Showing posts with label josh mcdaniels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label josh mcdaniels. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

8 comments MMQB Review: Peter Goes to Bat for Darren Sharper's Hall of Fame Rights Edition

Peter King discussed the most controversial and worst play call in the history of the NFL (until the next controversial and worst play call occurs) in last week's MMQB. He also sort of screwed up his "Goat of the Week" again by placing the blame for the last offensive play by the Seahawks on one person. This week in the first offseason MMQB, Peter has Tom Brady explain the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl, clarifies that when he said he would resign from the Pro Football Hall of Fame selection committee if Darren Sharper wasn't on the ballot by stating "rulebook," is still overly-fascination with the urban music Pete Carroll plays at practice and is upset he'll have to drink his piss passing as a beer out of a can from now on. Oh, that beer is Rolling Rock, which interestingly is what I'd rather be hit by then drink the beer.

It’s understandable when a stunning event overwhelms a career-defining event, the way it did in Super Bowl XLIX eight days ago. We spent three or four days piling on Pete Carroll for a call that seemed (and still seems) foolhardy, a decision that cost Seattle a second straight Super Bowl victory and a decision vital to the fourth Super Bowl title of the Belichick/Brady Era. Heck, Matt Lauer of the “Today Show” flew to Seattle and sat down with Carroll for 20 empathetic minutes.

Matt Lauer was probably just trying to get away from everyone at the "Today Show" who secretly hate him. He would volunteer to do an interview pretty much anywhere as long as people stop accusing him of trying to get his co-anchors and NBC network executives fired.

Now it’s day eight, and it’s time for New England quarterback Tom Brady to get his due. Offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels too. And important contributors Shane Vereen, Julian Edelman,

I think we all know that Julian Edelman got his due already. IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.

I am going to isolate on Brady and McDaniels here, but that does not mean the others shouldn’t get a figurative Gatorade bath too.

Peter is going to give Brady and McDaniels a tongue bath. Everyone else gets a Gatorade bath.

It should not be forgotten or in any way overshadowed by the Malcolm Butler interception—gigantic, obviously, in its own right—because when the career of Tom Brady is put in a time capsule, this is the day, this is the quarter, these are the two drives, that should be best remembered. They show perfectly what made Brady a quarterback for the ages. All ages.

All ages. INCLUDING THE TRIASSIC PERIOD!

I spoke to Brady for an hour the other day, to get his play-by-play on the last two drives. And I spoke to McDaniels alone at length in the crazy post-game scrum. This is their story. It has a Spielberg twist on the final play that just makes it better. 

So by "a Spielberg twist" I'm assuming Peter means it will be an overly-long and very boring twist on the final play. Also, no children will be hurt so that probably ends any drama about that as well.

Brady: “I watched a lot of tape. A lot.

Mostly Brady watched tape of the previous "Walking Dead" seasons in order to catch up before the mid-season premiere, but he did learn a lot about how to avoid pressure in his face and how to escape when in a tight space by watching the show.

Brady: “They’d allowed the fewest big plays of any team all season, and you saw pretty early why you don’t want to go into the Super Bowl throwing up a bunch of posts, a bunch of ‘nine’ routes. [‘Go’ routes.] Richard Sherman picks off the go route every time you throw it. The plan was to exploit other parts of the field—but short parts of the field. Michael Bennett rushes from everywhere. Cliff Avril kills people. They believe in what they do. We countered that by saying, ‘Okay, here’s what we’re pretty good at: Space the field, find the soft spots, be satisfied with the four-yard gain, be happy with the four-yard gain. We were gonna be happy with a two-yard gain.”

I didn't think prior to the Super Bowl that the Patriots could throw these short routes and have success against the Seahawks. The difference is that the Patriots were happy with a short gain. That's probably why the Panthers never really get blown out by the Seahawks, because Mike Shula is ALWAYS happy with a two or four yard gain. That's his dream scenario. In fact, every play he calls is designed to get a two or four yard gain.

McDaniels: “The thing nobody talks about with Seattle is their ability to create disruptive plays.

I wouldn't say "nobody" talks about that. I think anyone who sees the Seahawks play know they rarely miss a chance to get a turnover or cause a fumble.

In fact, I have this thing I do during the first half of our games. I write down on my play sheet what I want to talk about to the team at halftime.

Oh. I'm pretty sure that's a "thing" that most offensive and defensive coaches do at halftime.

Josh McDaniels: "I have this thing I do prior to a game. I choose for our offense to practice plays I believe will work against the opposing team's defense and then I put together a group of plays that we will use during the game to score points. The offense then practices these plays during the week. I call it a 'game plan' and it's a very effective way of using strategy to beat an opposing team."

In 72 offensive plays in Super Bowl XLIX, New England did not fumble.

Well, the Patriots are good at not fumbling anyway, but point taken.

In the regular season, Brady was among the most deliberate quarterbacks in the league in getting rid of the ball, at 2.39 seconds per pass drop, according to Pro Football Focus. On second down he took 1.01 seconds to dump a slip-screen to Brandon LaFell on the right side. Gain of four. Third and 14.

Brady: “Would this have been a four-down situation here? I don’t know. The way it worked, Sherman had Gronkowski. Danny had a deeper incut. He was the go-to guy, but they squeezed him on defense, so I couldn’t go there. Now LaFell … He had a deep comeback. When you wait for a guy—what does he run the 40 in, and what can he run 25 yards in? Maybe 2.8 seconds, three seconds? You have to wait for him.

Translation: Brandon LaFell is a lot of things. Fast is not one of those things.

So I have to make the calculated decision. I had the ball quite a while there.

Me: “Well, 3.48 seconds, to be exact.”

Okay Peter, take a step back for a second. Let's allow Tom to tell the story. Gregg Easterbrook does not approve of your hyperspecificity.

Brady: “Probably the longest time I had all game. Julian was the last option I had on the play, and there he was, in the middle.”

Edelman caught it, bounced off Kam Chancellor, and gained 21.

Peter leaves out the part where it looks like Edelman had a concussion based on the hit he took from Chancellor. Which is fine, but it's fun how he leaves that part out.

Now, for the only time in his last 18 plays, Brady errs. Edelman runs a quick fake post on Simon, pirouettes to the left, leaving Simon in the dust, and turns to Brady—who throws a line drive too high. Too hard, and too high. But a lesson to him. And a lesson to McDaniels.

McDaniels did does a thing that he will usually do during a game, which is make notes and remind Tom Brady after the drive is over to not throw incomplete passes.

Brady: “There’s a mental part to a football throw and a physical part. The mental part is being decisive. Every throw is risk-reward. When you’ve played for 15 years, you have what I call ‘no-fear throws.’ Josh calls them that too. You’re confident, you know you’ve got it, and you just rip it. Some other throws, just before you let the ball go, you’re still not quite convinced that’s what you want to do...Josh has done such a good job trying to break down the mental blocks. Some of those decisions go right up to the time before the ball leaves your fingertips. On that one, it was, like, yes yes yes, NO! On my two interceptions in the game, the first one I should have called time because I just didn’t like what I saw, and then it was too late when I made the throw. Dumb throw.

I mock Gregg Easterbrook because his solution to everything seems to be, "Just call a timeout," but when an offense is in the red zone and the quarterback doesn't like what he sees then calling a timeout would be a smart move. Every time the defense or offense may see something they don't like, that's not always the best time to call a timeout.

Thomas and Amendola were on the end line, Thomas to Amendola’s right, and Brady threw hard to the outside of Amendola, away from Thomas. Touchdown. Seattle 24-21.

Brady: “Earl was indecisive, thank God.”

Russell Wilson says God had nothing to do with the touchdown because he was too busy trying to concoct ways for the Seahawks to score points on the next possession. God can only cheer for one team, Tom Brady!

Before the drive started, McDaniels said to Brady: “I got some things I’m gonna go with. I’m gonna pull ’em from everywhere.”

You know, if the Patriots still had Tim Tebow then they wouldn't have to pull 'em from everywhere. They could just let him drop back in the pocket and create the magic the Patriots would need to win the game.

Second-and-10 at the Seattle 32, 4:05 to play. Field-goal range. But no settling now.

Brady: “So K.J. Wright walks up to Gronk. We know it’s man. Same coverage Wright had on the touchdown pass to Gronk earlier. So if you’re K.J. Wright, you’re thinking, ‘I don’t want to get beat on a TD pass again,’ and he plays him high.

You'd think the NFL would drug test these players or K.J. Wright would know better than to play in the Super Bowl high. I guess not.

