Showing posts with label my recommendations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label my recommendations. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

7 comments MMQB Review: Peter Is Humble About the Award He Received, The Same Award I Wouldn't Know He Had Received If He Didn't Bring It Up

Peter King relayed second hand the story of one woman's fight with her defecating service dog on a plane last week in MMQB. Peter also relayed the speculation that this woman didn't really need her service dog on the flight, which was really kind of him. He also got a few more shots at Josh Freeman in, as well as bemoaned Greg Schiano getting fired too soon. This week Peter talks about the focus on the ethnical culture (wait, nevermind...that's "ethical culture") in the Bears locker room by signing Jimmy Clausen (okay, kidding about that too...the Bears really signed Clausen though), Peter shows a picture of Dr. Z who actually looks pretty good, recommends Father's Day books, reveals the MMQB replacement writers for the month of July, and there is no travel note this week. Maybe after last week's bashing of a lady who may or may not have a condition requiring her to have a service dog on a plane has led Peter to get rid of the travel note. More than likely he just didn't have anything to complain about this week in regard to traveling, though one could hold out hope he has gotten rid of the travel note.

Notes from the last pre-vacation MMQB—including Marc Trestman the people person, Jay Cutler the leader, and the first annual “Paul ‘Dr. Z’ Awards” by the Pro Football Writers of America—on the eve of tonight’s 55th annual National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Awards ceremony in this real-life Mayberry place.

I don't know why the National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Awards Hall of Fame is in Salisbury, North Carolina. I know of no good reason for this other than someone lost a bet and the result is the NSSA awards ceremony and Hall of Fame are in Salisbury. More importantly, it isn't "real-life" Mayberry. Mount Airy, North Carolina is actually real-life Mayberry...at least they claim to be. Salisbury is nothing like the fictional city of Mayberry, though I'm sure every city below northern Virginia is just another small, dumb hick town to Peter King.

Good news, Bears

GET IT?

But I give special points to Chicago Bears coach Marc Trestman and quarterback Jay Cutler for their efforts. And I’m learning more and more about how wrong we were that Trestman was some Xs-and-Os monk who couldn’t deal with players on a human scale.

(Looks around the room in confusion) Who said that Marc Trestman was "some X's-and-O's monk who couldn't deal with players on a human scale"? He was a pretty good coach in the CFL. I guess Peter has taken to Bill Simmons' use of the word "we" to describe when Peter's own personal thoughts were wrong, but he can't accept that he personally was wrong, so he says "we" were wrong, because obviously Peter's own personal thoughts reflect the thoughts of the sports loving population as a whole. Peter is OUR football voice and our thoughts are his thoughts.

Another example: Trestman and Cutler recently flew to New York to meet with the league’s new values-meister, Dov Seidman, to exchange ideas about fostering a more ethical culture in the locker room. I’ve heard of players and coaches working on football in the off-season, and maybe even on better forms of leadership. But for a coach and his top lieutenant in the locker room—who has never been considered a classic locker-room leader—to get on a plane and spend a day working on new techniques and dialog … that goes beyond the call of duty.

It also makes sense. I don't necessarily believe in the "high-fiving and hanging out with each other" stuff to the extent Bill Simmons believes in it, but I do think a team that likes each other can perform at a higher level because of their increased level of engagement in wanting to succeed for each other.

“In our locker room, everyone should feel safe. For some of the guys in Chicago, it was kind of new to them. There’d be no hazing. Lovie Smith had a great group of players—a great group—and he did a great job with them. There were some subtle things I wanted to add.

Things like stop showing pictures from the Smoking Jay Cutler tumblr to Jay Cutler and making jokes about how many men have slept with his wife by pretending they were filming a reality show and offering her cocaine? It's unbecoming and very rude.

Seidman, the CEO of the LRN Company, a company that works with businesses to stress principled performance, addressed club and league officials at the annual meeting in March, and has remained an adviser to the league...“You don’t just flip a switch on something like this,” Seidman said. “It’s about a journey. It’s about progress. I think teams are figuring out there’s a new way to win, and that includes caring for the player as a person, a father and a husband.

It all sounds so very sweet and kind. I'm sure this philosophy would fit in perfectly with the locker room of a sport where the purpose is to collide violently with the opposing player.

Then Peter shows a picture of Dr. Z, who looks pretty good.

All my snark about how Peter used the money from his readers to fund an expensive, experimental treatment for Dr. Z and then there was almost no follow up in MMQB aside, it's good to see him at least look healthy.

If you notice, Peter King the diehard Boston Red Sox fan, has a Washington Nationals shirt on. This isn't the first time I've seen a picture of Peter wearing apparel of a team he doesn't recognize as his favorite sports team. It's just odd to me. Maybe I'm weird, but if I'm a big fan of a certain athletic team I'm not going to go around sporting shirts with the logo from a competing athletic team in that same sport.

Rodgers came to lunch and brought with him an Emmy—for Paul. The gold statuette sat on the table in front of Paul throughout the meal. He beamed. Rodgers choked up a couple of times talking about Zim and the experience of doing this wonderful story. “My favorite moment,” said Rodgers at one point, “was listening to an old interview of Paul with him in the room, and thinking how emotional it would probably make him, and I look at him, and he’s rolling his eyes as if to say, ‘Blah, blah, blah. Just shut up, will you?’ ”

That picture is Dr. Z with his Emmy, with Peter looking on wondering where he can get a Tampa Bay Rays knit shirt to wear with his Toronto Blue Jays Starter jacket, Detroit Tigers socks and Arizona Diamondbacks sandals.

It’s long past time that career assistants, who don’t make the Hall of Fame and most often work deep in the shadows of their head coaches, are memorialized for what they do. PFWA leaders Ira Miller and Dan Pompei pushed to honor Paul Zimmerman in conjunction with the award, seeing that Zim for so long chronicled these men in the shadows and was constantly drawing attention to the previously invisible work of so many of them. So the PFWA decided to christen the award “The Paul ‘Dr. Z’ Zimmerman Award” for lifetime achievement for NFL assistant coaches.

I can't wait for 10 years from now when Peter pushes the PFWA to honor quarterbacks named Brett Favre who have contributed to the game of football and he will call it "The Brett Favre Award" which will go to Brett Favre and then never be handed out again.

The inaugural class of four winners:

Howard Mudd, who worked for 39 years as an NFL offensive line coach with eight teams.

The late Fritz Shurmur, a veteran of 24 years as an NFL coach, 20 of them as a defensive coordinator.

Ernie Zampese, a 24-year NFL assistant and one of the architects of the modern passing game.

The late Jim Johnson, a master of the disguised blitz, a 23-year assistant and defensive coordinator.

When is Mike Shula going to finally be honored for his dedication to the short passing game and obvious play-calling? It's past time he gets his due. His offenses don't stay in the lower half of the NFL in terms of total offense without all the hard work he puts in.

Mudd said. He’s best known for his 12 years with the Colts—particularly for his patch job in 2008, when Indy had Manning coming back from tricky summer knee surgery and a dangerous infection, and center Jeff Saturday was hurt, and Mudd had to get rookie Jamey Richard ready to play one of the most complicated center positions in football, with all the changes Manning makes at the line. The Colts won 12 games.

I'm not trying to take anything away from Howard Mudd, but this story followed by "The Colts won 12 games" seems to indicate that Peyton Manning wasn't the quarterback for the Colts and Mudd's work with Richard is why the Colts won 12 games. I understand Mudd just can't run any old guy at the center position out there and have success, but the fact the Colts won 12 games has a lot to do with Peyton Manning and his ability to avoid sacks.

Ask Barry Sanders about Fritz Shurmur: In a 1994 playoff game against Shurmur’s Packers, Sanders was held to -1 yard on 13 carries.

Oh sure, I'll go ask Barry Sanders about Fritz Shurmur. (goes through his phone looking for Barry Sanders phone number) It turns out I don't have Barry Sanders' phone number because I don't fucking know Barry Sanders nor would he have any reason to give me his phone number. But yeah, I'll go ask him about Fritz Shurmur should I run into him while he's walking around my hometown.

I greatly dislike it when sportswriters say/write "Go ask Famous Person X" about something, as if his/her readers can really ask that person the question they want to ask.

