes, the NFL has addressed the issue aggressively.

The Fine Fifteen

At this point I might as well just pick this thing out of a hat. I mean, what do you do with New England? Dallas? San Francisco? Detroit?

Maybe you should just skip it this week then?

3. San Diego (4-1). Wait a minute. Best rushing defense in football (Jets) takes the field at Qualcomm on Sunday, and the Chargers basically clinch the game before halftime when their fourth running back, Branden Oliver, runs 15 yards through the defense for a touchdown to make it 21-0, capping a 91-yard drive. Not a good day for the Jets, but the Chargers had a lot to do with it in the 31-0 rout.

Wait, so Peter you are saying the Chargers had something to do with the Jets losing 21-0 at halftime? I can't believe it. I'm shocked to hear this.

4. Dallas (4-1). All those who had the Cowboys on a four-game winning streak after losing their opener, raise your hands. Okay, the two of you out there in Abilene with hands raised, just stop. You’re lying.

"We" didn't know the Cowboys were this good because Peter King didn't know the Cowboys were going to be this good!

6. Cincinnati (3-1). No Bengals jokes this morning, just this bit of reality that coach Marvin Lewis and coordinators Hue Jackson and Paul Guenther must pass on to the players this week: We went to New England, a desperate team. We never matched their aggressiveness. We never fought them. We let them dictate to us. Championship teams don’t do that, and that’s why we’re not a championship team right now.

Mostly it is Andy Dalton's fault of course. After the Patriots loss two nights ago, he STILL hasn't won a playoff game as the Bengals starting quarterback.

15. Buffalo (3-2). I just love the fact that the Bills have been owned by the Wilson family of suburban Detroit for 55 seasons, and in the last game of the Wilson reign, the Bills played in Detroit for the fifth time ever and won a thriller on a 58-yard field goal in the final seconds. Perfect.

I don't get it. How is this perfect? The number "5" is in all of these interesting little factoids and Wilson owned the Bills for 55 seasons? Is that it? No, really is that IT?

Quotes of the Week

“I don’t blame them for hating me now.”
 
—New Orleans defensive coordinator Rob Ryan, who was the toast of the French Quarter last fall and whose unit has been regularly booed this year.

I always wonder if his name was Rob Drysdale if Rob Ryan would still have a defensive coordinator job in the NFL or not.

“You want Joe Buck and Troy Aikman doing your games. Nothing against David Diehl. He’s a helluva kid.”
 
—Arizona coach Bruce Arians on Buck and Aikman calling his game Sunday against Denver. The Cardinals might have to get used to the number one FOX crew doing some of their games now, instead of lesser ones.
 
“I quit trusting my gut a long time ago. Son of a b—- has been lying to me forever.’’
 
—Arians, asked early in the week if his gut feel was that Carson Palmer would play on Sunday.

Chip Kelly better watch out. Peter King may include a "Wisdom of Bruce Arians" feature in MMQB very soon. Who am I kidding? Peter will just include two weekly features with wisdom from both Chip Kelly and Bruce Arians. Anything to kill space.

Mr. Starwood Preferred Member Travel Note of the Week

Stayed at a Connecticut hotel Saturday night. Checked in around 6 and turned on the TV to watch the end of Alabama-Ole Miss. During a commercial, I flipped through the 50 channels to see how Nats-Giants was progressing. The TV didn’t have FOX Sports 1. No Nats-Giants then.

What? Why doesn't this hotel have Fox Sports 1? Doesn't this unnamed hotel know who Peter King is? He can't afford MLB.com or any of those other expensive fancy things which will help him keep up with baseball games. Thankfully, this hotel had fresh, free coffee ready to be served at 6am or else Peter would have just burnt the entire hotel down upon checking out the following day.

After dinner I came back to the room. I didn’t want to miss Cards-Dodgers—not if it was going to be anything like the Friday night masterpiece, one of the best baseball games of the year. I flipped through the channels again. No MLB Network. There was HGTV, SyFy, OWN, WE TV, the Hallmark Movie Channel. But no baseball.

Welcome to the world of those who don't have digital cable and can't get every channel known to exist. Cable companies are evil and they refuse to give you the channels you actually want and insist on giving out the channels they want you to have. Welcome to the world Peter, I hope you enjoy what other people go through when wanting to find a channel that's not offered while seeing 40 channels you personally have no interest in watching.

Neither baseball playoff game was on my TV Saturday night.

Doesn't that television know who you are? You are Peter King. You deserve to watch what you want to watch when you want to watch it.

How can Major League Baseball put its showcase games on channels that don’t make the cut on a 50-channel cable system at a hotel?

While that is a good question, I am not sure MLB can make sure every hotel in the United States (and it's kind of random how hotels specifically should carry these games) carries the games they want to showcase. MLB and Fox Sports want you to demand cable companies carry MLB Network and Fox Sports 1, so this is one way to do this. Yet, I'm not sure MLB is worried that every hotel in the United States carries the games. After all, Peter could easily have gone to a sports bar to watch the games. So I do agree with him in principle and it's a lesson to MLB that they need to get these two channels in more homes. I think it's smart to put these games on a channel that guarantees anyone without digital cable could watch. Still, what makes the 50-channel cable lineup at a hotel isn't for MLB to decide and this goes to show how cable companies are evil and don't give a shit about the needs of their customers because they will continue to assume no other company will come along and give customers the specific channels they want at a lower price. It will happen one day...just never forget how evil cable companies are.


Good thing Jim Schwartz got back at the Lions for firing him due to his being a bad NFL head coach. He must feel good about himself that proved the Lions wrong that he wasn't a good NFL head coach by coming back and beating the Lions with the Bills when he was not the Bills head coach. He proved he is a good defensive coordinator. That'll show 'em. 

Ten Things I Think I Think

1. I think this is what I liked about Week 5:

e. Jay Glazer’s unequivocal report that Jim Harbaugh absolutely will not return as Niners coach in 2015.

So Peter likes the decision that Harbaugh will absolutely not return as 49ers coach or he likes the unequivocal report coming from Jay Glazer? It's a little confusing.

j. Eli Manning, who kept telling everyone the Giants’ offense would be fine, and no one believed him, and he’s turning out to be right.