Gronk sells the go route, and runs the stop route. Gronk knew it. Later, he told me, ‘As soon as the ball was snapped, I knew you were throwing it to me.’ Gronk’s a tough matchup. I’ve seen it for a long time. You put two guys on him, we got three wideouts single-covered. We’ll win those, somewhere. Big fast, unbelievable hands. He’s got vacuum hands.”

Plus, it helped that pretty much any time a linebacker is covering Gronkowski he has the advantage.

Vereen on a quick snap, up the middle for seven. Seattle was tiring now. This was the 15th round of a 15-round donnybrook, and the Seahawks were on the ropes. Brady to LaFell—with no one covering him—for seven.

Really Bill Simmons? LaFell had no one covering him? How could the Seahawks run a defense without anyone covering a receiver? This is not something the Seahawks should do. 

Brady: “After the last drive, I went to the sidelines and told Josh, ‘Josh, come back to that call. Please come back to that call.’ I knew even before the call came in what it was going to be. I knew how it was going to play out. Earl in same place. Simon in same spot. Only this time, they ended up blitzing, really a max blitz, creating one-on-one with Jules.

Stop me before I blitz again! Blitzing never works. If the Seahawks had just run a simple four man rush, surely they would have ended up stopping the Patriots from scoring a touchdown here and then gotten a pick-six on the next play that would have won the game for the Seahawks. Surely, this would have happened.

Edelman pushed off Simon, mildly, on the slant, then pirouetted again, just like last time. Only this time the throw wasn’t 115 miles an hour, and it wasn’t high.

Unlike K.J. Wright, who was still playing high.

Touchdown. New England 28, Seattle 24.

Immediately, McDaniels pointed at Brady. The NFL Films cameras captured Brady pointing at McDaniels. The message from each man was simple.

Brady: It's the Super Bowl and we are now winning. I hope God doesn't help the Seahawks win the game.

McDaniels: I wonder if any good head coaching jobs will open up next offseason? Would anyone suspect anything if Bill Belichick got in a fiery car crash next offseason if no good jobs do open up? Wait, do I even want this job without Brady as my quarterback? Man, what a difficult decision for me to make right now. Fortunately I don't have to make that decision right now. Speaking of decisions, I haven't eaten anything and I am really hungry. What should I eat after this game is over? Oh, here comes Tom pointing at me and yelling. I guess I better focus.

"Yeah Tom, great throw!"

McDaniels: You executed the play exactly how it should have been done.

Brady: You trusted me on the same play again—and this time I didn’t let you down!

I like my fake conversation better. Also, why wouldn't Josh McDaniels trust Tom Brady to run the same play again? Is there any reason Tom Brady couldn't be trusted to throw the ball on the same play again?

Brady: “I had a nice moment with my wife Tuesday morning.

Earmuffs for the children!

Monday was taken up with getting home, and I finally had a chance to sleep Monday night … We woke up Tuesday, and, now, she’s woken up twice next to me after Super Bowl losses, and [for those] I was like, ‘The game’s today, right? What I just had was a nightmare, right? That didn’t really happen, right?’ And this time, I just looked at her and it was, it was …”

Pause. Three, four seconds.

Me: “What happened? What’d you say?”

I always love Peter's interview style. It makes Billy Bush look like a hard-lined investigative reporter. I imagine Peter has his head in his hand staring lovingly like he's just entranced with what the interviewee is saying, no matter who he is interviewing.

Brady: “It was just special. Just pretty special.”

Peter King: What do you mean special? As special as you are, you little rascal? (starts tickling Tom Brady's tummy)

One of the most important things facing Roger Goodell this offseason (you mean there’s more?) is to clear the police blotter of the nagging cheating scandals/problems that have surfaced in the last couple of months.

And obviously "clearing the blotter" doesn't mean Goodell will deal with the scandals/problems that he personally has created over the last couple of months. Plug those ears and keep walking...

New England is cooperating with the investigation by Ted Wells and Jeff Pash into allegations brought by Indianapolis GM Ryan Grigson that one or more footballs the Patriots used in the AFC title game were significantly underinflated. There’s no timetable for the investigation, but I wouldn’t think a decision is imminent; it took Wells 14 weeks to finish his probe into the Miami bullying scandal, and he’s been on the job here only two-and-a-half weeks.

Ted Wells is an attorney. There's no way he's speeding the process up. The longer he keeps "investigating" the more money he racks up in hourly fees he can charge the NFL. Why speed things up when you are getting paid?

(gets angry comments from the attorneys who read this post)

Jerry Rice … Now, this is a strange one. Rice, clearly defending Joe Montana as comparisons between Montana and Tom Brady mount, has been critical of the Patriots for cheating. (Join the outside-of-six-northeastern-states club.) Now comes Rice’s admission, on an ESPN feature in January, that he used Stickum during his NFL career on his already-tacky gloves. Stickum was banned by the league in 1981, and Rice’s NFL career began in 1985. As he said in the ESPN piece: “I know this might be a little illegal, guys, but you put a little spray, a little Stickum on [the gloves] to make sure that texture is a little sticky.”

I know, baseball writers are shocked that previous generations of athletes were doing whatever they could in order to gain an edge over their opponent. They all thought cheating started with the Steroid Era, so I'm sure football writers are just as confused about Rice's comments. You mean other generations of football players tried to gain an advantage by engaging in some cheating? Unconceivable. The modern generation of players are the only ones who will try to cheat, so how can heroes from a prior generation turn out to be cheaters as well?

And one more thing: Rice should tell us which cheating is allowable and which is reprehensible, since he knows so well.

That's an easy one. It's fine for Rice to cheat a little and it's not fine for other teams/players to cheat.

On Darren Sharper

So some media people, and quite a few fans, picked up on my note, and the reaction was intense: How can you consider a man sitting in jail, accused of drugging multiple women and raping them, for the Pro Football Hall of Fame? I wish it had been that civil. But of course it wasn’t.

Yeah, people are the worst when it sounds like Peter King is Tweeting that he would resign from the Hall of Fame voting committee if Darren Sharper weren't considered for induction. People are very uncivil when it sounds like Peter capes up for an accused rapist. What's wrong with everyone else?

Here is what Peter Tweeted.

As usual, Peter misses the point. A lot of the reaction wasn't that Sharper was on the list, but Peter appeared to feel very, very strongly that he would up and quit the Hall of Fame selection committee if Sharper weren't included on the ballot. It's not that I disagree with Peter, but it's the way he went about stating his point. Peter seems to think it's the policy that people primarily had the issue with. I'm not sure that's true. It was that Peter was really, really strong on the point that he wanted Sharper on the ballot. It seemed a bit overboard to me and I bet it seemed that way to others. Of course, Peter misses this point completely.

To clarify the way the Pro Football Hall of Fame works, we have a bylaw that says we can consider only football-related factors in determining a candidate’s worthiness for election. For example, when Lawrence Taylor was up for election 16 years ago, we were allowed to consider the fact that Taylor missed four games once for a drug suspension, but we weren’t allowed to consider his drug use or his other off-field transgressions, of which there were many. I can’t tell you whether some voters considered the other things; I can just tell you that I considered Taylor as a football player only. He was enshrined on his first season of eligibility, 1999.

Again, Peter is missing the point. I understand that Sharper can't be kicked off the ballot for transgressions off the field. That's clear. What isn't clear is why Peter can't seem to get that basically saying, "If Darren Sharper isn't considered then I quit!" can be taken the wrong way as really fighting for a player to be on the ballot when that player has been accused multiple rapes. It sounds like Peter is really fighting for Sharper when less "stand my ground" language would have proved the point.

Maybe you would say: Don’t complicate things! It’s obvious that a very serious crime, such as murder or rape, should bar a candidate from the Hall. Obvious to whom? There are 46 voters for the Hall of Fame. Do you want to leave it up to the conscience of each individual voter as to what constitutes a crime serious enough to ban a person from the Hall?

You are still completely missing the point.

Maybe you would say: Don’t complicate things! It’s obvious that a very serious crime, such as murder or rape, should bar a candidate from the Hall. Obvious to whom? There are 46 voters for the Hall of Fame. Do you want to leave it up to the conscience of each individual voter as to what constitutes a crime serious enough to ban a person from the Hall?