Zampese has the distinction of running for the winning touchdown as a USC tailback against Notre Dame in 1956 (bet you didn’t know that)

If only I were as smart as Peter King and knew information such as this little morsel of a factoid that I really don't care about (bet you didn't know that).

My annual look at books I’d recommend for dad/brother/uncle/grandfather/male friend/male whoever, with Fathers Day just six days away, is a bit abbreviated this year.

It's a bit abbreviated in that it takes up an entire half page of MMQB. 10% of the page space is dedicated to the Father's Day books with Peter recommending five books. I would hate to see what it would look like if it wasn't abbreviated at all.

Sycamore Row, by John Grisham (Doubleday). Fiction.

I never get tired of John Grisham. I believe this is the 28th Grisham book I have read, because it is the 28th book he has published (not including his teen-book series).

Peter has read Grisham's teen-book series five times now. The way Grisham writes is just so precocious. He's like a child in how he writes books and has so much fun putting words to paper.

In “Sycamore Row,’’ the richest man in his Mississippi county, the same setting for Grisham’s first book, hangs himself because he doesn’t want to suffer through terminal cancer. He leaves a will that shocks his family and the entire county, and dredges up one of the worst hanging stories there ever was, and leads to a harrowing cleansing, and if I tell you much more, I’ll be spoiling a typically spellbinding Grisham tale.

If Peter told any more then there would be no reason for anyone to read the book because he's already spoiled the ending of the book.

Good writers tie them together so you look forward to the tying-up of loose ends on one story as you’re getting pulled into the second and the third and the fourth. I’m not a daily reader or what anyone would call an avid reader. But of the authors I read, Coben is the best at making six or eight tributaries flow into one body of water sensibly.

Ah yes, it is Peter's typical "I know nothing about this subject but here is my opinion that I expect you to take seriously as if I did know a lot about the subject." Usually he makes these statements in regard to the NBA, but he's expanded to making statements like this in regard to books.

I’ll be taking two weeks vacation starting tomorrow, then returning to work for one week, for some unique coverage of Canadian football during the week of June 24.

Watch out Canada! Peter King is coming for you! Your Starbucks aren't safe and he's going to comment about just how stupid you Canadians act in public, as well as search for the Canadian version of Josh Freeman, so he can take his anger out on some innocent quarterback who has committed the sin of making one of Peter's friends lose his job.

I'm assuming Peter has friends in Canada of course.

We’re going to cover the opening week of the Canadian Football League season, assuming the players and owners have their labor (or should I say, “labour”)

Oh, the insufferability.

Assuming the league is playing in week one, we’ll be covering it at The MMQB. When that coverage ends on July 1, I’ll be away until July 17.

I will be writing Monday Morning Quarterback, live from Regina, Saskatchewan, on Monday, June 30. The Saskatchewan Roughriders, defending Grey Cup champions, open their season on Sunday, June 29 (assuming they’re not on strike), and I’ll be there. Unless I screw it up, my MMQB on Monday the 30 ought to be a CFL spectacular. I’m looking forward to my time in Canada.

Canada looks forward to deporting you after you have been warned multiple times about leering at their citizens while riding on public transportation, criticizing local coffee shops for having too long of lines or weak coffee and transcribing entire conversations strangers are having on the street.

As is our usual custom, we’ll have replacement “Monday Morning Quarterback” columnists for four of the next five weeks. San Francisco tight end Vernon Davis will write one, and Chicago coach Marc Trestman will write another to kick off our Canada Week festivities; 

What a shock! A person that Peter compliments in this very MMQB is going to end up writing a MMQB this summer. Who would have thought Peter would compliment a person and then have that person write a MMQB? It's like when Peter named Coby Fleener one of his favorite interviews and it just so happened Fleener wrote a MMQB last year or when Nnamdi Asomugha wrote a MMQB several years ago and then Peter acted like his free agency was the biggest deal since Reggie White became a free agent (which is something Peter actually said). Nothing like friends helping friends to increase interest on the free agent market.

Oakland first-round pick, Khalil Mack, is slated to write another one of the MMQBs, with Rich Eisen of NFL Network rounding out the fearsome foursome.

Hopefully Eisen can bring along his NFL Network buddy to take shots at people who are in wheelchairs or make a few comments about how Stevie Wonder is supposedly blind, but he plays keyboards pretty well for a guy who "can't see."

I am privileged, and humbled, to accept the National Sportswriter of the Year award tonight here in Salisbury, home of the National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Hall of Fame.

So maybe next the Marriott doesn't have fresh coffee at 6am they will change their stance once they are reminded a Hall of Fame member wants that fresh coffee. It's not that Peter is important now, it's that he now has proof of his importance the next time a Starwood Preferred Member tries to jump in front of him for the elevator.

Rick Reilly and Marv Albert will be inducted into the Hall of Fame tonight,

As I've said before, sometimes I feel the best way to get recognized for being a good sportswriter is to be sure to have friends, work at a large national publication and don't die. At some point, you will probably receive an award for being a good sportswriter. There's no reason Rick Reilly should be receiving any type of award, but yet, he is in the Sportswriter Hall of Fame. I would consider him to be more of a compiler than one of the best sportswriters of all-time. I hope someone shows up and asks him to pee in a cup to prove he didn't use PEDs.

Then Peter thanks everyone who helped him get there and those who helped THE MMQB win the best blog in the Time Inc empire. So even though I can't be there to hear him get his award I already have read Peter's acceptance speech.

I still can't believe the Sportswriter Hall of Fame is in Salisbury, North Carolina. Just a random place for it to be. 

“The time I spent with him, I don’t think I would have been able to be at this point so quickly, if he hadn’t been such a great mentor with me and help me along.’’
—San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who signed a six-year contract worth up to $126 million last week, crediting former 49ers quarterback Alex Smith with a good mentoring job in Kaepernick’s first two years with the team.

Kaepernick appreciates you getting that concussion, Alex Smith! What a great team player you are to get a concussion and then allow Kaepernick to take your spot as the starting quarterback for the 49ers. He's so grateful.



Tremendous is from Kansas.

And Ken Tremendous is a fan of the Red Sox and (I believe) the other teams around the Boston area, so it's a little interesting he likes it when a team from Los Angeles and New York lose because it's probably how many people feel about his favorite teams.

Ten Things I Think I Think

1. I think I’d love to hear what an NFL locker room, or a big-league locker room in baseball or basketball or hockey, would say to a coach who said this publicly: “We cannot win our league this year, because we are not at that level yet.” U.S. soccer coach Jurgen Klinsmann said to Sam Borden of the New York Times: “We cannot win this World Cup, because we are not at that level yet.” In the last few days, since I derided Klinsmann for saying we cannot win an athletic competition that we, as one of 32 World Cup teams, begin to compete for starting next Monday, I’ve heard all of the theories about why he said it. 

Peter is like Michael Wilbon and wants Klinsman to get out of America. Show us your green card Klinsman!

My point is simple: It’s absurd for a group of players, who have been practicing and drilling and (I’m sure) watching all kinds of video on first-round foes Ghana, Portugal and Germany, to hear from the man leading them into the World Cup that they have no chance to win. I’d love to hear what Herb Brooks would have thought of that form of “motivation.”

Yeah me, too. What would a hockey coach have to say about a World Cup soccer coach motivating his team in the way he sees fit? He would probably say, "If that's how he wants to coach his team" and then go back to staring at his gold medal.

The U.S. opens World Cup play a week from today against Ghana. I’ll be watching, even though we don’t have a chance.

That's not what Klinsman said in the quote. He said they "cannnot win our league this year, because we are not at that level yet." The key word is "yet" in that sentence. Who is to say he won't feel the US team won't be at that level by the time play starts?

And who knows Klinsman's motivation for saying this? Klinsman wouldn't be the first coach to publicly say his team will probably lose while privately telling his team they are going to win. I feel like some of the criticism of Klinsman comes from the fact there are certain people (ahem, Peter?) who view him as a non-American coaching the American World Cup soccer team. That's just my opinion of course. There are quite a few head coaches in various sports who have publicly stated their team can't win (or will struggle to win) and then said something completely different in private to his team. Maybe Klinsman is just trying to manage the expectations of the general public who are casual soccer fans at best and expect the United States to be good at everything, no matter what.