I believed Eli Manning when he said the Giants' offense would be fine. I know Peter believes that because he didn't think the Giants' offense would be fine this means no one else shared this view, but that's not true. I'm not sure if I am noticing it more or Peter is just doing this type of thing more often, but he seems to be using terms like "we" and "nobody" to refer to when he is wrong about something and he is assuming everyone was wrong too.

k. The legitimate lift Odell Beckham Jr. provided the Giants in his first game.

This is as opposed to the illegitimate lift another receiver gave his team? I feel like Peter has been reading a lot of Bill Simmons lately. Maybe Bill Simmons is ghostwriting this MMQB! The "we" and "nobody" references along with the bizarre use of "legitimate" in a situation where it doesn't need to be used tips me off.

n. Luke Kuechly tormenting Matt Forte.

Forte had 166 total yards on the day, so if he got tormented by Luke Kuechly then Bears fans probably want Forte to be tormented a lot more often.

o. Jordan Matthews, the Eagles’ rookie receiver, who plays like an instinctive vet.

He plays like an instinctive doctor who specializes in working on animals?

r. Philip Rivers, who somehow gets better as he gets older.

Actually, a lot of athletes get better as they get older. If this wasn't true then every athlete's best season would be his/her rookie season. Uh-oh, I'm getting hypercritical now.

s. The New England offensive line. No unit took more guff last week (70% of it justified),

Another Bill Simmons trademark is giving a random percentage that can't be proven or disproven. I'm 76% sure that Peter King is in the process of reading Bill Simmons' entire column archive.

2. I think this is what I didn’t like about Week 5:

a. The Bengals coming up so, so small

They played a very motivated Patriots team on the road. They don't get a mulligan, but "we" didn't think they were really the best team in the NFL did "we?"

f. Logan Mankins, beaten on a stunt for the crucial safety by Saints pass-rusher Junior Gallette.

See? Trading Logan Mankins was a brilliant move for the Patriots. They got rid of a highly-paid, highly-drafted glory boy in favor of undrafted free agents who care about the team. Just a week ago the trade of Mankins for Wright and a draft pick was a bad move, but now it's genius.

q. The Jets, who lead the league is disappointment after five weeks.

Yes, they do lead the league is disappointment. It's almost as disappointing as easy-to-fix typos in MMQB.

The sports world is better when the Kansas City Royals are winning playoff games and the bottom-feeders in college football rise up.

Gregg Easterbrook thinks the NFL season is more interesting when the Chiefs are winning games. There most be something very interesting about Kansas City. Is it the barbeque, the history of mafia activity or some other reason I can't quantify from not having lived in the area?

6. I think Russell Wilson did a nice job in his story for Derek Jeter’s new website, The Players Tribune, writing about domestic violence, admitting he was once a bully (evidently a pretty serious one) and asking fans/readers to contribute $2 to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

Russell Wilson is a reformed bully! He's the John Stockton of reformed bullies. 

I like when players sign their names to important causes; so many of them (Michael Jordan and the aforementioned Jeter most notably) never make prominent public stands on such issues. Wrote Wilson: “Domestic violence isn’t going to disappear tomorrow or the next day. But the more that we choose not to talk about it, the more we shy away from the issue, the more we lose.”

Kudos to Wilson for taking a public stand, but I hope Peter understands that being a bully in school and domestic violence are two separate issues with two separate traumas for the victim. Not to mention, it's not exactly difficult to take a public stand against domestic violence. I'm pretty sure every athlete would take a stand against domestic violence if asked what they thought about it. Still, it's good that Russell Wilson is asking readers to donate money.

10. I think these are my non-football thoughts of the week:

g. My lord: Kent Tekulve threw out the first pitch at the Pirates’ wild-card game 26 days after undergoing a heart transplant.

Unnecessary italics! That's another trait of a Bill Simmons column. I really think Bill is ghostwriting MMQB during his three week ESPN-paid vacation.

h. Madison Bumgarner looks like the next Jon Lester to me—the next power-pitching, big-game lefty. What a game he threw in Pittsburgh.

Ah yes, Madison Bumgarner is the next Jon Lester. It's impossible to compare Bumgarner to a pitcher who didn't play for the Red Sox I guess. That's another trait of Bill Simmons' writing. He only compares athletes to athletes who played for his favorite team. Also, Lester got hit pretty hard in the Wild Card game against the Royals. Maybe that wasn't a big enough game for him. I'm really starting to wonder if Bill Simmons isn't ghostwriting this MMQB. 

i. How about Giants relief pitcher Hunter Strickland, he of nine major-league appearances, walking into the opening game of the National League Division Series at Washington, bases loaded, Giants up 2-0, bottom of the sixth, two outs, and facing one of the best-hitting second basemen in the game, Ian Desmond.

Maybe someone should tell Ian Desmond he is one of the best-hitting second basemen in the game. He has played the position in five games during his career and played shortstop during the entire 2014 season. But no, way for Peter to throw out that baseball knowledge he thinks he has. Ian Desmond is the Dustin Pedroia of good hitting second basemen, except Desmond plays shortstop.

Not to mention, Desmond isn't a bad hitter, but I think Peter is overemphasizing the amount of home runs Desmond hits as signifying he is a good hitter. I mean, he's okay, but Desmond only had a .255 average with a .313 OBP. His strikeout to walk ratio was 4.25:1. So he's good at hitting home runs, which is apparently what impresses Peter the most.

j. The Giants have some grind-out-at-bat guys, befitting their manager.

This is analysis.

n. Great stat from Bernie Miklasz of the St. Louis Post Distpatch: The Cards have 28 postseason victories in the last four seasons, 11 more than any other team in baseball.

That's why they are America's team and there is no way anyone can hate them for being the most successful and best team with the greatest, most knowledgeable fans in baseball over the last four seasons. How can you hate a group of people who can't wait to tell you how special they are? 

s. Coffeenerdness: I was doing so well in the off-season, controlling the coffee intake. But now I’m back to the equivalent of five cups a day. The demon is the mid-afternoon cup, which I always feel with the 3:45 a.m. wakeup. Shouldn’t I be smarter than an afternoon cup of high-test by now?