And still missing the reason people were upset with you on Twitter...regardless, do I want it up to the conscience of each individual voter to decide what constitutes a crime serious enough to ban a person from the Hall? Well, these are the same individual voters who are deciding which players should be in the Hall of Fame or not, so if they can figure out between Marvin Harrison or Tim Brown are Hall of Fame wide receivers then I would hope they could also figure out if murder or rape are serious enough crimes to remove a player from Hall of Fame consideration. Quite frankly, if an individual voter can't make a decision about the seriousness of rape or murder, then I don't need this individual voting for the Pro Football Hall of Fame either. I think Sharper should be removed from the ballot, but how does it make sense that I can trust Peter King to figure out which players get the privilege of entering the Pro Football Hall of Fame, but I shouldn't expect him to make a decision on whether rape or murder is serious enough of a crime to remove a player from the ballot entirely (assuming there was language that allowed this to happen, which there isn't, so it doesn't matter)?

I don’t. The voters for the Hall of Fame should consider what a player did on the field, and the influences of a coach on the game and how many games he won, and the contributions that other figures have made to the sport. Beyond that, the slope is far too slippery.

I agree with this. You know, Peter is probably right. If he's not smart enough to understand how threatening to resign from the Hall of Fame committee if Darren Sharper isn't on the ballot can be taken by the general public, I probably don't want him making decisions on the severity of any crime. So that's a good point. If Peter is thick enough to miss the issue some on Twitter had with him, I probably can't trust his decision-making overall.

On the passing of Dean Smith

In those days, the media’s access to teams wasn’t as tightly controlled as it is today (I am assuming it’s the same after a Final Four as for a big NFL playoff game). And a few reporters, including me, learned the North Carolina team would be leaving the next morning, pretty early, on the plane back to Chapel Hill. So a few of us went out to the airport. Not much security then; we went right out to an outer tarmac, where the players were waiting to board the flight home. I talked to James Worthy for a couple of minutes, and then saw Matt Doherty, another one of the players, and went up to speak to him. It was early, and I assumed most of the guys had been up much of the night celebrating. No matter. They had to get home. “Dean,” one of the North Carolina staffers told me, “wants his players back on campus for afternoon classes. If they’ve got a Tuesday afternoon class, he wants them there.”

Jim Boeheim wants you to know he doesn't give a shit if you think his program is dirty. Also, he thinks college basketball players should stay in school longer and if you ask him about one of his current players and whether that player should go to the NBA then he'll feel free to bad mouth that player and tell you how unprepared he is for the NBA. Always looking out for #1.

“Other than my parents, no one had a bigger influence on my life than coach Smith.”

—Michael Jordan, on the passing of Dean Smith.

Phil Jackson and Scottie Pippen stare quietly out the window while drinking coffee, feeling a little blue, wondering if they had not come along what people would think of Michael Jordan had he not won an NBA title or only had a couple NBA titles. 

LeGarrette Blount had 107 carries, including regular-season and playoff games. Shane Vereen had 104, Stevan Ridley 94 and Jonas Gray 93. Of course, Blount and Gray and Ridley were on the Patriots’ active roster only part of the season, but it’s a startling number, to see how New England divvied up the work in the backfield, and to see no one had to be a Pro Bowler to get the job done.

That has to be the least-accomplished world championship backfield in the Super Bowl era. Just goes to show you that you can field a great team without employing a great running back. 

Yes, a team just needs a Hall of Fame quarterback, four running backs who each have their own different attributes that make them valuable, and use a 2nd and 3rd round draft choice to grab two of these running backs. That's all. 

Factoid of the Week That May Interest Only Me

This is 10 days old, and my apologies for not getting it in the column last week. But below is the playlist from Seahawks’ practice on Wednesday before the Super Bowl. Coach Pete Carroll plays a mix of mostly hip-hop from start of practice to the end. His players (and even coaches; you should see quarterbacks coach Carl Smith moving to the music) love the fact that, instead of piped-in phony crown noise, they get to hear what they might hear in their cars driving home after practice.

I am remembering two other times when Peter King has written about the practice music that Pete Carroll uses. I get it. He uses interesting music that the players like at practice. This story was interesting the first time, repetitive the second time and now it's well-known so you can move on to something else.

Also: On Friday, a Snoop Dogg song, “Drop It Like’s Hot,” was playing at a loud decibel level early in practice—with Snoop Dogg on the sideline, a guest of the team, watching practice. (Snoop loves the Steelers, but he also loves USC, where Carroll used to coach, and the two became friends when Carroll coached the Trojans.) As the Snoop Dogg song played, Carroll jogged over to the rapper and they hugged.

After Carroll left, I went up to Snoop and said, “Must be strange, listening to your music at a Super Bowl practice, with you in the house.”

Yeah Peter, I'm sure after 20 years of success in the music business it's not weird at all for Snoop to hear his music played at all sorts of venues. I know Peter probably did not know what else to say, but hearing his music playing is just the state of being for Snoop.

A few minutes later, Snoop introduced his son, Cordell Broadus, to me. Cordell is a vaunted high school wide receiver from Las Vegas, and he signed last week to attend UCLA. He was polite and quiet when we met.

Cordell was probably confused by Peter asking him what his favorite U2 track was or Peter asked him what movie he thought Meryl Streep most embodied pure class in.

“You’ll be writing about him someday!” Snoop Dogg said.

He just did, Snoop. 

Mr. Starwood Preferred Member Travel Note of the Week

I was walking my daughter Mary Beth’s 11-year-old shepherd/lab mix Lucy on the East Side of Manhattan early Friday morning when a man, looking slightly deranged, approached us. He leaned down to the level of Lucy’s snout and said, a few octaves too loud: “GO BITE A MAILMAN!” He then walked on as though nothing happened.

Only in New York, kiddies. Only in New York.

No Peter, only everywhere there are crazy people roaming the streets. Not just New York, but nearly every city with weirdos who populate it.



If it weren't for Adam Vinatieri then Tom Brady may not even be in this discussion of best QB ever. If a few other positive things happened then the Patriots could have 7-8 or Super Bowl victories. If a few negative things happened then the Patriots could have lost five Super Bowls. It's not weird, it's just football.

Ten Things I Think I Think

2. I think that was a very impressive opening press conference for new head coach Dan Quinn in Atlanta. Now if he can just find a pass-rusher and great cover corner, he’ll be able to start playing defense the way he did in Seattle.

He might need more than one pass rusher if he's trying to put together a defense like the one he had in Seattle. Also, he will need much better safeties and better linebackers.

3. I think Peyton Manning’s playing football in 2015. Of course, by now, every one does. That’s assuming his arm, neck and legs pass muster in a team physical a month from now.

I'm not entirely sure what this means. Peter thinks Manning is playing football in 2015, unless he doesn't pass his physical. So doesn't this mean Peter expects Manning to pass his physical? That is sort of understood, right? It's like saying, "I expect the Patriots to make it to the Super Bowl next year. That's assuming they make the playoffs of course."

4. I think Marshawn Lynch is probably playing football in 2015. But that means he’ll have to be happy with the money he’ll make this year. And that is going to be a tricky process. Under almost any circumstance, Russell Wilson’s average salary in 2015 will be roughly double what the Seahawks would pay Lynch, and Lynch is not going to be fond of that. Lynch is due $7 million in salary and roster bonus this season, and the team is likely to re-do the deal to make Lynch $3 million or $4 million richer in 2015. But would that be enough, particularly when Wilson will be starting a new deal that will average something in the neighborhood of $21 million a year? 

Yes, yes, yes. The Seahawks should totally give Russell Wilson a contact worth $21 million per year. I see no reason they shouldn't do this immediately. You know what? Make it $23 million per year just to make sure Wilson stays happy and guarantee the entire contract amount for the sake of showing some goodwill.

6. I think teams thinking of signing Greg Hardy will have to consider what the NFL sanction against him will be under the league’s new domestic violence guidelines, even after his case was dismissed on Monday because his accuser did not make herself available to testify. Hardy, who is on the commissioner’s exempt list, is one of the best pass-rushers in the league and is expected to be a free agent. The NFL said on Monday that his status “remains unchanged until we fully review the matter.”

I can't wait to see what a great pass rusher Greg Hardy is once he gets paid. I don't know if he will still be elite or not. All I've heard him talk about is getting paid and I think he's also slightly crazy, so I wouldn't want to be the team that pays him.

10. I think these are my non-football thoughts of the week:

b. Had a wonderful time Friday night in New Haven, Conn., having pizza at Modern Apizza (thanks for the great recommendation, Ron Vaccaro; fantastic and fast pizza and Italian Cabernet), then watching Yale beat Dartmouth 81-66. My niece Katie’s husband, Jon Cormier, is the son of Dartmouth coach Paul Cormier, and so we had a mini-family-reunion for the evening. The outcome could have been better for the group, but I was so impressed with the effort and skill of these players, and it was fun to watch a game as a fan. One basketball note: Yale can really shoot threes.