2. I think Bruce Arians has no prejudice against playing rookies, and he certainly wants to improve his deep receiver speed from 2013, and he has been more impressed with third-round wideout John Brown of Pittsburg (Kans.) State with his 4.34-in-the-40 speed and his quick pickup of the Arizona offense … all of which leads me to believe if you’re drafting your fantasy football team in June, taking a late-round risk on Brown would be a smart idea on a deep roster. The Cardinals, so far, love him.

It's June. The Cardinals haven't played another team nor have they really gotten ready for the upcoming season. Probably a little too early to suggest drafting a rookie wide receiver based on how much the team likes him. Does Peter know how many receivers look great in June and disappear once the time comes for real training camp to start? The answer is 35. 35 receivers disappear every year after being loved in June.

7. I think the funniest headline of last week was one about Andrew Luck not being concerned about Colin Kaepernick’s new contract. People: Andrew Luck is not concerned about much of anything that is outside his Colts universe, and he certainly isn’t concerned with what anyone else’s contract is.

Well, thanks for clearing that up for us all Peter. I was concerned that Andrew Luck was concerned about making enough money in his next contract. Thank God that Luck isn't concerned and is only worried about things that are within his Colts universe. Though I am sure this will change once Luck's agent presents comparable contracts paid to NFL quarterbacks to the Colts when the time to discuss a contract extension does come.

He knows when it’s time to sign a contract, he’ll get what the market rate is for a player playing his position at whatever level he’s playing at the time. For him to worry about something like that would be incredibly anti-Luck.

Thank you for clearing up WWALD. It's very important that Peter clear up the headline that stated Luck wasn't concerned about Kaepernick's new contract by pointing out that Luck isn't worried about Kaepernick's contract. The misunderstanding that wasn't present is now completely cleared up. I wonder if Peter would take the time to point out Russell Wilson and other quarterbacks up for a new contract in the next year or two aren't worried about Kaepernick's contract or is it only Andrew Luck who gets this treatment?

8. I think Monica Seles would be one heck of a first lady of Buffalo football.

I think Peter doesn't know enough about Monica Seles to make this claim.

10. I think these are my non-football thoughts of the week:

a. That Belmont was really, really fun to watch.

As long as you are in to a three hour lead up to a moment that lasts barely two minutes (no jokes, please) and are in the mood to watch an animal get beaten with a whip in order to get him to move faster. Then yeah, I guess it was fun.

h. Coffeenerdness: I give up. I can’t drink any drip coffee but Italian Roast. I am officially the snobbiest coffee snob of all time.

Because a person who goes to Starbucks every single day should accurately be described as a coffee snob and all. Starbucks is the place a person goes to get a cup of coffee they know will be consistent, while I think a coffee snob would choose to go somewhere a little less commercial. Perhaps Peter is confusing believing he is a coffee critic with being a coffee snob. I wouldn't consider him to be a coffee snob based on how often he goes to Starbucks. Maybe it's me.

i. Beernerdness: Always happens this way—it’s hot out, it’s near summertime, and I move from heavier to lighter in beer selection.

It probably happens that way because brewers tend to make more lighter seasonal beers during the summer season than they make heavier beers during the summer season.

l. Think of this: Cranston plays LBJ at 8 p.m. Friday, at 2 and 8 p.m. Saturday, and at 2 p.m. Sunday. That’s four times in the span of 45 hours. Just watch Cranston’s exertion level and tell me that’s not an incredible task—particularly for his vocal chords.

You know what? I'll call Barry Sanders and we will go watch Bryan Cranston's exertion level together.

The Adieu Haiku

Why can't it be "Adieu to the Haiku"?

Kaepernick got paid.
Sort of—but it’s a good pact.
Play well, get rich. Good.


Anytime a player gets paid in the double-digit millions I don't think it's fair to say he "sort of" got paid. Not to over-analyze Peter's haiku but can a person "sort of" get paid and then be described as "getting rich"? I guess Kaepernick didn't really get paid but is now rich. I wonder how Peter would feel about Andrew Luck getting a deal where he doesn't have to play well, but gets rich? I imagine he wouldn't have an issue with it.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

15 comments MMQB Review: Peter is Now Writing Down the Phone Conversation a Stranger Has in an Airport

Peter King imagined the Raiders team with Colin Kaepernick as their quarterback last week, mourned the Raiders firing their PR guy, and encouraged fellow NFL writers to not focus on the unimportant things during the offseason. Then Peter proceeded to write about his visit to Carmen Policy's vineyard. This week Peter writes from Salisbury, NC (I wondered why all hotels in the area were touting their "fresh tasting coffee" this past weekend), informing us about an award he isn't worthy of receiving (except he just told us he was getting the award, so he sort of had to remind us he was getting the award for us to know he isn't worthy), and says Robert Griffin is a lock to play in Week 1. This pretty much means Kirk Cousins is the Redskins Week 1 starter, right? Oh, and Peter talks about how "we" use our phones too much nowadays. This coming from a guy who just a couple of months ago wouldn't get off his phone to give a cab driver accurate directions to an airport.

A few NFL points after a few days on the road:

More like nuggets of wisdom from the road. For example, what's up with all of those cars on the road during the weekend? Peter thought he was the only one in the world who had to travel this past weekend. Did you know if douse a rental car in gasoline, set it on fire, drive it off a cliff and then drive what is left of the car back to Hertz they expect you to pay for gas if you didn't fill the car up with gas before you brought it back?

Griffin had major knee surgery 21 weeks ago. Washington's opener is 13 weeks from tonight. After watching him run sprints around the practice field Thursday, I agree with what Griffin said post-practice: "Without a doubt'' he thinks he'll be practicing with the team when it begins training camp in Richmond in late July ... and, of course, that he'll be ready to go Sept. 9 against the Eagles.

Remember a couple of weeks ago when Peter said that all the news we get from an NFL team's training camp is positive and all the news can't be this positive? Peter is reporting WITHOUT A DOUBT Robert Griffin will be ready to play the Redskins opening game. So once again, the rules Peter himself sets don't pertain to Peter.

Here's what Griffin did Thursday: He sprinted without a limp the 53-yard width of the end zone. Then, at nearly full speed, he planted his twice-surgically repaired right knee and pivoted left, up the sideline of the practice field.

But did he do jumping jacks? We all know that's the real test on whether an NFL player is ready to play at full speed or not.

Tyrann Mathieu has impressed the Cardinals at safety. In OTA practices, players don't wear pads, and they're supposed to stay on their feet with minimal contact. When I watched the other day, Mathieu, working with the first unit for part of the practice, made a diving pass break-up of a Palmer throw and was buzzing around plays all through the workout. 

I'm not sure given Mathieu's drug issues in the past it is smart to characterize him as "buzzing" around plays all through the workout. I'm also not sure the big question regarding Mathieu is his ability to make plays on the field when there is minimal contact allowed. My question for him at safety is whether he is going to be able to stay disciplined enough and tackle well enough to start at the safety position. At LSU, Mathieu sort of free-lanced around the field at times and was given liberty to try and make plays. He has to be more disciplined at safety in the NFL or he will find himself out of position at times.

He's clearly at home on the practice field, pointing out coverages pre-snap and changing direction smoothly. "He reminds of Troy Polamalu with his closing speed,'' said Palmer. "He might not be the fastest guy out there, but he can change directions and get to the ball really fast, like Troy.''

And continuing with this comparison, Mathieu's biggest issue is going to be his instincts and how they can get him out of position at times on the field. Polamalu has had some issues with his free-lancing and Mathieu doesn't have nearly the experience at the safety position Polamalu had coming into the NFL.

Peter just hates it when reports from a team's training camp are all sunshine and roses. Now he's using quotes that compare Tyrann Mathieu to Troy Polamalu.

So far so good for the 69th pick in the draft, but June, obviously, isn't the time to make any judgments on rookies.

Well, obviously. When it comes to running around the field making minimal contact though, Mathieu looks great!