Yes, a thousand times over. You should be smarter. 

The Adieu Haiku

The Patriots live.
Those reports of their demise?
Exaggerated.

The only reports were coming from you and your friends in the media. You helped write the narrative after one bad Patriots loss and then changed it around after one big Patriots win.

Let's see:

1. Writing in italics for emphasis.

2. Saying "we" a lot and indicating because he was personally wrong then everyone else was wrong.

3. Only comparing an athlete to a Boston-area athlete.

4. Going on about what a great player Tom Brady is and how the fans rallied around him like they KNEW he needed the help.

5. Giving out an arbitrary percentage that can't be proven or disproven.

6. The use of the word "legitimate" in a situation where it doesn't need to be used.

Bill Simmons, is that you?



Tuesday, May 29, 2012

5 comments MMQB Review: Bill Polian Has a "What If" Scenario That Would Have Saved His Job Edition

In last week's MMQB, Peter King took on the city of London, the game of cricket and officially approved England as a place to get coffee and beer. He walked across Abbey Road, managing to evade the locals who are probably tired of people walking across the crosswalk there and claimed we just don't appreciate the opposing team in the United States like they do in England. This week Peter takes on the NFL's trade deadline and wants the sports media to stop all of this non-stop QB Jets coverage. Peter naturally then mentions QB Jets multiple times in MMQB. Apparently everyone should stop covering QB Jets, except Peter has also been guilty of mentioning him multiple times in the present and past as well. Fortunately, QB Jets will be out of the NFL and on to doing something else with his life in a few more years (much to the chagrin of Skip Bayless). So we should all hang in there until that time comes.

Happy Memorial Day. I know for many of you, Memorial Day has become an extra day off, or the start of the summer. But it's a day on which we should spend a few moments remembering the million men and women who have died fighting for our country.

Thanks for putting us all on the right track Peter. If anyone is in a position to give us perspective on the world it is the guy who gripes about major national issues such as rental car companies charging him too much for gas, coffee at a hotel not being ready and available at 6am, and being charged for the use wireless internet in public. Without Peter King around I'm not sure anyone else could seem to teach us a lesson about Memorial Day in such a lofty fashion.

Before we get to football, I have one modern, tragic Memorial Day story for you.

Boy, Peter is just full non-uplifting stories today isn't he?

"Oh, and here is one more thing that will depress you for today. Kittens get run over by cars, we all know that. But what if a kitten riding on a puppy's back gets hit by a car going 60 miles per hour, fly across the road and both of their bodies end up on your front porch. Let's say neither of them are dead once they hit your porch, so you have to put them both out of their misery and all you have to do the deed is a plastic spork. Isn't that sad?!"

On the picnic table for your reading pleasure today (and just think -- you can read this while you're off, instead of stealing company time on a Monday morning to read):

I'm not sure Peter wants to refer to the people who read his column as "stealing company time," whether this is true or not. After all, he relies on these people to give him pageviews so he can continue to give his opinion on issues nobody would ever really care about if he didn't write for CNNSI.com. Don't insult the hand that feeds you by accusing MMQB readers of stealing company time when reading the column.

• The trade deadline was moved from Week 6 to Week 8 the other day. Had that been done in 2011, the course of current football history likely would have changed radically. And I mean "radically."

You mean we get to hear some "what if" scenarios? Nothing makes me less excited than to hear "what if" scenarios in regard to situations that end up not occurring. They are the journalistic form of self-pleasuring one's self. You create a situation that didn't happen and then change the variables around to suit whatever point you are currently trying to prove, and we as an audience are supposed to be super-entertained by these fictional situations.

But no, I'm pumped to hear what would happen if the NFL trade deadline was moved back two weeks.

• It shows my age, I suppose, but there was a shift in the media world order on Thursday, and no one paid it much mind. A major American city won't have a daily newspaper starting this fall.

I love how Peter says "no one paid it much mind." Peter is talking about the cutting back of The Times-Picayune to being published three times per week. Apparently Peter doesn't think enough attention was paid to this and so "no one" paid it much mind. I disagree. I think attention was paid, but it didn't deserve absolute outrage since this is the direction newspapers are headed. Most people know the newspaper business is dying, so while people were sad about this it didn't create the shockwaves I think Peter felt was necessary because it seemed inevitable. It's a big deal and is not a happy turn of events, but it is representative of where the newspaper business is headed.

I know nobody my age who gets the newspaper everyday. Apparently Peter wants mass protests in the street from New Orleans residents. Maybe if "The Times-Picayune" editor had attempted to intentionally injure another newspaper editor by putting a bounty on him, the New Orleans citizens would take up the paper's cause a bit more passionately, since being punished for breaking rules seems to get the New Orleans area to rise up as one and take action.

• I'm no lawyer, though I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night

Did they provide free coffee? Was the free coffee any good? If not, Holiday Inn Express should be ashamed of itself that the free coffee wasn't the best coffee-flavored water that had ever touched Peter's over-caffeinated lips.

We'll start with the rules change from last Tuesday that I assumed was meaningless. But you know what happens when you assume things.

You start formulating "what if" scenarios?

I feel strongly the deadline should be around Dec. 1, to stimulate real action to help teams trying to win a division and to buttress with draft choices those teams out of the pennant race with four or five weeks to go.

But last year, there's a real chance that moving the deadline by two weeks -- from Oct. 18, the deadline, to Nov. 1, the day after the end of Week 8 -- would have netted the Indianapolis Colts Kyle Orton.

Which very well could have caused the Colts to win 3-4 games on the season and they would have missed out on the chance to get Andrew Luck. How could this be a good thing for the Colts? Because they get to keep Peyton Manning for a few more years and delay the inevitable rebuilding process without Manning? I know it sounds dumb to say releasing of a Hall of Fame quarterback is a good thing, but the Colts have a chance to build a good team around Andrew Luck and a new coaching staff. I'm not sure if the Colts have this chance if they try to squeeze a few more years out of Manning by going into "win now" mode. At best it works out and they delay the rebuilding by a few years while giving the Colts a chance to compete with Manning. At worst, the Colts are in the same position in 2012 that they were in during 2011. I'm probably over-thinking this, but a trade for Kyle Orton didn't seem like a good idea at the time or in retrospect.