Yale is 60th among Division-I teams at three-point shooting percentage and 96th in three-point field goals made. They did go 13-21 against Dartmouth, but overall they aren't terribly great at shooting three-point shots. Yale can't really shoot threes, it's just that Dartmouth is 265th in three-point field goal shooting percentage. Dartmouth really can't defend the three.

f. Coffeenerdness: Flat White, you’ve won me over. My grande drink of choice now.

Congratulations Flat White, your existence as a coffee-flavored water now has been justified. As an inanimate object, I know you are excited to learn Peter King has chosen YOU as his grande drink of choice. Prepare for him to drink you 6-7 times per day.

g. Beernerdness: Say it ain’t so, Anheuser Busch. Nine years after buying Rolling Rock and taking the brewing out of Latrobe, you’re taking Rolling Rock out of the classic green bottle at the Newark brewery and making it available only in cans?

How dare you do this Anheuser Busch? Peter prefers to drink his piss-flavored beer out of bottles where he can see the piss-flavored alcohol as it goes down his throat, as opposed to being surprised by the nasty stench of the piss-flavored alcohol as he drinks it out of something best served as the primary construction material at a trailer park.

Best green bottle in brewing! Best bottle in brewing! No! I’m glad it’ll still be obtainable in bottles at its other three breweries, but I fear my local establishments, 10 miles from the Newark brewery, will have Rolling Rock only in cans now. 

Rolling Rock seems like it would fit best in a can. You know, given the taste of it and all.

The Adieu Haiku

Sad with no football?  
The draft’s 80 days away.
So there’s that. Okay?


What is the point of this haiku? It serves no purpose. Much like the "Chip Kelly Wisdom of the Week," which fortunately was put out to pasture by Peter.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

12 comments Woody Paige Now Has Further Evidence the Patriots are Evil

Woody Paige is not happy Josh McDaniels is working for the New England Patriots. McDaniels was released from his contract with the Rams and was free to get employment anywhere he wanted. Out of left field for no reason, he chose to get employment as an offensive assistant (and probable offensive coordinator next year) for the Patriots, a team he has no ties to other than having worked for them four years ago under the same head coach and the same quarterback. Then New England, using their magical psychic powers about who they would play in the next round, hired McDaniels before the Steelers-Broncos game as if to pretend they don't hold supernatural powers and didn't know the Broncos would win this game. Of course McDaniels was hired close enough to the Broncos victory over the Steelers to set off Woody Paige's bullshit meter.

Woody Paige also wants us to remember Spygate and that the Patriots are super-duper cheaters who are trying to ruin the playoff chances of the Broncos by revealing John Fox's coaching secrets to the Patriots. Apparently Woody has absolutely zero regard for Mike McCoy's offensive system and misses the entire point that teams have known for a while what the Broncos are going to do, they just can't stop it because the Broncos are executing very well right now. McCoy threw in new offensive wrinkles against the Steelers and I would imagine he will do it against the Patriots as well. So it isn't like McDaniels knows the entire Broncos offense.

I do get why some people have a problem with the Patriots hiring McDaniels. It seems like they want a person on staff with familiarity to the Broncos team and system. Of course the Patriots started talking to McDaniels before the Broncos beat the Steelers, but I guess that is seen as irrelevant. The Patriots beat the Broncos just a month ago in Denver without the help of McDaniels, so that may be seen as irrelevant as well. Not to mention John Fox is running a different offensive scheme (the option and all of that) and defense from what McDaniels ran while in Denver. Again, this point is probably seen as irrelevant by Woody. I think I would have more of a problem with this if McDaniels asked to get out of his contract with the Rams to go to New England, which there isn't any indication happened. I would also have a problem if this type of thing was against the rules, which it isn't. Maybe it should be, but it isn't against the rules right now.

Josh McDaniels is reuniting with Bill Belichick for "I Spy: The Second Sequel."

I wish I could say Woody goes ahead and gets the whole "Spygate" joke out of the way, but these jokes are all through this column. Spygate happened 4-5 years (depending on when you believe Spygate started) ago. Yes, McDaniels taped six minutes of the Niners practice last year and got fined $50,000. It's over now. We should let it burn.

The Broncos certainly should not hold a walkthrough practice at the razor stadium on the eve of Saturday night's playoff game. They don't know who'll be watching, taping and stealing signals, schemes and plays.

(shaking head sadly) Simply because these jokes are easy, doesn't make it right to use them. On second thought, it doesn't seem like Woody is even joking when he says this. We wouldn't want the Broncos super-secret offensive game plan of running the ball to set up long passes to be revealed to the public.

Will Belichick and McDaniels be rehiring Steve Scarnecchia too? The former Patriots and Broncos videographer is the son of Patriots longtime assistant Dante Scarnecchia,

Dante Scarnecchia? Just like "Dante's Inferno" which took place in Hell. Do you know who lives in Hell? Satan. Do you know who doesn't like Satan? God and Jesus. Do you know who likes God and Jesus? Tim Tebow. So this game is pretty much good versus evil. I hope this puts the hiring of McDaniels in perspective. It's just another way for Satan to claim a victory for his favorite NFL team, the New England Patriots.

He was a willing, admitted participant in both Spygate and McSpygate.

Has Woody contacted the police to notify them of this yet? He really should. The Patriots clearly have hired McDaniels to tape Broncos practices in order to discover the secrets of the Broncos offense that Woody Paige claims McDaniels already knows by being the Broncos head coach over the previous two years.

What a crock of a coincidence this is.

You mean like the coincidence that the Broncos signed Willis McGahee this past offseason FULLY KNOWING he played for the Ravens last year in preparation for the Broncos playing the Steelers this year in the playoffs? So the Broncos sign a player who has played the Steelers twice a year and is familiar with their blitz schemes? What a crock of a coincidence. Next year, the Broncos play the Panthers in Carolina. Well guess who used to coach in Carolina and knows those locker rooms and players inside and out? John Fox. To make matters worse, Dante Rosario played for the Panthers and guess who he plays for now? The Broncos. You're telling me Rosario and Fox can't tell the Broncos every tendency of the players that Fox drafted and Rosario played with while in Carolina? What a crock of a coincidence. Carolina may as well forfeit that game.

Belichick brought in Kid McCoach as an "offensive assistant" just in time to interrogate him before the Patriots' rematch with the Broncos and 32 of McDaniels' players and nine assistant coaches from last season's team.

Hey, remember that time the Broncos fired Josh McDaniels and this allowed him to choose employment with any other NFL team? Yeah, me too. Did McDaniels sign a non-compete with the Broncos I'm not aware of?

The Broncos fired McDaniels on Dec. 6, 2010, because of failure as a coach (17 losses in McD's last 22 games), his poor player-people-press skills

So let me get this straight. I am supposed to believe Josh McDaniels is a failure as a coach and lacks player-people-press skills. Yet I am also supposed to believe this failure who nobody likes is not enough of a failure that it would prevent him from easily helping the Patriots beat the Broncos (again) with his knowledge of the Broncos offense. Does Woody really believe the Patriots would re-hire McDaniels as offensive coordinator for the only purpose of beating the Broncos (again) in the playoffs? I am also supposed to believe his player-people-press skills aren't so bad this wouldn't prevent him from being re-hired by one of his previous employers as an offensive assistant? It's not like the Patriots hired McDaniels only for the playoffs. He is going to be the offensive coordinator next year as well, so Belichick and the Patriots organization must have some positive feelings about McDaniels. I would have two problems with the McDaniels hiring if either of these were true:

1. McDaniels had never worked for the Patriots before. But he had. As the offensive coordinator, which not-ironically is the same position he will probably hold again next year.

2. McDaniels was only being hired for the playoffs. This isn't true though. He appears to have a permanent position with the Patriots. If McDaniels goes somewhere else after this season, this something about that may smell foul, but every indication is McDaniels will work for the Patriots organization next year as the offensive coordinator.

He can provide inside information and tendencies of players and coaches, especially the offensive coordinator he worked closely with, Mike McCoy.