Think there's an SI cover jinx? What about a Bears draft pick jinx? The news that the Bears will trade 2011 first-round tackle Gabe Carimi to Tampa Bay for a sixth-round pick is just another brick in the wall of Chicago's recent disastrous high-draft experience on the offensive line. Not including this year's top pick (Kyle Long), and accounting for the fact that the Jay Cutler trade took away the first-rounders in 2009 and 2010 that may have been used on linemen,

How dare the Bears use first round picks to acquire Jay Cutler when they very easily could have used those picks to draft an offensive lineman that ends up not working out for them.

That's a six-pack of failure right there. Consider that the Bears' only first-round picks over a four-draft span (2008-'11) were Williams and Carimi, the Bears had to move them from tackle to guard to try to salvage their careers, then gave up on both. That's tough to recover from. And it's one reason there will be immense pressure on Kyle Long to be good, quickly.

One of the other reasons being that Kyle Long is a first round pick. There tends to be pressure on first round picks to be good, quickly anyway.

Remember the song "Why Can't We Be Friends?" It's by a group named War.

No, I don't remember War singing that song. I do remember Smashmouth singing "Why Can't We Be Friends?" and I always thought it was a silly question since the reason we can't be friends is because you have a shitty band that sings stupid songs about walking on the sun and being an all-star. No one likes you, that's why we can't be friends.

Finally, a note from inside the White House. "Where are your dreads?'' Barack Obama asked Torrey Smith at the White House the other day when the Ravens went to be recognized by the president. Smith, in fact, has cut his hair, and the leader of the free world is such a fan that he noticed.

This is very impressive, especially since Obama's main purpose as President is to recognize athletes no matter their current hairstyle.

What a happy birthday it is for me today (56, for those counting at home):

Humblebrag time everyone! This is the part where Peter shares information with us in an effort to appear modest, but it is clear he is just humblebragging.

It's Peter's birthday today and if there is anyone who knows Peter's birthday and is counting at home, then shame on you. If you aren't related to him, that's why we can't be friends. Nice way for Peter to slip in that it's his birthday. Real covert-like.

Oh, and you know that award Peter received from The National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association? You don't? Well let Peter ever-so-modestly fill you in on it in an effort to pretend he is being humble when he is simply reminding us he gets awards and is a big deal. It's always interesting who the sportswriting profession considers to be the best in the field. Rick Reilly has won several national sportswriting awards. It's a lot like the Oscars, Grammys, and Emmy's. It appears no one asks the general public who they feel is the best at a certain profession in a given year. Who is the general public to know excellence when they see it though? We are just a bunch of mouth droolers who wouldn't know great sportswriting if it used a dental analogy in a 500 word article on why golf is such a great sport.

The National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association is handing me the Sportswriter of the Year Award tonight. As you all know, I am not worthy,

Agreed that you aren't worthy, but yet you bring up this award to us when many of us would have no idea that you received this award unless it got mentioned in MMQB.

So the only reason Peter brought this award up was to tell us he doesn't think he is worthy of receiving the award. Sounds like a humblebrag to me.

but in the words of the great Bob Ryan: If they're going to give me such a nice award and say such nice things about me, who am I to turn it down? Who doesn't like being told how great they are?

Someone with some sense of modesty? A person who isn't impressed with their own achievements? Someone who doesn't specifically bring up that he won an award so he can say how unworthy he is of that award? Someone who is not you? A person who actually doesn't believe the great things that others say about him?

You just wrote my speech for tonight, Bob. Thanks. Looking forward to being with lots of good people from around the country. And thanks to NSSA guru Dave Goren for running such a great event.

You don't have to suck up to the NSSA anymore. You have won the award already. 

Do not get your father a tie this week. Get him a book.

Now for the Father's Day book section. I've been doing this for a few years, in part because we need to find more excuses to read in our lives, and in part because your father, brother, uncle and grandfather all told me last week they were dying for a good book for Father's Day.

Apparently Peter can talk to the dead. My grandfathers and father are dead and I don't have a brother. Thanks for reminding me though, Peter. Now my feelings are hurt.

Last year in this list I gave you The Art of Fielding, and before that Unbroken ... two of my favorite books ever. I don't have one I love as much this year, but I have several I like very much. I wouldn't put one on here that I wouldn't recommend to a good friend.

I have no friends either, so thanks for reminding me that I have no one to recommend these books to.

Sutton, by J.R. Moehringer (Hyperion).

Mike O'Hara told me to read this book, and when Mike tells me to do something, I just do it.

Dear Mike, I have some things I need Peter to do. Please contact me. 

The Racketeer, by John Grisham (Doubleday).

Oh, a John Grisham book. I didn't know it was 1996 again.

Usually, he's preaching about some form of the law, with the underpaid lawyer working to right one of The Man's serious wrongs. In this one, a disbarred and jailed lawyer is the protagonist, and the machinations that lead him to a new life and to run circles around the FBI to acquire that new life are told tightly. It's a page-turner.

So Grisham is basically combining parts of "The Client" and "The Firm." Okay, I'm done hating on John Grisham. I used to enjoy his books, then I realized in the late 1990's his books really weren't that good anymore, so I stopped reading them.

The National Forgotten League: Entertaining Stories and Observations from Pro Football's First Fifty Years, by Dan Daly (University of Nebraska Press).

We don't appreciate pro football history. We never have.

Yes, "we" don't Peter Bill King Simmons. "We" are just too infatuated with how the NFL is today and "we" don't care about the NFL's history.

You love pro football. You're still reading about it in June; you must love it.

No Peter, we are here to read about your personal thoughts on gun control, which award you are receiving this week and just how annoying it is to deal with the general public. Who reads MMQB to hear about football? No one does. We only care to read about Peter King's personal thoughts and which member of the general public annoyed him over the past week.

There's a hundred more where that one came from. You know how Daly finds such stories? He's curious.

He's curious, like a cat. That's why his friends call him "Whiskers."

Francona: The Red Sox Years, by Terry Francona and Dan Shaughnessy (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).

EVERYONE SHOULD READ ABOUT THE GENIUS OF TITO FRANCONA AND HOW HE BROKEN THE BAMBINO'S CURSE! OUR MANAGER'S BOOKS ARE BETTER THAN YOUR MANAGER'S BOOKS!

For instance: I always felt Francona coddled the immature and disruptive (and, as this books shows, likely disturbed) Manny Ramirez, for instance. But Shaughnessy gives a clear picture of what happened with Ramirez, and how Francona constantly had to weigh what was best for the team winning games with keeping the team together. How do you deal with a player who, for instance, takes himself out of the lineup more than a few times, once complaining of vague knee pain, but when the team MRIs both knees not even a minor irritation shows up?

You say "that's just Manny being Manny" and then enjoy the fact he hits the shit out of the ball. Also notice how Peter seems to take Francona's version of events and it causes him to change his mind about the situation. Francona surely could be in the right, but his book is only his point of view on the events as they occurred.

Ramirez was a great talent. He knew he could get away with murder, and did. The ownership group had the attitude: Don't tell me how tough the pregnancy was, just tell me if you delivered the baby. And it was up to the manager to make it all work. 

Not to take away the uniqueness of this situation, but this is how ownership usually works. They hire the manager to make the team work. If a guy has talent like Manny had then ownership probably works harder to make sure the manager doesn't alienate this player.

"She is so smart. She is so good. I can sit there and watch those cases all day. I really could. It's fun to watch just somebody who does their job well. And I could watch Judge Judy do cases all day. I could watch people play football that do their job really well. People that direct traffic. I get a real kick out of watching people that are good at directing traffic do it. I've done it for hours, watched it. I like football the most. But Judge Judy's right up there.''

-- San Francisco coach Jim Harbaugh, who took his father to a taping of the syndicated Judge Judy TV show. They had lunch together. From the sound of it, he liked what he saw.

My only question: What about Wapner?

I don't know Raymond, what about Wapner? Wapner is on in 15 minutes...

Mr. Starwood Preferred Member Travel Note of the Week

Have you noticed we use our cell phones too much in this country?

Yes, this has been commented upon constantly by many people. It's been noticed.