I would argue a Kyle Orton trade wouldn't be a good thing for the Colts. It was a good thing for Bill Polian because he possibly could have saved his job by setting up a way for the Colts to win a few more games. After all, that's what being a General Manager is all about, saving your own job.

And if that had happened, and the Colts had won just one or two more games than they did, it would have resulted in Peyton Manning staying a Colt ... and Andrew Luck being drafted by somebody else.

I know Peyton Manning is a Hall of Famer, but the Colts had the perfect time after this season to move on, blow the Colts up and start over when they let Manning go. It really isn't necessarily a bad thing for a franchise to start over every once in a while, as long as that franchise knows what direction it wants to go.

"I think the deadline being moved last year would have made a difference for us,'' said Bill Polian, the Colts president until owner Jim Irsay fired him in January. "We would have rekindled our interest in Orton. In Week 6, we knew our quarterback situation wasn't great, but after a couple more weeks, we realized the situation was bad. We probably would have called Denver, who'd gone to [Tim] Tebow by then, and said, 'Hey, we'll give you a three [a third-round draft choice] for Orton.' ''

Maybe I'm the only one that thinks this is crazy. The Colts were 0-6 at this point. They would have had to end the season on a 9-1 streak just to tie the Bengals for the Wild Card spot. They weren't making the playoffs at that point. Why give up a 3rd round pick to get a one year stop gap quarterback in order to win a few more games? I'm all about winning games, but it was clear by Week 6 this was a flawed Colts team without Peyton Manning. Is it really smart to give up a third round choice for a stop-gap solution at quarterback when that pick can be (and was) used to draft a player who can make a long-term impact on the Colts roster?

The Colts had two 3rd round picks and chose T.Y. Hilton and Dwayne Allen with these picks. Both of these players have a chance to make an impact with the 2012 Indianapolis Colts team. If anything, the Colts should want the trade deadline extended so they could trade players in order to RECEIVE draft picks.

Now, how much difference would Orton have made in the last eight games of the season, had he been dealt? Indianapolis went 2-6 with Painter and Orlovsky. In four of those eight games, the Colts threw for fewer than 130 net passing yards.

We all know I like Kyle Orton. He wouldn't have helped the Colts go 9-1 over the last 10 games. Giving up a 3rd round pick for him when he is only going to take the Colts from a really bad team to a pretty bad team didn't make long-term sense for the franchise. Who am I to criticize Bill Polian though? He's a genius! He ran the expansion Panthers into the ground with win-now moves and then made a lateral move to the Colts before he had to clean up all of his mistakes. He also managed to put the Colts together so that if they lost their starting quarterback they went from a division-winning team to a 2-14 team. I probably shouldn't criticize this genius who makes zero mistakes.

Polian is convinced Orton would have been responsible for at least another win or two ... perhaps in an offensively hapless 17-3 home loss to Jacksonville, or a 19-13 loss at Jacksonville, or an eight-point home loss to Carolina.

Losing is never a good thing, but if the Colts had won two or three more games it only would have taken them out of the running for Andrew Luck and would have given a somewhat false picture of the franchise's health. Of course it would have saved Bill Polian's job, which naturally is all he really cares about.

I agree with Polian: With Orton, the Colts would have been better than 2-6 in their last eight games. Two wins better, and they'd have held OTA practices for the last two weeks with Peyton Manning as their quarterback.

At which point they would have had a 36 year old quarterback with major injury issues running the team and he would have had to sign a good backup quarterback (ok...maybe Orton) in case Manning gets injured. The Colts were going to have to start over in the next 2-3 years at the quarterback position and Luck is probably the best QB prospect to come out of college in a decade. Granted, it would have been nice to compete with Manning as the starting quarterback for a few more years. I struggle to see why trading draft picks to win a few more games was a good move. This wasn't a terrible year to start over.

In that case, the first two picks in the draft would have gone to St. Louis (2-14) and Minnesota (3-13). Who would have traded up for Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III in that case, Washington and which other team? Or would Minnesota have fallen head over heels for Luck or Griffin and picked one of the QBs, even though the Vikes drafted Christian Ponder a year earlier?

It doesn't matter because it didn't happen.

But this one situation -- and maybe it's only one -- shows moving the deadline has the potential to have a profound impact on the future of the game.

I'm with Peter on moving the trade deadline back. A trade of Orton to the Colts wouldn't have had a significant impact on anything other than to save Bill Polian's job (unless Jim Irsay smartly wanted to start over even if the Colts didn't get the #1 overall pick) and have the Colts get the #3 overall pick instead of the #1 overall pick. If I'm the Colts, I'm happy it worked out the way it did. Peyton Manning was a fantastic quarterback for so long, but the 2011 season was a perfect example of how a great quarterback can mask a team's weaknesses. Starting over, as long as there is a definite plan and direction, isn't a bad thing. Trading for Orton would only have delayed the inevitable divorce from Peyton Manning. Possibly Manning could have gotten 2-3 more years out of playing for the Colts, but there's always the chance he wouldn't. Andrew Luck is (supposedly) a franchise quarterback and the Colts can build around him for the next decade AND they get to keep the third-round pick they would have traded for Orton.

Emery's philosophy, he said, is to find players with growth potential, who make plays, who play like they love football. "I want the players with the high ceilings, with the largest capacity for growth,'' he said. "And I believe every aspect of that player is on tape. You can see him, you can read him.''

Which is a shocking statement to me considering Phil Emery then drafted Alshon Jeffrey. Jeffrey wasn't always at his optimal weight in college and whenever I saw him play seemed to struggle a bit in getting separation from the corner.

But Emery believed in Jeffery, in part because of his 23 career touchdowns, in part because of his hungry play around the goal line, and in part because of the consistent effort he showed.

Nebraska cornerback Alonzo Dennard, a 7th round pick (though he was projected to go higher), shut down Jeffrey for periods of time in a bowl game and Jeffrey's hype has rarely matched his production. He is a big receiver though. We all know big receivers tend to blind NFL General Managers to any faults that receiver may have. Height tends to blind General Managers to a receiver's faults.