There are a few problems with this statement. First, the Broncos run a different type of offense under Fox than they did under McDaniels. Second, if Josh McDaniels can immediately stop the Broncos offense because he knows the tendencies of players and coaches on the 2011 team, these are also tendencies that are shown on tape the Patriots would watch anyway in preparation for the game. Third, knowing what the Broncos are going to do hasn't been a problem all year. As much as Woody doesn't want to believe this, the Broncos' offense isn't normally fooling everyone with its complexity. It is the execution of the Broncos that has them in the AFC Divisional Round. Fourth, if Mike McCoy's offense is so similar to the one the Broncos were running under McDaniels perhaps he should offensively coordinate his players some new plays and change their tendencies. After all, wouldn't in-depth knowledge of the team be a problem if any NFL team played their ex-head coach a year or two after that ex-head coach got fired?

Some aspects of his old playbook passing offense were retained.

That's not McDaniels' or the Patriots fault some aspects of the old playbook passing offense were retained. If the Broncos played the Rams or any offensive assistant to the Broncos under McDaniels this year they would have had the same issue of the passing offense being somewhat familiar. If the Broncos don't like this, change things up.

The Patriots would claim that they know all about the Broncos after defeating them Dec. 18 in Denver.

Which would be valid reasoning. What's better to figure out what the Broncos want to do against the Patriots than to use what the Broncos did against the Patriots a month ago?

Yes, but they knew all about the Jets and other NFL teams when they chose to tape defensive coaches' signals illegally during games over a span of several seasons.

I swear this was the next sentence. This is so completely irrelevant to the game this Saturday, it hurts my head. Woody's basic point is the Patriots are cheating by not breaking any rules in hiring McDaniels because they cheated another time. It's silly. Is Woody saying the Patriots taped the Broncos practices prior to playing in December? If so, that's a serious accusation. Or is Woody simply writing two sentences back-to-back that don't make much sense together?

Although Belichick won't acknowledge it publicly, McDaniels will return to his former role as coordinator next season.

I think it is pretty much a given McDaniels will be the offensive coordinator in New England next year. That's the indication I am getting from everything I read. The Patriots have no obligation to acknowledge this.

No league rules are being violated by the Patriots in the hiring of an assistant in the postseason, but NFL commissioner Roger Goodell should order McDaniels, who was fined $50,000 last year by the commissioner, to wait to join the Patriots until O'Brien leaves.

On what basis? Does Woody really believe McDaniels can tell the Patriots anything more in-depth about the Broncos that the Patriots don't already know by playing the Broncos earlier this year? I don't get why the commissioner should order McDaniels to wait to join the Patriots until O'Brien leaves. As Woody admits, no league rules are being violated.

I love Woody's attitude of, "I don't want Josh McDaniels to coach for the Broncos anymore because he's a huge failure. I don't want McDaniels to be able to coach for any other NFL team that may compete with the Broncos at some point either because he isn't a big enough failure to cause the Broncos to scrap his entire passing playbook nor was he such a failure the Broncos fired all of the assistant coaches that worked under him."

The Broncos gave up deciding where McDaniels coached once they fired him.

What's to keep the Broncos this week from temporarily using fired Dolphins coach Tony Sparano, who faced the Patriots twice this season, as a consultant?

Nothing. Do it.

Spagnuolo coached the Giants' defense in the XLII Super Bowl victory over the Patriots. Why can't he work for the Broncos on Saturday?

He absolutely can. Get it done.

Because that's not right.

Actually Woody is correct. That wouldn't be right if the Broncos did this because there would be one big difference in the Patriots hiring McDaniels and the Broncos hiring Sparano/Spagnuolo. The difference is Josh McDaniels has ties to the Patriots and used to work for them as offensive coordinator, while Sparano/Spagnuolo have never worked for the Broncos.

The Broncos did rehire Mike Shanahan as quarterbacks coach in 1989 a few weeks after he was fired as Raiders head coach, and weeks before the Broncos played the Raiders a second time.

HOW WAS THIS ALLOWED? WHY DIDN'T THE COMMISSIONER FINE THE BRONCOS AND IMMEDIATELY DEMAND THE BLOOD OF A VIRGIN AS REPAYMENT FOR THIS TRAVESTY?

The personnel decision made by owner Pat Bowlen, not coach Dan Reeves, in midseason also was wrong.

Let's ignore the Broncos have hired the ex-head coach of a rival 20 years ago because Woody doesn't want it to be relevant to the present discussion. I like how Woody tries to explain Dan Reeves didn't make the decision, as if this absolves the Broncos from any wrongdoing compared to the Patriots hiring McDaniels. What Woody (intentionally) leaves out is that Bill Belichick is the de facto General Manager of the Patriots, so as the head coach/General Manager he would have the authority to hire a coach to his staff. It isn't like Belichick is going above Robert Kraft and his General Manager's head (because New England has no GM) to make the hire. I would assume this move has the blessing of Robert Kraft.

But it was not as blatantly shameless as the manipulative maneuver by Belichick.

Because hiring the ex-head coach of a division rival you play twice a year is so much less shameless than hiring the ex-head coach of a conference rival a team will normally play once a year at most. Because, you know, it isn't like Mike Shanahan knew the Raiders offense that he was running EARLIER THAT VERY SEASON HE WAS HIRED BY THE BRONCOS and the Broncos and Raiders play twice a year or anything. Woody sees no wrongdoing here. Move on, everyone.

Nevertheless, the Broncos will be out for revenge against the Patriots. They are 2-0 in the postseason against New England.

The Broncos will especially be out for revenge now that the Patriots had the audacity to hire the Broncos ex-head coach, the same guy Broncos fans don't like and ran out of town. How dare the Patriots hire a coach the Broncos had no interest in keeping around because he was a huge failure.

McDaniels' knowledge about the Broncos probably won't help the Patriots. He's not a read-option, run- oriented coach.

Who cares if the facts don't support the idea McDaniels will be able to provide the Patriots crack the key to the Broncos offense, who cares if the Patriots beat the Broncos earlier this year without McDaniels on staff, and who cares if the Broncos did something similar to a division rival 20 years ago. It's still a huge outrage that Josh McDaniels got fired and had the audacity to look for a job with the team he had the most prior success with. Why would McDaniels choose to go to back to work for a successful organization in the hopes of eventually getting another head coaching job? Only a crazy person would do that!

Everything he has touched in the past two years has turned to compost.

Then Woody should have nothing to worry about with McDaniels on the Patriots staff. Why is Woody throwing a hissy fit if McDaniels is so incompetent? Since McDaniels is a huge failure and everything he touches turns to shit, then the Broncos have nothing to worry about with him on staff.

The Broncos were 3-10 before McDaniels slithered away, and the Rams, under his guidance as offensive coordinator this season, finished 31st in offense, last in the league in points averaged per game (12.1), and had a 2-14 record. In his last season as coordinator with the Patriots, 2008, they didn't make the playoffs.

Of course the Patriots also went 11-5 that year without their starting quarterback. This is just a small detail and the fact remains the Patriots didn't make the playoffs with their backup quarterback, further proving McDaniels incompetence that nevertheless has Woody so worried about McDaniels' presence on the Patriots staff.

Perhaps the Hoodie-Hoodie Jr. reunion will be more advantageous to the Broncos. But it smells.

Maybe it smells, but it isn't against rules. I would have a much bigger problem if McDaniels didn't have prior work experience with Tom Brady and the Patriots offense. It's not like he was hired specifically for his vast knowledge of the Broncos not-so-complex offense. McDaniels also has knowledge of the Patriots offense and working with Tom Brady.

Honestly, if the Broncos are afraid their 2010 head coach would be able to give game-changing information to the Patriots (which it doesn't seem the Broncos are worried at all), then perhaps the Broncos should not be running a similar system to the one McDaniels instituted with Mike McCoy as his offensive coordinator in Denver. The best team will win on Saturday, but it annoys me to know Woody Paige thinks it will be despite or because of Josh McDaniels presence on the Patriots coaching staff. I really am not sure it matters.

Sunday, October 31, 2010

4 comments ...And From the Heavens Came a Tebow To Rescue Us All From the Sin of Losing

It's that time of the week again. It's time for a Denver columnist to suggest that the Broncos start Tim Tebow. I will apparently be writing about this continuously until it stops...and it must stop at some point. This time it is Mark Kiszla, and not Woody Paige (who seems to have learned that Orton should and will be the starter), who suggests this desperate move.

The title of this article is "McDaniels' Last Salvation--Tebow," which buys into the whole "Tebow is a Christian" theme where there seems to be an almost Christ-like adoration from those who write about him. I can't help but laugh at the use of the word "salvation" regarding Tebow becoming the starter. The use of semi-religious imagery when talking about Tebow is great in my book (by "great" I mean "slightly nauseating).