This is one half of a conversation I heard (the first three or four comments are close but perhaps not exact quotes, because by the time I got my pen out to write it down, the man was about a minute into the conversation)

Wait, so Peter is now taking a pen out to write down a person's phone conversation? Peter thinks it is odd for people to be on the phone a lot, but it's perfectly fucking normal to write down a conversation he overhears. I want someone to follow Peter King around all day and write down every conversation he has and then start a blog detailing Peter's daily conversations. It could be called "Conversations with Peter King" or something even more exciting than that. Who the hell writes down a cell phone conversation?

"Hi! Just waitin' to board here. What are you doing?"
...
"Well, went to the Burger King. Got a burger, some fries ... Yeah, pretty good, okay, you know. A burger ... Now just sittin' here, people-watchin.' You know.
...
"A little warm in here, you know. Better than that oven out there!!! ... Yeah, checked in. Got 7A. Window seat ... Yep. Like those window seats, you know.
...
"No, no, not that crowded. Guess people flew early today. Hardly had any wait at security. Maybe five, 10 minutes.
...
"Yeah, got some M&Ms at the little shop. Bag of chips. It's like, four hours or so. Was thinkin' of gettin' a sandwich, but I think that burger will hold me. Not too hungry now. I can get something when we land ... Yeah, yeah ... Well, yeah, don't think so.
...
"Okay, what else you got goin'? ... Yeah? Any good? Yeah, always liked that show ... Nope. Just sittin' here. Yeah, not much else up.
...
"Yeah, it'll be past dark when we get there ... I don't know, just go to sleep I guess. Maybe watch some TV at the hotel. I'll see what's on ...
...
"They're millin' around. Looks like we're gonna board here ... Yeah, no, no, I ain't in any hurry. What else you got goin'?''

On it went, until the guy, about 55, had to hang up to board.

This seems like a normal conversation from one spouse to another or one family member to another. It's a boring, typical conversation that one person is having with another. I have conversations like this with my mother, who sometimes just likes to hear from me. Why is this even noteworthy? Stop paying attention to other people's conversations you freak.

I just wanted to yell: "THEY GOT NOTHIN' GOIN' ON! OR THEY WOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING BY NOW!''

It's fucking semi-private conversation. Someone should yell back at your fat ass, "STOP WRITING DOWN WHAT PEOPLE SAY IN PUBLIC AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE CONVERSATION THEN IGNORE IT!"

Who does this? Who not only writes down a phone conversation between two strangers but then has the audacity to actually get annoyed at the boring nature of the conversation? It's a simple fix. Mind your own business or think about what a great sportswriter you are. Why does Peter King get annoyed at people in public like this? If I saw him writing down my phone conversation I would walk up to him, grab his notepad,  shove his pen into his belly, and then not-so-politely tell him to mind his own business.

I don't know. Maybe it's nice to keep in touch when you're apart from someone you like. But these phones. They severely reduce silence and thought. Both of those things are still legal in America, I hear.

Not everyone has the ability to communicate with others through a national football column. Quit writing people's conversations down, you freak. Who cares if someone is having a boring conversation? Why should that matter to you in your life? Mind your own fucking business and worry about yourself as opposed to worrying about what everyone else is doing.

"Dear person in front of me on plane: If you move your seat back just a little more I could probably remove that molar for you.''

-- @JPosnanski, NBCSports.com national sports columnist Joe Posnanski.

Feel your pain, Joe. Feel your pain. Assuming that was USAirways.

The constant bitching about traveling. What a hard life these sportswriters lead. People dare to have phone conversations and people lean too far back in plane seats. I have an idea. Rather than needlessly bitch to the general public about this person, why not tap the person on the shoulder and politely ask them to move their seat up? That's right, Joe Posnanski doesn't have the balls to talk to the person about the problem they are causing him, so he Tweets about it. If you aren't going to have the guts to fix your problem and you have the capability to immediately fix your problem, don't bitch. Grow some balls or live with it.

Ten Things I Think I Think

I think that Peter King needs more things to do if he has time to write down a stranger's conversation at an airport.

1. I think we all have our opinions, and they're all fine, and I haven't given one about the NFL players' top 100 list because I don't think the players take it seriously, and so I don't value it at all. But I saw that ESPN just named Paul Brown the sixth-best coach of all time. To me, that's like naming Bill Russell the sixth-best basketball player of all time, 

Yeah, Bill Russell may very well be the sixth-best basketball player of all-time. I probably would rank him right around that spot.

3. I think I love how Kellen Winslow announced his upcoming tryout with the New York Jets. Did it on Twitter thusly: "J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS!!!"

It's so creative, which I found odd. We all know Winslow is a soldier, but I thought creativity wasn't encouraged in soldiers like Winslow?

6. I think, and always have thought, that a team with a mobile or very smart quarterback and a good spread attack should just go for two after every touchdown, except when one point is needed late in a game.

I think saying words like "every" and using a blanket statement like this is NEVER a good idea.

The logic is simple.

Peter King thinks the logic he is using is simple. It's good to hear he doesn't confuse himself when using his own logic.

Say your team scores 40 touchdowns in a season. If you practice your top, say, five plays weekly during a short-yardage period (which all teams have on their weekly practice list), and you've got a smart quarterback who you trust to make good decisions, the likelihood is that you'll be able to convert from the two-yard line more than 50 percent of the time. 

Why is this 50% the likelihood? What sort of data is Peter using to confirm this is a correct figure? The answer: He's making it up.

I think teams should never go for a two-point conversion. If teams have a smart and mobile quarterback then they will only convert 25% of the time. There you go, I also created a number that supports my position.

Much more, in my opinion.

We did learn two weeks ago that Peter thinks a "factoid" is the same thing as him giving an opinion. It seems Peter does truly believe his opinion is fact.

Of those 40 touchdowns, let's say five are scored late, and a certain one point is more advantageous strategically than a risky two. Now we're down to 35 touchdowns. If you go for two every time, let's say you make 23. That's 46 points you'd score instead of 35.

I'm supposed to have a summer break from Gregg Easterbrook. You see the issue with this example, right? Peter is setting up a scenario, based entirely on speculation, which not-so-coincidentally helps to prove his point. He's making up situations and facts. My head hurts.

9. I think my guess is 2014 for the renewal of the Favre-Packers wedding vows.

I don't care, though I know Peter is salivating at the thought about being able to discuss Brett Favre again in MMQB. He's tried several times to shoehorn a Favre mention into MMQB, but the idea of real Favre-NFL content probably causes Peter to wet his pants.

10. I think these are my non-football thoughts of the week:

c. Pete Abraham is the best. The Boston Globe Red Sox beat man is a great Twitter follow (@PeteAbe) and good nicknamer. Dustin Pedroia is "Scrappy McScraperson.''

Absolutely hilarious. I will immediately follow Abraham.

e. David Ortiz (413 homers) catches Mike Piazza on the all-time homer list with 14 more, Cal Ripken with 18, Carl Yastrzemski with 39.

Where does he catch Ronde Barber on that list? Barber is the Carl Yastrzemski of the NFL.

f. Looked up at one point Saturday and Josh Hamilton was batting .217 and Albert Pujols .241. Combined on-base percentage: .296.

g. For $15.5 million a year, free agent C.J. Wilson has given the Angels a 17-15 record since arriving at the beginning of the 2012 season.

Using wins and losses only to evaluate a pitcher is dumb. Perhaps Wilson is 17-15 partly because the Angels two best hitters aren't hitting well? Maybe?

h. Anaheim: Where free agents go to cash checks.

Now that's hilarious and rich coming from a Red Sox fan. All I hear from Red Sox writers (and Peter King) over the past year has been how much wasted money has been spent on free agents like Carl Crawford, J.D. Drew, John Lackey, and (though he was acquired through trade) Adrian Gonzalez.

o. I don't mean me, personally, because I don't talk much about the NBA. But why don't we as a sporting nation talk about Tony Parker more? Shouldn't we think of him more as a great basketball player than as the former Mr. Eva Longoria?

Sometimes we reach a point where a person's cluelessness doesn't even merit a response. This comment has helped us to reach that point.

p. Coffeenerdness: I know I'm tough on Amtrak coffee, because it is swill.