Then Peter starts complaining about the QB Jets coverage...by discussing the QB Jets coverage. It is a self-perpetuating cycle.

The Giants, the defending Super Bowl champions, were beginning to adjust to life without their third receiver, Mario Manningham, who left for San Francisco in free agency. In the morning workout, top wide receiver Hakeem Nicks went down with a broken bone in his foot. The Giants announced he would be out for as long as 12 weeks, which is dangerously close to the Sept. 5 season opener.

The Jets, coming off a season in which they didn't make the playoffs, had Tim Tebow in practice for the first time he could be viewed in action by the media. Tebow is the backup quarterback to Mark Sanchez, but with the charisma Tebow has and the way Sanchez struggled last year, it could be a matter of time before Tebow challenges the incumbent.

This is the monster the media has helped to create.

Words devoted by the five major dailies to the Super Bowl champions losing their number one receiver, possibly for all of the offseason training and training camp, and perhaps threatening the start of his season: 2,104.

Words devoted by the five major dailies to Tebow's first practice visible to the media: 6,971.

Words in this MMQB about QB Jets and how much press he gets: 258.

Words in this MMQB about Hakeem Nicks and his injury: 147.

So 23 percent of the football writing in Friday's papers in greater New York was devoted to a serious injury to a top player on the defending Super Bowl champions.

It's Tebowland, baby.

If it weren't for the fact Peter was comparing the coverage of Nicks' injury to the coverage of QB Jets in Jets' camp it's possible Peter would not have mentioned the Nicks injury at all. So Peter devoted 75% more space to the coverage of QB Jets than he devoted to covering Nicks' injury and may have never discussed Nicks' injury if he wasn't using it as a comparison to the New York media's discussion about QB Jets. So who is responsible for this QB Jets-land coverage again?

So many of us in the journalism business have had to get used to new things. New age of versatility that has us do print, Internet, radio and TV. Twitter. The 24-hour news cycle. The whole business has changed, and we all probably knew this day was coming. But it'll be an eerie day this fall: The storied New Orleans Times-Picayune, born in 1837, will stop publishing seven days a week. It'll publish three days a week -- Wednesday, Friday and Sunday.

So New Orleans Saints fans won't read about their team in the city newspaper until Wednesday after the game and will only get stories about the Saints three days a week. Now Saints fans know how Carolina Panthers fans feel. The Charlotte Observer publishes seven days a week, but they don't really cover the Panthers but three days a week anyway, and use the other four days of the week to link stories written about the Panthers by the Associated Press.

(Maybe three people get what I'm talking about and my joke falls flat as usual)

Jokes aside, it is not a good sign "The Times-Picayune" is only going to three days of publishing. It also isn't a hugely shocking development.

The union filed the claim in U.S. District Court in Minnesota, with NFLPA attorney Jeffrey Kessler (his nickname should be The Groundhog; seeing it always makes me think we're about to see six more weeks of legal wrangling)

No, that should not be his nickname.

"Never.''

-- Tim Tebow, asked when the last time he'd made a special teams tackle. Tebow could be used as the personal protector -- the up back -- on the Jets' punt team.

QB Jetsland baby!

You can clearly see Peter King is not at fault for the overhyping of QB Jets in using a quote from QB Jets as "Quote of the Week II." It's every other media member's fault, but not Peter's fault.

Wished I had Aladdin's Lamp on my return flight from London last Monday, so I could have wished that the fellow sitting across the aisle who took his shoes and socks off before we took off had actually washed his feet some time in the previous three days. Nothing like the look of dark-gray crossed feet every few minutes for seven hours.

I'm sure the fellow across the aisle appreciated the creepy guy who was staring at this feet over the entire flight as well. Where does Peter run into these people? I feel like Peter wills these strange things to happen just so he can write about them in MMQB.

1. It's entirely possible that I slept so well at my brother's home for a variety of reasons, but I think it has a lot to do with noise. I live in Manhattan, on the 16th floor of a high-rise. You can turn the noise down, but you can never shut it off. My brother Ken lives in a village in Northamptonshire, 80 minutes north of London. At night -- or, really, after the school next door lets out for the day -- there is ... nothing. No noise. The birds in the morning sound like a rooster, relatively speaking. And one night there, I slept nine hours. Don't remember a thing. That never happens to me. Maybe silence is more important in our lives than we think -- or than I've thought.

Yes, maybe silence may be important to maintain a good sleep. Revolutionary thoughts are Peter King's forte.

The NFL (and other American pro sports) could learn something from a game like cricket. No music. No exploding scoreboards. There's the game, and discussion in the stands.

When was the last time Peter went to a football game and actually sat in the stands? Most NFL games I have been to there is a discussion in the stands about the game, there are no exploding scoreboards, and yes, the music is loud but can be tuned out if you are paying attention to the game. I'm not a huge fan of loud noises, but I don't know if turning NFL stadiums into a cricket stadium is the right direction to go either.

I realize we're beyond that. And I may not be in the majority here, and I may be Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino.

No, Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino is awesome. Wanting NFL games to be more like cricket games is not awesome.

3. I do not envy you, NBC peers, on your Olympic travels to London. It's a great, great city, but the traffic is insane. Take the Tube a bunch. Clean, fast, well-marked, everywhere.

Peter King, travel guide.

2. I think here's a postscript to the Alex Smith comments about the garbage-time yards by the Panthers last season. First, Smith's quote, the one that rankled the Panthers, came when he was asked about his lack of big-yardage passing games. "I think that's a totally overblown stat,'' Smith said. "Because if you're losing games in the second half, guess what? You're like the Carolina Panthers and you're going no-huddle the entire second half and, yeah, Cam Newton threw for a lot of 300-yard games, that's great. You're not winning, though."

The fact it has been disproven that Newton threw for more yardage in the second half than the first half, so Smith really has no point, aside...is Alex Smith really giving us the whole "it's all about winning games" after his first NFL season out of six seasons where he led the 49ers to a winning record? It's odd to me. In the past, if the 49ers had Alex Smith as their quarterback, they weren't winning games partially due to his presence as their quarterback, but he has one good season and turns into the "passing yards are for losers" guy.