Kyle Orton is done as the Broncos' quarterback. He just doesn't know it yet. So what's the hang-up getting the Tim Tebow era started?

That small little detail that Tebow doesn't seem to be ready to be the starting quarterback of an NFL team yet. There is also the detail that Kyle Orton hasn't been the reason the Broncos have been losing games. The Broncos defense has given up 24, 14, 27, 20, 31, 24, and 59 points this year. They have won two games. I will let you guess which games they won based on the points they gave up.

(Spoiler alert: It's the two smallest numbers: 14 and 20)

As bad as the Broncos have been so far, the leader in their division is 4-2 and there doesn't seem to be an extraordinary strong team in the division. The division is still there for the taking. Sure, it will take some work, but it could be had. Orton is worth much more as a starter right now and Tebow will learn much more not being on the field right now as well.

Coach Josh McDaniels doesn't have the guts to tell his players their NFL season is dead.

NFL players aren't stupid, they would know if the season was over. So they know, they don't need a sports columnist telling them this. Putting Tebow in the game wouldn't do anything to make the players think the season is not over.

Good heavens, can Tebow save us from this mess?

He uses the word "heavens" when talking about Tebow. Every column pertaining to Tebow is like an allegory.

The humiliation of a 59-14 loss to Oakland will forever be stamped like an "L" on the forehead of Orton so long as he wears a Broncos uniform.

There's no bouncing back from this? Much like when the Cardinals got beat 47-7 by the Patriots in December 2008. Kurt Warner immediately went home and committed suicide...wait, no that's not right. The Cardinals recovered a few weeks later ended up going to, and almost winning the Super Bowl. So yes, there is no recovery from this loss if you want to be a drama queen about it.

It is not Kyle Orton's fault the defense gave up 59 points. He threw one interception. He could not have been able to keep pace with an offense that scores 59 points. Anyway, the Kyle Orton era is over because the Broncos defense sucks.

This defeat will leave a scar on true blue Broncomaniacs, and the rout was on from the instant Orton threw a pick-six that staked the Raiders to a two-touchdown lead before Denver could run its second offensive play from scrimmage.

Clearly, it is Orton's fault then. He gave up one of those pick-six's that results in the other team scoring 52 points for one interception. Notice the Broncos were already down 7 points when he threw this back-breaking interception...how did the other 45 points get scored? Is that Orton's fault too? Why do I get the feeling if Tebow was the QB then this article would be about how bad the defense was and how they let Tebow down by not supporting him?

His role is as a gimmick. That should not be the role of a first- round draft choice on a losing NFL team.

This statement leads to two conclusions:

1. The Broncos coaching staff has no clue how to evaluate quarterbacks by not knowing Tebow would play well while on the field.

2. Tim Tebow is not ready to be on the field as a starting quarterback.

Only Tebow can save McDaniels now.

Tebow can "save" McDaniels. He is EXACTLY like Jesus Christ, just much better looking and with bigger biceps.

But here's the tricky part: If Tebow can't play, then McDaniels is done in Denver.

Here's the really, really tricky part: What???

We won't know if Tebow can play for at least another season or two. How is this such a difficult concept to grasp? McDaniels may be done in Denver, but even if Tebow came out and looked good, if the defense isn't holding up its end of the deal then McDaniels still gets fired. It's like zero Denver-based sportswriters can understand this. Tebow was a first round pick, but he isn't ready to start right now. He may turn out to be a great quarterback, but it is going to take time to find out for sure. So it is borderline retarded (and I don't mean to insult any mentally handicapped people by comparing them to what Mark Kiszla is writing) to think if Tebow can't play THIS YEAR then he is a bust and McDaniels should be fired based on this.

McDaniels could have given the die-hards one reason to cheer by inserting Tebow at quarterback. McDaniels never made the move. Stubborn and stupid is no way to go through life.

Stupid and wrong is much more preferable to Kiszla.

"That's not really the time that I'd want (Tebow) to get work," said McDaniels, explaining why Orton played to the bitter end, at a time when the only dramatic thing Orton could have done was get injured during the final minutes of a blowout.

It sounds a little bit like Kiszla was hoping for Kyle Orton to get injured. If so, that's not cool at all.

What hope does McDaniels have to sell to franchise owner Pat Bowlen or all those people who bought No. 15 jerseys after Tebow was drafted?

It has not even been 7 months since Tebow was drafted. Give Tebow more time. Josh McDaniels is paid to win football games, not make the fan base happy by allowing the players the fans want to see in the game. If McDaniels panders to the fan base then he should just go ahead and fire himself. It doesn't matter how many jerseys with No. 15 on them were bought if Tebow isn't ready to be an NFL starting quarterback. That's the bottom line. Pander to the fan base and get fired. Make smart football decisions and you could still have a job.

I know what you are asking yourself? What does Peter King think about all of this? Peter was asked about whether the Broncos should switch QB's in his MMQB mailbag and he said:

If Orton is benched anytime soon, McDaniels should be fired. I believe his job is safe after the season unless he has a few more Sundays like the one he just had. Re the D, I think the losses of Elvis Dumervil and Robert Ayers have been debilitating.

This is coming from a Grade-A Tebow lover. Peter has been on record as saying he thinks Tebow appears to have a bright future in Denver. He also knows it wasn't Orton's fault the game ended up the way it did.

Although they have a flight scheduled to London, the Broncos aren't going anywhere this season.

Seriously, this was a sentence in this column. The Denver Post's editors have essentially given up by now, between editing crap like this and Woody Paige's columns.

Finishing 8-8 would be a major accomplishment. So why not let Tebow actually throw his first NFL pass or start his first league game?

Because 8-8 could win the division. I don't see the logic that because the Broncos are struggling they should put their second best quarterback in the game. Mark Kiszla is talking about sending messages to the team, what kind of message does that send to the defense? Does he believe they will try harder if Tebow is out there? Does he has some inspirational skills that will help the defense play better?

"Hey, I know you guys have been struggling defensively, but I am going to make your job a little bit harder. Don't bother thanking me, that look of disgust is thanks enough."

After a great showing in September, Orton has completed a pathetic 41 percent of his passes for an average of barely 200 yards per game in consecutive losses to the New York Jets and Raiders that have ripped the heart from Denver's will to win

This is shitty journalism at its best/worst. The Broncos offense had 5 turnovers in those two games. They had 8 fumbles in the game and lost 4 of them. The team around the quarterback position was bad as well in both games. Orton threw one interception and put up 20 points against the Jets. He could have played better in that game, but it is not just his fault the Broncos lost. The game against the Raiders is in no way his fault because the Raiders scored 59 points on the Broncos. That's not on Orton.

As soon as McDaniels gives a start to Tebow, the coach basically informs 37-year-old safety Brian Dawkins and 34-year-old nose tackle Jamal Williams the Broncos are playing for a future in which it's impossible to imagine how they fit in.

And this would be a good thing for the Broncos? So the solution to the problem is to insert Tebow as the starting quarterback so the offense can regress and the defense can become demoralized?

Go with Tebow as the starter, and Bailey might be glad Denver pulled that offer of a contract extension from the table, so the veteran cornerback can find a franchise closer to championship contention as a free agent.

We all know chasing away somewhat quality defensive players is the key to creating a successful team. Champ Bailey isn't stupid. He knows if this Broncos team is going anywhere or not. He doesn't need Tebow starting to tell him this. He is a free agent after this year, so he doesn't need a sign from the Broncos to find a franchise closer to winning a championship, he can do that on his own in a couple of months.

As soon as Denver starts Tebow at quarterback, the clock starts ticking on McDaniels' last chance to show he is competent at building and coaching a successful NFL franchise.

This logic may be correct, so why would McDaniels put Tebow out there if he isn't ready to be out there? This is a better argument to keep Tebow on the bench, yet somehow Kiszla sees it as a reason to start him.

Sooner rather than later, the lone way McDaniels can silence the booing of Broncomaniacs directed at him will be to send Tebow marching into the Denver huddle.

If Pat Bowlen bases his coaching decisions on who the fans want to see coaching the team then this franchise is destined for failure. What will happen is Tebow will get sent out to start a game, he will probably not be incredibly impressive and then the fans will hate McDaniels anyway because he is a quarterback coach who can't coach quarterbacks. I can already see the article getting written with this very sentence in it.