I know I'm tough on you because you come off as an entitled tool.

r. I am a week late with this, but happy Bar Mitzvah, Devon Schefter. Not sure if you thought this was as cool as the rest of the partiers did, but the video someone verrrrrry close to you put together just might be the best Bar Mitzvah advice video in the history of Judaism. Everyone from Peyton Manning to the energetic Harbaugh brothers to Adam Sandler with words of wisdom for young Devon. My favorite was Sandler's, seated alongside his young daughter in their car: "Everyone in the family thinks you're a man now. One thing I ask of you: Don't touch this kid. You leave her alone. Don't touch her when you get older or you get this.'' [Clenched fist gesture].

I thought instead of a clenched fist Adam Sandler was going to threaten to make "Grownups 3." That would threat enough for anyone to take Sandler's advice.

s. You go, Emily Kaplan! Good luck at the Globe this summer.

t. You too, Tess Quinlan! Good luck at Yahoo! in New York.

u. And you, Evan King ... a published writer! Congrats to you.

The same guy who gets annoyed at a person's semi-public conversation on the cell phone insists on congratulating people in MMQB. I guess Peter doesn't understand that while he doesn't want to hear one side of a conversation, his readers don't want to read one side of his conversation/congratulations either. Peter has never been overly self-aware.

w. We still haven't forgotten, and never, ever, ever will I stop being ticked off at the chicken politicians -- I'd say something worse, but this is a family website -- in this country who refuse to vote for common-sense gun responsibility. Please read that story and tell me that we, as citizens, should sit idle while the country does nothing to prevent future massacres. And current ones.

It's so annoying to Peter when his opinion isn't everyone else's opinion. No gun laws will prevent future massacres. So using the word "prevent" isn't very realistic, but Peter is too far into his lecture to us about gun responsibility to care whether the prevention he seems to believe can exist really can exist or not.

y. I'll be away from this space for the next four Mondays, and, as I've done for the last five years, I have replacements to write the column. They are: June 17, Former Saints safety Steve Gleason; June 24, Oakland punter Chris Kluwe; July 1, New Orleans cornerback Jabari Greer; and July 8, TBA. 

Of course Chris Kluwe is writing for Peter. Peter has already advocated for Kluwe to have an NFL punting job by cherry-picking statistics to make Kluwe look better, so Kluwe should pay him back by taking over MMQB for a week while Peter is on vacation. Friends have to look out for each other you know.

See you back here on July 15, when we'll be one week from debuting our new football-centric site, The MMQB.

Wait, that's the title of the new football-centric site? "The MMQB." Not a very inspired site name. Not to mention, if someone does a search for "MMQB" they may not find the site initially, but find backlogs of Peter's MMQB column.

The Adieu Haiku

RGIII looks good.
Saw him sprinting on Thursday.
Opener? A lock.


The good news about Peter taking a month off is that we don't have to read his horrendous haikus for a month. 



Tuesday, April 9, 2013

10 comments MMQB Review: Gruden Knows Best Edition

Peter King has some thoughts about the NCAA Tournament in last week's MMQB.  He made a comment that Wichita State was 4-0 in the tourney, while not noting this is a pretty obvious statistic since a team has to win four games and not lose any in order to make the Final Four. Peter also said Seattle is an underrated food town because of the good pizza (since that's the only food available in Seattle) restaurants in the city. This week Peter passively-aggressively tries to get a cameo in a movie that honestly sounds like a bad "Moneyball" ripoff, he (cringes) makes a good point about the 2008 draft, breaks the news to us that Raiders haven't been very good over the past few years and has a travel note that isn't like his other travel notes, which I am still not sure what that means. And oh yeah, there aren't any elite prospects at the top of the NFL Draft. We'll see if this comment holds up 7-8 months from now when Peter is fawning over a rookie quarterback or the impact Jarvis Jones makes on defense for the team that drafts him.

Now this could be a lot of fun.

An October pool party celebrating Brett Favre's "Average interceptions per year" birthday, otherwise known as Favre turning 44?

On the night of the first round of the draft, April 25, at Radio City Music Hall in New York, a major motion picture starring Kevin Costner will begin filming. It's called Draft Day. It's about the Cleveland Browns dealing for the first pick in the draft, and the frenzied hours around the trade and the pick, and the drama includes Costner playing the general manager of the Browns (he's cuter than Mike Lombardi).

Son of a bitch, Peter. No one is homophobic around here, but don't go calling men "cute." No man wants to be called "cute" by another man. Okay, maybe not no one, but very close to no one.

What the hell kind of train of thought goes through Peter's mind when writing MMQB that leads him to calling another man "cuter than Mike Lombardi?" Is it an inability to think of adjectives or just pure laziness in wanting to think of other adjectives? Between Peter constantly writing "precocious," and "cute" in reference to grown men I'm really starting to worry about his ability to interact with boys between the age of 12-18. When he meets a friend's 13 year old son does he say, "Boy, Charles you are getting really, really cute?" Probably not. Then don't write it either.

I asked a veteran NFL operative who has read the Draft Day script about the movie, and he said, "Pretty realistic."

Count me in as not intrigued.

And there is a Costner love interest, working in the front office of the Browns, who could give the whole thing its requisite Hollywood touch. (Variety reported last week the movie could co-star Jennifer Garner.)

Just say no, Jennifer. Do it for Ben Affleck. He can't be married to a woman who started her career out so strong with "Alias" and then ended up being the love interest to Kevin Costner in a bad ripoff of "Moneyball." Have standards. You married the most successful Affleck brother, don't lower yourself to Casey's level.

One last note about Draft Day: Seems Costner's original team was going to be the Buffalo Bills. But late in negotiations for on-location filming, Ohio offered the filmmakers a better deal. (Much to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's chagrin, I hear. He got involved and tried to keep the picture as a total New York-based film.) So that's how he became Browns GM Kevin Costner, instead of Bills GM Kevin Costner.

I keep referring to this movie as a bad "Moneyball" ripoff without any proof. Come on, you know it is a bad "Moneyball" ripoff. The plot will include older scouts who like one player, younger scouts who like another player, Costner jumping ahead of a rival GM (who is most likely a dick to Costner) through trade to nab a great player, this draft will be Costner's last chance to put together a great team or he will be fired, and you know the Assistant GM for the Browns will also be a dick who only wants Costner's job because apparently there are no other NFL GM jobs available. Part of me hates sports movies because I feel like I can be given a small outline of the plot and I already know what will happen through most of the movie. Also, Costner will probably have a daughter and will learn to love again while also putting together a Super Bowl winning team.

Now for what I have this week:

• Jon Gruden on the "Shaky the Mohel'' quarterback class (Florio gets that) of 2013 ... and why he's smart to like Ryan Nassib.

Of course Jon Gruden likes Ryan Nassib! He likes everything. "This guy right here, he's the best at his position until I say next week another player is the best at that position!"

I know Jon Gruden is going to like the 2013 quarterback class too. He likes everything. He thinks communism is misunderstood. He liked "Gigli" and thinks Kim Kardashian has wasted talent.

• Reggie McKenzie on taking his medicine -- prescribed by Al Davis and Hue Jackson -- today, in hopes for a better Raider tomorrow.

Don't get me started on the Hue Jackson trade for Carson Palmer. It was a horrific trade masterminded by Jackson, but Raiders management had to in some way agree to it. I think Jackson gets a bad rap for having been a head coach for only one season. Yes, the Palmer trade was terrible, but it isn't like Jackson made that decision in a vacuum.

You'll see Jon Gruden at his cocky, snarling, football-smarts best this week, when he continues his must-see-TV series breaking down the top quarterbacks in the draft.

I have only watched one "Gruden QB Camp" and will never watch another one. It's boring and over-edited. Plus, he is having Manti Te'o on the show this year. It's bad enough I'm supposed to believe Jon Gruden is a QB genius when it comes to finding young talent (look at his record as a head coach, he isn't quite at genius level), but now he is evaluating middle linebackers in a desperate attempt for ESPN to get ratings? No thanks.

What I find interesting about these segments, mostly, is they show quarterbacks in their natural habitat, or what will be their natural habitat in the NFL: the tape room, with the whiteboard for a coach, or player, to draw up plays. And they show which quarterbacks can keep up with one of the best quarterback minds alive, Gruden.