8. I think this is my one post-script on the move of the trading deadline: I asked Miami GM Jeff Ireland if being 0-7 would have been very different in terms of making moves than being 0-5. In other words, would he have been more motivated to make trades two weeks later last year. He said no.

"I wasn't thinking about playing for the future at 0-7,'' he said. "I was thinking about what could we do to win now.''

"I was thinking about saving my job and knew if I started trading away players I was going to see to it my team lost more games and I would get fired."

That's why, despite the Kyle Orton story I told earlier in the column, I don't think a two-week extension to the deadline will be earth-shaking.

Plus it would have saved Bill Polian's job and helped the Colts miss out on getting a franchise quarterback in the draft, while relying on a veteran who only had 2-3 more years left. Polian needed a quarterback to help mask the somewhat deficient roster he had helped to build over the years.

a. Rondo rocks. What a ballplayer.

If only he could score more points or miraculously give the Celtics better players to compete with the Heat.

f. Josh Reddick has 13 home runs. Prince Fielder, Adrian Gonzalez and Jayson Werth have 14 home runs, combined.

Josh Reddick is a better hitter than Prince Fielder, Adrian Gonzalez, and Jayson Werth combined! That's what this statistic means!

k. In the Meaningless Factoids of My Life Dept: My other two songs of the week can stay in my head forever as far as I'm concerned: Mean, by Taylor Swift. Great message, great voice.

Of course Peter King would like Taylor Swift. She really doesn't have a great voice either, but I'm not sure if I can expect a better comment from a diehard U2 fan.

p. Coffeenerdness: If I could just listen to the Forks Over Knives people, I'd go to a soy latte. As the young would say, OMG.

Peter is using "OMG" in his columns and talking about how he likes Taylor Swift. Is this a half-assed mid-life crisis coming on? Next thing we know, Peter will buy a semi-sporty new car and begin to sort of ogle younger women while at the beach, but still recognize the beauty of his own wife.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

3 comments Woody Paige Closes His Eyes and Wishes It Will All Go Away

Woody Paige is very sad. Tim Tebow has not been named the starter for the Denver Broncos. Woody has written approximately 97 columns about how great Tebow is and how he needs to be the Broncos starter. Unfortunately, the John Fox coaching staff is the second Broncos coaching staff that seems to disagree with Woody about Tebow's current starting potential. But, oh, Woody Paige isn't defeated quite yet. He thinks if he writes enough about Tebow he can get him back in the starting spot for the Broncos. Of course, first Tebow has to take over the backup quarterback job from Brady Quinn.

In the first article, Woody says Tebow will be the starter at some point and then plays around with facts about John Fox in order to give his readers the impression Fox is an open-minded coach when it comes to playing young quarterbacks or switching quarterbacks on the fly. He's not. What's interesting is that Woody will put the words "open competition" in parenthesis during this column, as an acknowledgment that Fox didn't give an open competition for the starting quarterback job, yet he expects Fox to be more open minded in the future for some reason.

Tonight, in the Broncos' first exhibition at home, Orton, who was on the sideline for the last two regular-season games at home, is the starter — and will be followed by Tebow and Brady Quinn, but not necessarily in that order.

Don't forget Adam Weber. He's in the mix as well.

New coach John Fox's "open competition" is closed. No matter how well Tebow or Quinn plays in this exhibition, Orton will begin the season at quarterback.

What I think is really funny is that Woody Paige has been talking for months about the open competition at quarterback and how Tim Tebow was going to get a fair shot to win the starting job...fully expecting Tebow to be named the starter of course. Now Woody is being all snide and sarcastic at the idea of "open" quarterback competition in Denver. I knew there wouldn't be an open competition and probably posted my opinion too often on this blog. Woody cited, and continues to cite in this article, Fox’s past in Carolina as a reason why Tebow would have a chance at the starting quarterback job. I just laughed at this because the only way Fox would change quarterbacks in Carolina was based on injury or death to his starter.

However, in my opinion, he won't close the season at quarterback.

If the Broncos are out of the playoff chase at that point, this is quite likely. What does it tell Woody the Broncos won’t start Tebow when they still have a chance to be competitive, but will start him when they are out of the playoff race? This happened last year as well. Apparently it tells Woody nothing.

Unlike last year, Quinn has entered the conversation — based on performances in the team's scrimmages and at Dallas, with and against scrubs.

I’ve always enjoyed how Woody takes Tebow’s success and failure personally. He has written at least 3-4 articles about what a shithead Kyle Orton is and now he is basically saying Brady Quinn only looks good when going against other scrubs. He always finds a way to demean other quarterbacks in an effort to propel his boy Tebow into the starting gig.

Unlike his predecessor, who told me he would never change quarterbacks in a game or a season (barring injury), Fox has shown a willingness and necessity to do both.

I would love to learn a little bit about this alternate universe I never got to experience in the time John Fox was the head coach of the Carolina Panthers. Apparently in this alternate universe he had a willingness to switch quarterbacks based on performance and not based on an edict sent from the owner, the General Manager cutting Fox's favorite starter or because of an injury to Fox's favorite starter. He tends to stick with his guys to the very bitter end.

In 2010 Moore beat out prized rookie Clausen to start the season.

Now Woody Paige will give examples of this. Not surprisingly he only includes last year when Fox showed a “willingness” to switch quarterbacks. I say it is not surprising because Jake Delhomme was cut from the roster for the simple reason he would have been the starter had he been on the roster. Fox’s “willingness” to switch quarterbacks was forced on him by the front office and by injuries to Fox's other "guy," Matt Moore. Woody fails to mention this of course. Facts? Who needs those?

But after Moore suffered a concussion and four interceptions and a fumble, Clausen took over.

Fox was willing to play Clausen because Moore wasn’t active for the game. It beat not having a quarterback start the game and running the Wildcat offense all game, though rather than have Chris Weinke throw too many passes in a game Fox had the offense run the Wildcat offense and refused to throw the ball for nearly an entire game.

I'm not kidding.

However, when Clausen struggled for three games, Moore was named starter again.