The Broncos are in a shit-load of trouble if they lose another game, but the latest loss was not the fault of Kyle Orton because he doesn't play defense. If Tebow is ready to start, then absolutely start him, but Orton has shown himself to be competent enough at this point and the Broncos probably should not be making changes this early in the season that indicates they have given up on the season. Everyone seems to believe Tebow is the answer to all that ails the Broncos. I actually want him to play 2-3 games just to show them perhaps they are wrong.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

5 comments Peter King Talks Some Tim Tebow

I didn't cover Peter's Tuesday mailbag last week so I felt like I have to cover it this week. It is all a part of the NFL Draft-oriented week I appear to be running here at BotB. After this week, no more draft talk I promise. There is just so much good NFL Draft-related material, I can't help myself. Today, Peter massages his Tebow-ner and talks about why if Tebow doesn't meet expectations set for him and save the entire world from its sins, he will at least be the greatest quarterback in the history of the NFL.

Ok, Peter never said that, but it is fun to make things like this up. By the way, I am refining my NFL Draft grades and plan on posting the first half tomorrow (yes, I said "first half," I got carried away a little bit). I know I am posting it late after draft, but I wanted to actually think about what I was going to say rather than just do a day-after grade and end up regretting everything I said two years down the road.

I've thought all along that Tim Tebow would need a redshirt year, but two things now tell me I might be wrong.

1. The lusty feeling in Peter's heart when he sees Tim Tebow in person.

2. Peter texted God and God texted back, "Def ready 2 start this yr. Will put good word in 4 him to McDaniels."

First, Denver trading the 40th, 70th and 114th picks in a power draft to pick Tebow is a powerful statement.

"I'm Josh fucking McDaniels and I can do whatever the hell I want to do because it is my team for the next 1-2 years until I get fired. If I want to trade a 1st round pick to Kansas City in order to draft the team mascot for Georgia, I will do it. Don't you see my hoodie with the sleeves cut off? That means I am smart and know how to dress like a homeless man."

What a powerful statement.

The 25th pick is worth 720 points on the chart every team in the league uses -- some more religiously than others. The 43rd pick is worth 470, the 70th worth 240, and the 114th worth 66. That totals 776. The Broncos paid 56 more points than were necessary by the chart -- equivalent to the 199th overall pick, a late fourth-rounder -- to get Tebow. Denver, obviously, wanted to make the deal badly enough to ratchet up the compensation.

So just for clarification, there isn't a chance in Hell (in the opinion of Peter King) the Broncos overpaid to draft Tebow, they just wanted him that badly. There is a difference. That difference can be seen in whether the person reporting this story is gullible enough to just accept what is being said by McDaniels. This person should be gullible enough to not ask questions about why a team that needs multiple draft picks to fill multiple holes caused by trading away the best players on that team is overpaying for a player in the draft. Here, Josh McDaniels is telling the story to Peter King...so that speaks for itself on the gullibility scale because Peter can be gullible at times.

The Broncos went over the recommended compensation for Tebow, there is nothing wrong with this. I get the feeling Peter doesn't entertain the thought this wasn't smart move for the Broncos.

"When I went to Gainesville Monday to work him out,'' McDaniels said, referring to his hush-hush trip to spend the day with Tebow, "we spent about seven hours together.

"We went to go see 'Valentine's Day' together, got a couple slices of pie at a pizzeria, walked around campus together pausing only to sit under a tree for a while and then he tearfully told me goodbye as I departed on a midnight train to Georgia to see Demaryius Thomas work out."

Now, understand that our offense is pretty complicated, and the terminology and the scheme is totally different from what he did at Florida.

The total terminology at Florida:

"Fake the hand-off and then run with the ball."
"Hand the ball off."
"Fake the hand-off and then throw the ball to one of the four receivers who are open."

He's so smart about football that he was able to begin to speak my language and talk apples to apples. He'd already translated what he knew of our scheme into my words. That's something that carried a lot of weight with me.''

I like to think McDaniels' pre-draft interview with Demaryius Thomas went this way:

(McDaniels) "So at this point after the snap, what do you do?"

(Thomas) "Block."

(McDaniels) "No, this is a passing play. What route do you run after the snap?"

(Thomas) "When I don't block, I run straight ahead and wait for the ball to be thrown to me."

(McDaniels) "No, no. You have two options based on what you and the quarterback read from the defense pre-snap. You are supposed to run a curl route if there is man coverage on you, but if they are running a zone, you and the quarterback hopefully recognize it pre-snap and run a drag over the middle."

(Thomas staring blankly) "So, I thought I was supposed to run straight ahead. I don't know what those other routes are. How far ahead do I run straight ahead in these other routes before I can expect the ball to be thrown to me?"

(McDaniels knowing he HAS to draft Thomas to show everyone how smart he is)

McDaniels also said: "The football traits he has is the stuff you die for.''

Come on! I am expected to not make a Jesus-Tebow joke about dying for something? I can't make this joke, I just can't.

That tells me McDaniels will find something this year for Tebow to do. I don't know what it is.

"Hey Tim, I am pretty thirsty. Can you run and get me a glass of water...and can you run to the store and get me some gum as well. Juicy Fruit, specifically."

I am just kidding, Tim Tebow may end up making a wonderful NFL quarterback. It is just too much fun to mock the fact the Broncos took a project quarterback in the 1st round and there is such an incredible amount of love for Tebow among the media and the world in general.

I think Demaryius Thomas isn't the receiver Dez Bryant is, but he's a guy the Broncos will sleep better at night having, and he'll step in for Brandon Marshall. Can he be Marshall? I doubt he'll be the impact player, but he'll have the chance.

It is nice that Peter doubts the wide receiver the Broncos selected in the 1st round will have an impact the receiver they just traded away had. I know Marshall was causing problems, but replacing Marshall with a guy who isn't as good is a downgrade at receiver...and that is not how a team gets better. I know this is simplistic thinking, but I thought to win more football games the Broncos would need to get better at each position?

McDaniels made it clear to me the best quarterback will start. He said Kyle Orton is the incumbent, and the starter, today. In camp, who knows? Maybe Brady Quinn lights it up, or maybe Tebow comes along faster than everybody thinks.

Maybe Tim Tebow will lecture the entire team on the dangers of pre-marital sex (God, I wish Travis Henry was still on the team. I really, really wish he was) or maybe Kyle Orton's neck beard will attack someone in training camp. Peter's point is that we don't know what will happen dammit, so quit speculating by writing all kinds of scenarios down. Just stop everyone! Quit speculating!

Ok, back to Peter speculating...

But the fact Tebow already has a head-start on knowing the offense, and was peeved he had to leave Denver over the weekend to go back home (NFL rules don't permit rookie to be at their team's facilities, other than for a rookie mini-camp, until their class graduates in the spring) is a sign he might come along quicker in the mental part of the game than many draftees would.

See this is the type of "Tebow-love" thing that gets him so much hatred from the world that doesn't like the massive amount of love he receives. Tebow knows basic things about the Denver offense and wants to stay and practice with the team (how many rookies DON'T want to do this?) and now he is smarter than all the other draftees...not draftee quarterbacks, but draftees overall. Tebow may come along quicker on the mental part of the game, but the fact he knows some of the teams plays in his head doesn't necessarily tell me he is ahead of where he should be mentally.

I wouldn't be surprised if McDaniels invented some sort of red zone or goal line package for Tebow.

He wouldn't design a package for Tebow like most coaches do, he is fucking INVENTING one that doesn't even exist in any other playbook in the entire world. I really hope McDaniels designs a jump-pass for Tebow on the goal line, those were always interesting to watch when he was at Florida.

Now, this would be interesting for team chemistry, because whoever wins the starting job (I assume Orton) will have to swallow hard to be OK with getting yanked a couple of times a game for Tebow.

Obviously Denver saw how much yanking Vick-McNabb in/out of the game could disrupt the flow of the offense in Philadelphia and immediately knew he had to do the same in Denver.

I wouldn't worry about Orton. Kyle Orton has no ego. This is a guy who got benched for Rex Grossman. After that, there is nowhere to go but up in terms of shots to his ego. Kyle Orton can handle being benched for Tim Tebow because being benched for a University of Florida quarterback isn't anything new to him.

There're going to be doubts about him. Great doubts -- and I understand that. Some people don't think he has the natural traits of a great quarterback.

I just think he is a quarterback working on his throwing motion coming out of a college offense that isn't well known for preparing the quarterback for the NFL. I don't doubt his work ethic or if Tebow can become a great quarterback, but I doubt if he was worth a 1st round pick. That's pretty much it, but doubting Tebow can do anything is becoming a Tebow-hater in the eyes of many.