Maybe I'm just way off or maybe there aren't that many best quarterback minds currently alive. For me, Gruden's reputation is bigger than his results. I guess I have higher expectations than Gruden has shown me or am looking for him to win games with a young quarterback. He's fantastic at taking veterans and having them run his offense well. I will give him that. I just don't think he is very good at identifying and developing young quarterback talent. I guess Chris Simms worked out well for a period of time, but then there is Bruce Gradkowski, Josh Johnson, Luke McCown, and Marques Tuiasosopo. Gruden is good, but I wouldn't say he is one of the best quarterback minds alive. Maybe I'm just being hard on him.

So much of what quarterbacks are asked to do these days in college football comes prescribed from the sidelines. All the pre-snap reads in so many programs are done by signal, and you wonder if quarterbacks, when they get to the NFL, can adjust to checks at the line and what the defense is throwing at the young passer. As Gruden said to me: "This guy knows a huge volume of plays, and he showed me he can execute the plays by reading what the defense is doing.''

BREAKING NEWS: Jon Gruden likes Geno Smith. Who could have foreseen this?

That's what's great about these shows. The players can't hide. Gruden throws friendly fire at them, but it's fire. They have to respond intelligently, or he'll eat them up. Affectionately, but you'll be able to tell they've got some recognition weaknesses.

He's talking about you Cam Newton. You couldn't recite a play from Auburn and that has translated to the NFL where you aren't a leader. You got Grudened!

I asked Gruden Saturday what he thought of the 2013 class of passers.

Spoiler alert: He probably fucking loves them. They are cute and precocious.

"Last year was a ridiculous year for quarterbacks,'' he said. "I mean, five starters right away. This year, it's like every one of these guys comes from broken quarterback families. Tyler Bray at Tennessee: recruited by Lane Kiffin, family moves to Knoxville, everybody's excited, and Kiffin goes to USC. Bray ends up playing for another coach, coach [Derek] Dooley, who didn't even recruit him.

Russell Wilson left N.C. State after three years and played for Wisconsin for only one year in a completely different offense, Andrew Luck lost his head coach to the NFL prior to his junior year (he did keep his offensive coordinator as his head coach), Ryan Tannehill played wide receiver for the majority of his college career, and Brandon Weeden started playing football after failing at being a professional baseball player. It's not like all of the 2012 class came to the NFL from a completely stable college environment. 

"Tyler Wilson at Arkansas: Bobby Petrino has his situation, he leaves, and Wilson -- now, he was the all-SEC quarterback under Petrino two years ago -- has to play in a disastrous situation at Arkansas, and he's wildly inconsistent last year. Matt Barkley at USC: Held that team together through all kinds of turmoil. Geno Smith at West Virginia: They go from one conference to a totally different one, and now he's playing at Baylor and Texas instead of the Big East -- and that's a huge difference -- and you're having to learn about new teams with new defenses while you have this 20-hour rule, all you can spend is 20 hours a week practicing and studying football, and how do you do that? So it's like nobody had the smooth sailing of some of the guys last year did.''

Yeah, I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. Again, Russell Wilson learned a completely new offense after leaving N.C. State and Ryan Tannehill was a wide receiver for most of his college career. I'm not sure how that can be defined as smooth sailing.

So as opposed to saying nice things about these quarterbacks he is making excuses for them. Geno Smith has to switch conferences and play in the same offensive system. The horror! Matt Barkley played in the same offense for three years. How did he manage to survive in such a non-stable situation?

I keep hearing both Nassib and Manuel as late-first-round prospects. Nassib in particular, and certainly more than Manuel. Gruden seems fascinated by both.

Jon Gruden would like a quarterback even if he didn't have legs and weighed 400 pounds. Gruden would talk about how the player has overcome so much and boy he can really hand out punishment when he runs. Plus, he's so hard to bring down with his bionic legs and 400 pound weight!

The Bills are coached by Nassib's four-year college coach, Doug Marrone. NFL types think Marrone loves him some Nassib.

What an unstable situation that was for Nassib.

I could tell by listening to Gruden he likes Nassib. A lot.

(Bengoodfella falls out of his chair due to being so damn shocked that Gruden likes a quarterback)

As for Manuel: "He'd be a fun guy to coach. Very fun. Can call any play. He can run any play. Upbeat. Powerful vibe around him. People just like him. They want to be around him. Loves the game. I really, really like this kid.''

Gruden's evaluations mean nothing to me. Absolutely nothing. He loves nearly every player he talks about. He's gushing about Manuel here and it means nothing to me.

Regarding Nassib and Manuel: "You want Nassib and Manuel on your team. You want to be around Nassib and Manuel. If you like those guys, you're on the right track."

Considering Gruden likes to collect quarterbacks he probably would draft both Manuel and Nassib, but no, you don't want them both on your team.

As the smoke begins to clear for the 2013 draft, this is obvious: No one loves the top of it. No one. When you talk to league people, you hear over and over about how this is a middle-class draft, with an egalitarian class from the teens until the middle of the second round, and no real can't-miss stars at the top.

I think some of the offensive linemen are "can't-miss" prospects, but drafting offensive linemen is absolutely no fun I guess. If Chance Warmack busts in the NFL I am going to be very, very, very surprised. At his absolute worst, he will be an above average NFL guard...at least in my opinion.

A history lesson, then, this morning. This draft is mindful of the 2008 draft, which, in retrospect, had a significantly better second 10 than top 10.

Let's judge the top 10 versus the second 10:

Premier players: In the top 10, there are two, Ryan and Mayo. In the second 10, I'd say there are three: Clady, Albert (a slight stretch, though a top-12 left tackle in this game today has to be considered premier) and Flacco. Jake Long would have been, had injuries not derailed his career. He still may be one, but he'll have to be sturdier in his new address, St. Louis.

I'm going to hold off on arguing Joe Flacco is a premier player for a while. I will silently fume to myself because I may be wrong in still thinking he is not.

Better than average players: Five in the top 10 -- Jake Long, Chris Long, Ryan, McFadden (marginally, because of his injuries) and Mayo. And I would say eight in the second 10 -- McKelvin, Clady, Stewart (4.7 yards per carry in a job-sharing career with DeAngelo Williams), Albert, Rodgers-Cromartie, Cherilus, Flacco and Talib.

And to add to this, in the defense of Jeff Otah, he was a good right tackle who just couldn't stay healthy and probably didn't like the game enough to stay healthy. In terms of playing the game, he was pretty good. So the 11-20 spots of the 2008 draft were pretty damn good.

Busts: Gholston, Harvey and Rivers in the top 10, only Williams and Otah in the second 10.

But again, Otah would not have been a bust if he wasn't injured a lot and loved the game enough to fight through injuries. He had talent, but was a bust in the end I guess.

Think of this draft. Who would be all that surprised if Jarvis Jones, Tavon Austin, Alec Ogletree, Xavier Rhodes, Desmond Trufant and Bjoern Werner go in the second 10 ... and outplay their peers in the top 10?

Well, I wouldn't be surprised because teams tend to reach for quarterbacks and I think Jones and Werner should go in the Top 10 picks based solely on talent alone. So if they fall to the 11-20 spots then I wouldn't be surprised to see them outplay some of the players in picks 1-10.

Raider fans: You want the good news or the bad news?

Haven't they suffered enough? Just go with the good.

The bad: Oakland is missing two of its top five picks in this year's draft (the second- and fifth-rounders), leaving the team with just one choice in the top 65, and will have about $75 million to spend on the salary cap this year, a league low. That's because of approximately $48 million in dead money from the normal $123 million cap each team has.

Ouch. I don't have the heart to even slip a Terrelle Pryor joke in here.

The good: In 2014, Oakland will be in the best cap shape of any team -- or very close to it -- because GM Reggie McKenzie took his cap medicine in his first two years on the job. The Raiders will have approximately $50 million to spend in free agency and to extend the contracts of good players on their roster next year.

So after they extend the contracts of the good players on the roster what are they going to do with the other $49.5 million?

What's that you say Raiders fans? Your favorite team hasn't gone 1-15 or 2-14 over the last decade? Shut up, I'm trying to be a bully.

Think about an NFL team having $75 million to spend on players in a year. 