Basically, Fox switched back to the more-veteran quarterback that he preferred anyway. This is something Fox does. He prefers veteran quarterbacks to young quarterbacks.

In a game against the Saints, Moore was hurt again. Clausen went in, played poorly and was yanked for another rookie, Pike.

Pike was put in the game during the fourth quarter because Clausen performed poorly. As if anyone needs further proof Fox isn’t open to young quarterbacks starting NFL games, the Panthers then signed Brian St. Pierre, who was retired, and 5 days later he started a game for the Panthers.

John Fox would rather have signed a veteran quarterback off the street and 5 days later have him start an NFL game, than start Clausen. This says a lot about Clausen’s talent level and about how Fox feels about young quarterbacks.

The Panthers signed journeyman backup St. Pierre, who started one game — and stunk.

He wasn’t absolutely terrible for a guy who walked off the street 5 days earlier and then was forced to start an NFL game.

If Orton had wound up with the Dolphins, the Broncos' situation would be totally different — with comparisons and a real open competition in camp and exhibitions between Quinn and Tebow.

If Orton went to Miami, the Broncos would now be in the situation where they didn’t have an NFL caliber starting quarterback on the roster. Apparently this is a preferable situation in the opinion of Woody Paige.

I also like how Woody is now bitter towards John Fox that there wasn’t a “real” open competition in camp. He blatantly ignored Fox’s record as an NFL head coach when he was getting all jittery-excited at the thought his favorite little man Tim Tebow might have a shot at being a starter this year. Anyone who has followed Fox’s coaching career would know Orton would have that starting job, almost regardless of what Tebow did. Like any biased beat writer, Woody reports on what he wants to happen rather than reporting on reality.

In one scenario for the Broncos — if, say, they keep the three quarterbacks and Quinn were to start 12 games — the outlay to quarterbacks would be more than $21 million, which is Manning money.

And of course this is Kyle Orton’s fault for making so much money and being a quality NFL starter. It definitely isn’t Tim Tebow’s fault, even though he has been given a lump sum of $6.28 million for this year to be the 3rd quarterback on the depth chart. God knows if Kyle Orton was the backup and made $6.28 million then Woody Paige wouldn’t let us hear the end of how terrible Orton truly is.

So then after writing that Tebow will be the starter by the end of year, due to the Broncos not making the playoffs based completely on the terrible play of Kyle Orton, imagine Woody's horror when Mike Silver of Yahoo Sports wrote an article saying the Broncos players liked Orton better over Tebow and saying an undrafted heathen devil named Adam Weber was looking better than Tebow in camp.

This is a direct attack on the Church of Tebow and must be met with anger and derision by Woody. By saying anything negative about Tebow's football skills, Mike Silver was also attacking the very foundation of the Church of Tebow that Woody belongs to. The foundation being, "any criticism of Tim Tebow must always been taken personally and is not to be taken as an independent and fair evaluation of his current performance." So saying Tebow isn't the best quarterback on the Broncos roster AND his teammates agreeing is seen as completely counting Tim Tebow out and this pisses Woody Paige off.

Go ahead, give up on Tim Tebow.

Gang-tackle him, and use whatever mechanically flawed arm motion and mentally faulty thought process you've got to fling the young quarterback to the curb.

I think journalism schools should use Peter King's material on Brett Favre from about 1998-2008 and Woody Paige's columns on Tim Tebow as great examples of sports writers getting too emotionally involved with the athletes they cover. I'm at the point I think Woody Paige would jump on a grenade or murder a person for Tim Tebow.

Berate and belittle him, demean and demote him, sneer and jeer at him, barrel and Merril him, but Tim is stronger of mind, body, soul and heart than you are.

I can’t believe the Denver Post allows Woody Paige to write shit like this for them. These are the words of an adolescent child who isn’t getting his/her way, not the written words of a grown man who is supposed to be very good at his chosen career.

Tebow "can't play. He can't throw," Esiason was quoted as saying, and Beuerlein offered, "I'd say he's closer to third-teamer than a first-teamer."

Oh no! Criticism of Tim Tebow! Can’t the media just leave Tebow alone when it comes to evaluating his football skills and only pay attention to what a good person he is? It’s so unfair to him. Why can’t the cameras follow Tebow around telling word of his good deeds and not critique his skills at football?

In a Yahoo Sports article, veteran NFL writer Mike Silver wrote he was told by "one highly knowledgeable member of the (Broncos) organization Monday: 'If everything was totally equal, and this were a competition based only on performance at this camp, Tebow would probably be the fourth-string guy. (Kyle) Orton is far and away the best, and Tebow's way behind (Brady) Quinn too. And I'm telling you, Adam Weber is flat-out better right now.' "

The key part about this group of sentences are the last words in these group of sentences. “Right now.” This is the part Woody Paige and other overly-supportive Tebow fans don’t get and is what causes them to get all up in arms over any criticism of Tebow. This statement by the unknown Broncos official isn’t a complete indictment of Tebow as a person or Tebow’s quarterback skills two years from now, but is the reality of his skills right now.

ESPN analyst Merril Hoge is the engineer on this runaway locomotive, but so many others — inside and outside the Broncos — are traveling along for the ride.

I'm not jumping aboard.

Of course Woody isn’t jumping aboard. He is not capable of being impartial when the topic of Tim Tebow comes up in discussion, so he throws all ability to reason out the window.

Less than a month ago, Tebow was deemed to be the Broncos' starter —

By you. He was deemed the starter by you. The head coach for the Broncos, John Fox, stated there was a competition for this position. Even you, Woody Paige, have stated repeatedly there was a quarterback competition for the starting job. Let’s not let the details get in the way of Woody Paige writing his column though.

the returning starter.

Tebow was the returning starter under a different head coach and the only reason Tebow started at the end of the year was because the Broncos were out of contention and Josh McDaniels had nothing to lose by starting Tebow to see what he can do. Though Tebow didn't do poorly, saying he was the returning starter is a bit misleading.

And Orton, for those who have forgotten, was about to be traded to Miami — at his own and the Broncos' wishes.

Because he is an NFL quality starter and doesn’t want to sit behind a lesser quarterback. That's why he wanted to be traded. I can’t really blame him for feeling this way.