Here's what I think: Do Jim Furyk and Tiger Woods swing the club the same way, hit irons the same way? No. But they both win tournaments. There're different ways to throw, different mechanics, and you can still get the job done.''

This is not a good comparison. Tebow's motion compared to Tom Brady's motion is like comparing Tiger Woods swing to Charles Barkley's swing. That's a more accurate comparison. Throw in the fact I hadn't seen Tebow go away from his primary receiver too often in college and hasn't taken too many snaps from behind center and I can't help but be skeptical of his ability to be a good NFL quarterback.

It's going to be fun to watch.

No, it's not. Hearing about Tebow all the time will continue to be unbearable.

I was intrigued by Tampa's draft, if only by the pairing of two defensive tackles (Gerald McCoy and Brian Price) and two wide receivers (Arrelious Benn and Mike Williams), all in the top 101 selections.

By the way, Tampa Bay is headed completely in the right direction. More on this in my NFL Draft grades, but they are headed for positive things.

Williams, obviously, jumps out as the 101st pick in the draft. He had academic troubles at Syracuse, broke curfew, was suspended by coach Doug Marrone and later quit the team. It's a classic risk-reward draft choice; many teams in the league didn't have Williams on their draft board.

Only a wide receiver desperate team would take him, really. Hence the Bucs got him. He quit the team at Syracuse. QUIT THE TEAM. Why draft him, no matter his talent? This was after he got suspended and broke curfew.

But Dominik said: "He's a starting receiver. I think he's going to start for us at some point this year. He's excited to play football, and we all know it's a risk. Quitting is obviously a big hurdle to get over. That's not good. But he's a good kid and a passionate football player

Passionate except for the fact he wasn't passionate enough to not break curfew, get suspended from playing football and quitting the team. Of course if Greg Paulus was my quarterback I would have quit too possibly.

Let's get to the Peter King mailbag now...

From Steve Curfman of Cary, N.C.: "Knowing now that Jimmy Clausen lasted until the 48th pick and would have been there at 37, do you think the Redskins are kicking themselves knowing they could have had an LT (Trent Williams) and QB (Clausen) for the next 10 years as well as their third- or fourth-rounder next year, or are they content with having an LT for the next 10 years and a Pro-Bowl caliber QB in Donovan McNabb for the next 2 or 3 years and without that 3rd/4th rounder next season?''

First off, this is all hindsight. There is no way the Redskins could have known they could get Clausen at #37 and still get a good left tackle in the draft and save the draft picks they instead traded for McNabb. No one expected this to actually happen.

That being said, I remember when the McNabb trade went down and Peter said this:

I like Shanahan and GM Bruce Allen knowing they probably couldn't get the college quarterback of their dreams, Sam Bradford, in trade with St. Louis -- and going out and getting a 2010-ready passer who will upgrade their team drastically at the most important position on the field.

I said n the post:

Obviously I don't know much inside information and the Redskins might, but I wouldn't trade a 2nd round pick and 3rd or 4th round pick for a 33 year old quarterback based on the assumption the Rams are picking Bradford. What if Bradford is still available at #4?

I am using hindsight now (I wasn't when I wrote that statement), but there was always the possibility a quarterback would fall in the draft. I thought a team like the Redskins, which had offensive line issues, may have been better off showing some patience and seeing how the draft shakes out. Maybe McNabb would have been traded at that point, that's the risk you take, but I am not a fan of trading draft picks when the team you coach has multiple holes that need to be filled.

PK: Very good question. I believe Mike Shanahan liked Clausen, but the only quarterback Shanahan truly liked in this draft was Sam Bradford; if he couldn't get Bradford, he felt why not get the tackle he liked for that scheme, and a quarterback he thought he could win with for the next four years.

That is a good answer then. If Shanahan didn't like Clausen, McCoy, Tebow or any of the other available quarterbacks, then he shouldn't worry about losing out in this Clausen/Williams possible scenario where the Redskins didn't trade for McNabb. Of course if Shanahan really liked Bradford he could have traded the #4 pick and the 2nd/3rd round pick he gave up for McNabb for the #1 pick. Maybe it wouldn't have worked or maybe the Rams wouldn't have gone for it, I am just brainstorming right now.

I guess what I am saying is that as much as Donovan McNabb improves the Redskins, I still see him as a short-term fix, while I think the Redskins could have acquired a guy with some of the picks they traded away who is a long-term fix. If Shanahan really liked Bradford, he had the ammunition to trade up and get him.

From Tonyof Wilmington, Del.: "Mr. King, do you find it at all interesting that so many question the Tim Tebow pick when Vince Young was considered to be first-round worthy when he was picked? Both had some mechanics issues, and both relied a lot on their athleticism as opposed to being pure passing QB's.

I don't see the comparison between these two quarterbacks. Contrary to popular belief, Tebow isn't half the athlete Vince Young is, nor did Vince Young's throwing motion require as much work as Tebow's throwing motion did. Young's throwing style looked ugly, but the motion was fairly correct compared to Tebow's throwing motion. The biggest misconception I have heard about Tebow is that he is a great athlete, when he isn't. He's obviously a great athlete compared to the rest of the world, but compared to Vince Young and other "running" QB's, I don't think he possesses that type of running ability or athleticism. He is a great athlete, but there is no comparison to his athleticism and a guy like Vince Young. When he ran at Florida, he often ran over defenders, which won't work as well in the NFL.

The one thing Tebow has going for him is that he is a hard-working, he has the build to be an NFL quarterback, and he already has a huge fan base. He can make it in the NFL, but just don't compare him to players he is not similar to.

Most notably Tebow was more of a winner and appears to have far better intangibles and leadership ability. Why are so many willing to dismiss Tebow, particularly when Tebow appears to be strong in the areas where Young has struggled, i.e. the mental part of the game?''

Tim Tebow played four years of college football, while Vince Young only played three years. That's a difference in the two players. Young was an athlete at quarterback in college and the NFL and I don't know if Tebow is an athlete at quarterback or not.

PK: It's an interesting point. I think the biggest thing they have in common is bad classic NFL quarterback mechanics. Young is still working on that aspect, as well as his accuracy. Tebow has a long way to go with his mechanics, but he'll have a good teacher in Josh McDaniels.

Thanks for the Joe Morgan-esque answer Peter. We now have as much information after you have answered the question as we had before you answered the question.

From Peter of Lincoln Park, N.J.: "The Thursday draft stinks. The justification Roger Goodell is touting is the ratings. But I would assume the ratings are higher for the same reason the Thursday slot stinks -- because people aren't watching the draft together. Our group used to have a draft party every year, but couldn't do it this year. What are your thoughts?''

The NFL doesn't care if people get to watch the draft together or not. They know ratings were up 30% and that is all they care about. Case closed.

From Steve of Milton, Ontario: "Peter, it seems the clock is ticking rapidly on Jamarcus Russell's days as a Raider. If so, where could you see him going? One team stands out to me as a great spot for him to salvage his career: Washington. Donovan McNabb can mentor him, and allows Russell a couple of years to develop; if any coach can make Russell a competent NFL QB, it's Mike Shanahan;

I would love to see McNabb try to mentor JaMarcus Russell. I love the idea of giving Russell a few years to develop. The only thing Russell would develop after being on the bench for a few years is a massive gut and possibly some splinters in his ass. Nothing says, "long-term" plan like taking a failed #1 pick who is overweight and then giving him a few years to learn under a quarterback who has been accused of being out of shape a few times himself.

He made his own bed with his lack of effort and now he'll have to lie in it. Washington is as good a choice as any,

We all know one team is going to take Russell, but which team will it be? It has to be a team with a head coach whose ego tells him he can fix Russell when others could not, it has to be a team with an owner who would let a coach sign a #1 pick that has been a bust, and it has to be a team that apparently few other options for the backup quarterback.

though I could see a place like Philadelphia (even after drafting Mike Kafka) because scouting adviser Phil Savage would give him a strong recommendation.

I hate piling on JaMarcus Russell, I really do. What kind of owner or General Manager would listen to a recommendation from a scouting advisor about Russell? Every other NFL team has information on Russell and are aware of his strengths/weaknesses. Some team is going to sign him after the Raiders let him go, but I think the only recommendation that would work to convince a team's General Manager to sign him would be, "The Raiders know what they are doing. We are not the Raiders so he has to be given a shot to play for a team that isn't dysfunctional." That's almost the only recommendation for Russell I could listen to as an owner or General Manager.

Whew, NFL draft week is almost over and then I will go back to bad journalism that encompasses all sports.