Much has been made of Orton's lack of a running game and a miserable defense in such starts as Oakland (59-14), San Diego (35-14) and Arizona (43-14). Tebow had the same backs and defense at Oakland (39-23) and at home against Houston (24-23) and San Diego (33-28).

Tebow had the same defensive backs in those three games, but the defense also gave up 137 points in Orton’s three starts described here and the defense gave up 95 points in Tebow’s three starts described here. That’s 42 less points the defense gave up, or two touchdowns per game, when Tebow started. So while Orton and Tebow had the same defense, the defense played better when Tebow was the starter. Clearly this is the product of the defense responding to Tebow's massive intangibles and leadership.

So what explains why many of the current players are on record as saying they want Orton to be the starter in 2011. If the defense doesn't play well for Orton and he doesn't have the world famous intangibles like Tebow does...so why do the Broncos players prefer Orton? Perhaps Woody should think about this and then try to figure the answer out.

In the 13 games Orton started, the Broncos scored touchdowns inside the red zone on 17 of 104 trips (one on a Tebow run). With Tebow as the starter, the Broncos scored touchdowns 6-of-8 times inside the 20.

Tebow is great in the red zone. This means he is valuable to have when the Broncos are in the red zone and doesn’t mean he is ready to be an NFL starter.

When the deal with the Dolphins couldn't be completed, Orton was back at No. 1, and Tebow was dropped to No. 2. The so- called "open competition" never really developed because Tebow and Quinn rarely worked with the first unit.

Have you noticed that Tebow’s fall on the depth chart is everyone else’s fault except for his? I’m not saying Tebow wasn’t hurt by John Fox’s love for a veteran quarterback or he wasn’t hurt by the lockout, but Woody has never pinned the fall in the depth chart on anything Tebow did or didn’t do. Woody has no reason for Tebow to be the starter, he only has reasons Kyle Orton and Brady Quinn suck.

This was clear: The lack of organized team activities hurt Tebow's progress;

True. Quinn and Orton were learning a new offense as well and quarterbacks were allowed to practice on their own during the lockout, so each quarterback was on a similar playing field...the difference is Tebow just doesn't have the experience Orton has right now.

the new offense was not tailored to Tebow's shotgun strengths;

Translation: It was a pro-style offense, not the offense he ran at the University of Florida under Urban Meyer.

If Cam Newton fails in Carolina, can he use the fact the Panthers don’t use the spread-style option style offense that he ran at Auburn under Gus Malzahn as a reason?

So again, it isn’t Tebow’s fault he is falling down the depth chart, he just doesn’t have the skills right now to run the pro-style offense that John Fox prefers. For any other quarterback, this would be a bad thing and he would be criticized (see: Alex Smith), but for Tebow this is an excuse to be used.

and the adjustments in Tebow's throwing mechanics and his practices under center were not going as smoothly as everyone wanted.

Based on this statement, wouldn’t you say the adjustments in Tebow’s mechanics are hard to change and could make it hard for Tebow to be a starting NFL quarterback? This is essentially what Merril Hoge criticized Tim Tebow for that got Woody Paige all worked up. So apparently Woody agrees in part with Merril Hoge, he just doesn’t come to the hard conclusion Hoge came to.

In the first exhibition, Orton led the Broncos inside the Cowboys' 10 — and a field goal was the result. Tebow completed a 43-yard pass (from under center), but the drive was stalled at the Cowboys' 24, and the Broncos kicked another field goal. In his fourth series, Tebow was the beneficiary of an interception, and set up at the 7-yard line. He ran for a touchdown that was called back because of a holding penalty. The Broncos kicked a third field goal.

In the fourth quarter, Quinn led touchdown drives of 39 and 79 yards.

Tebow was dropped to No. 3.

In the Bills' exhibition, Orton was at quarterback for two touchdowns, Quinn for one and a field goal. Tebow barely played.

I hope Woody does know coaches decide on the depth chart based on more evidence than just what happens in preseason games. So we can’t conclude Tebow’s move to 3rd on the depth chart is because solely on what happened in the games.

Now, if "one highly knowledgeable member of the Broncos organization" is correct, perhaps Weber will get playing time against the Seahawks and the Cardinals, and Tebow will be dropped to No. 4.

Weber did not get playing time against the Seahawks, so Tim Tebow probably will stay at #3. Even if the knowledgeable member of the organization is correct and Weber versus Tebow are competing for the 3rd quarterback spot, it may not matter which quarterback looks better because Tebow is going to stick on the roster no matter what happens. He is a 1st round pick from 2010 and incredibly popular, there is no way he will be cut this year in favor of Adam Weber.

Earlier this month ESPN's Rick Reilly quoted John Elway as saying Tebow "didn't get an offseason to work on (playing from the pocket). He didn't get much of that in college. And it's a completely different thing than the shotgun. Plus, he's only had one (NFL) season. But he's amazing football player. I'd never give up on Tim Tebow."

When quoting something Rick Reilly has said in order to help prove your own point, please understand this is basically admitting that you have no point. Even in the case of Reilly quoting John Elway, I would be suspicious of something Reilly has printed.

What’s interesting is Woody Paige is proving my major criticism of the Church of Tebow followers. They take any criticism as an insult and an indication the person saying that criticism believes that Tebow will NEVER get be an NFL quarterback. That’s not much of what Mike Silver’s column said. It indicated Tebow wasn’t the third best quarterback on the roster right now. Obviously things can change in a few years and Adam Weber won’t make the roster at the expense of Tim Tebow for this year. The article didn’t say the Broncos organization had given up on Tebow, but any criticism of Tebow has to be blown out of proportion and made to be a bigger deal than it is. The Church of Tebow does not allow for criticism of their idol.

I didn't give up on Steve Young or John Elway, and I won't give up on Tim Tebow, either.

But so many others have — prematurely.

It is annoying how Woody Paige refuses to give up on Tim Tebow, but he also refuses to give Kyle Orton the benefit of the doubt. It’s like Woody can’t accept that Tebow isn’t the best quarterback on the roster right now and has to demean the coaches, the front office or anyone else who indicates the reality of the situation. How sad for him.