Because I'm a cautious man, this sounds like a disaster-in-waiting to me. Too much money to spend is a bad thing sometimes for an NFL team.

"Yes, and we've talked about that,'' McKenzie said. "Remember -- the way I was raised in football, in Green Bay, was not as a big spender in free agency. I hope we continue to draft well, and I hope we can sign our own players, because that's the way I believe you win in this league. You draft, develop and sign your own players. Mark is on board with that, and what we have to do now and in the future, he's on board with and understands and he supports.''

Al Davis says only winning makes him understand and support the long-term plan for the Raiders. The only long-term plan is to be successful and win games. This is also the short-term plan.

The level of incompetence in the draft room by the Raiders is stunning. Over the past nine years they're the only team to not draft a Pro Bowl player in the first round. The year-by-year futility in drafting:

Let's spare our eyes and just say Darren McFadden is the only first round draft pick on the roster today and they haven't had a first round pick in the last two years. This year they have the #3 overall pick and I feel like Al Davis would have taken Tavon Austin in that spot.

Then Peter says really nice things about Jack Pardee, including this nugget/factoid that Peter could certainly learn from:

One other story: The Oilers were playing a preseason game one August Saturday evening in San Diego, and after the game, Pardee stuck around the stadium to tape his coach's show. His PR man, Chip Namias, and PR lieutenant, Dave Pearson, drove Pardee back to the hotel in a rental car. Pardee still was in his coaches' clothing for the show -- coaches' shorts and a polo shirt. On the way back to the hotel, he asked to stop at a Ralph's, a grocery store chain, so he could get some beer. They went into Ralph's, Pardee got two six-packs, and they went to pay. Only one checkout stand was open. So they waited. And waited. An NFL coach, in his coaches clothing, patiently waiting with his two six-packs 10, 15 minutes for the long line to go down, and not complaining.

Peter could learn some patience from Jack Pardee. I am sure Peter would stretch this story into a five paragraph complaint about the grocery store only having one lane open. I find it funny that Peter thinks it is amazing for an NFL coach to wait in a long line at the grocery store (which is what millions of people deal with on a regular basis), as if Pardee is above having to wait in lines with normal people. It tells me a lot about Peter that he is impressed by this story and it also lets me know that Peter probably does believe himself to be WAY too important to be inconvenienced by the normal everyday issues with which other people have to deal. Peter is an NFL writer. How dare he have to wait in line!

We hadn't heard much about the son of Gregg Williams, Blake Williams, since his dismissal by Jeff Fisher as Rams linebacker coach and defensive playcaller after the season -- until last week. NCAA Division II team William Jewell College of Missouri hired Blake Williams as defensive consultant and presumptive playcaller. Quite a precipitous fall.

Right, but remember that time Blake Williams was calling out the defensive calls so strongly in training camp last year? That...that...that was pretty neat for Peter to hear.

Mr. Starwood Preferred Member Travel Note of the Week

I just have to travel more. Two notes for you, not necessarily what you're used to reading as travel notes.

We are mostly used to reading about bitching and whining from Peter about how he has to wait in line or is inconvenienced by the lack of quality coffee available at a hotel...so there's really nothing we are used to reading as a travel note.

Two: Maybe wearing gym shorts and an old hoodie, with an open paper cup of coffee, and a dog laying at my feet, isn't the proper way to wait for one's wife outside a Food Emporium grocery store on the east side of Manhattan. There I was over the weekend, while my wife did a little shopping inside, and a guy walked out of the store toward me and fished out two quarters. "Here you go,'' he said.

That's fantastic. Peter must have been very offended he was mistaken for a homeless man by this guy walking out of the store. I'm surprised Peter didn't punch the guy in the face for daring to believe Peter was anything but NFL royalty. I'm guessing next time Peter is in public he will just wear a shirt that says, "I'm important and work for Sports Illustrated and NBC Sports. I have plenty of money, thank you." Sure, it is a long sign, but it would get the point across and not allow anything to think Peter is a disgusting, horrible, middle-class person who needs money.

I said, "No, no, no, I'm good. But thanks.''

Yeah, right. You know Peter kept this money. He probably thinks it is about time the general public started paying him directly for the delicious nuggets of football-related goodness he provides on a weekly basis.

Ten Things I Think I Think

2. I think the meaning of Terrell Owens, who turns 40 this year, catching passes from Tom Brady in a Los Angeles workout is this: Owens wants to continue his NFL career. Brady wants to have receivers catch balls from him when he works out. That is all. Not saying it's impossible that T.O. will end up in someone's camp, but I highly doubt it, and I highly, highly doubt it will be New England's.

What? So you are telling me there is a free agent who Peter doesn't think the Patriots would have interest in this offseason? I'm shocked.

3. I think around this time of year, everyone has an opinion, and for an analyst like Pro Football Weekly's Nolan Nawrocki to be highly critical of Geno Smith ("Not a student of the game, not committed or focused") is not surprising. Understand one thing: People like Nawrocki are not making this up. NFL scouts talk to people studying the draft, and they have opinions, and they understand that the analysts are going to put the opinions in their own words. Now, is Smith a bad student, or not focused? Not from what I have heard. But I probably haven't spoken to the same people Nawrocki has.

The question people are asking isn't whether Nolan Nawrocki has been making these evaluations up or not, but the question is if Nawrocki is only speaking and quoting those who have negative things to say about Geno Smith. It is just that the buzz surrounding Smith from other experts isn't that he has commitment or focus problems, so other draft experts are wondering how Nawrocki came to a different conclusion in his analysis of Smith. I think we all realize these experts talk to different people, but how can the conclusion Nawrocki reached be so different from what other draft experts perceive? So then the question goes back to Nawrocki's prior analysis of draft-eligible quarterbacks and whether that analysis is accurate now.

Do you think GM Buddy Nix is taking shortcuts on the eighth pick in the draft, and do you think coach Doug Marrone would take Smith, upon whose shoulders his future as an NFL head coach will depend, without doing full due diligence?

No, nobody thinks this. These draft experts don't all have to reach the same conclusion, but yet again, Nawrocki reaches a very different conclusion from other draft experts. It has become a sort of trend.

Who has succeeded more in the past few drafts? Atlanta GM Thomas Dimitroff made a risky move to deal for Julio Jones, which looks smart now. I didn't like Indy GM Ryan Grigson at the time for taking a second straight tight end in the 2012 draft, but Dwayne Allen turned out to be one of the best rookies in the league last year. Seattle GM John Schneider took Russell Wilson 75th overall last year, and everyone said he reached for the diminutive Wilson. Some reach. My point: Dimitroff, Grigson and Schneider aren't biting their nails because Nolan Nawrocki questions a player they like.

Leave it to Peter to miss the entire damn point of the whole discussion about Nolan Nawrocki's evaluation of Geno Smith. No one is afraid an NFL team will listen to Nawrock's analysis and blindly not choose Smith based entirely on what Nawrocki says. The concern is that Nawrocki has reached a very different conclusion about a black quarterback and this isn't the first time this has happened. THAT is the entire discussion being had about Nawrocki's evaluation of Geno Smith. The discussion has nothing to do with NFL teams and what they do/don't believe, but has everything to do with Nawrocki destroying another black quarterback in his evaluation prior to the NFL Draft.

7. I think Charles Woodson is right. He said the other day he's not been signed in free agency because teams think he's too old. What gave it away? The fact you're 36?

Says the guy who seems to completely misunderstand the criticism of Nolan Nawrocki's evaluation of Geno Smith.

9. I think (making an exception on my football thoughts of the week to include the loss of a great critic, Roger Ebert)

There's a section in Peter's "Ten Things I Think I Think" for what Peter calls his "non-football thoughts of the week." Wouldn't a thought about a movie critic be a natural entry into "non-football thoughts"? I guess not. So can we now expect "non-football thoughts of the week" and "non-football related non-football thoughts of the week" in MMQB? Between the three pages of Peter's thoughts, his Tweets of the Week, Quotes of the Week, and Travel Note, pretty soon I think MMQB is going to be 10 pages long and the only information about the NFL is going to be one chart on how well the Falcons have drafted over the last five years, along with a picture of Peter eating lunch with Roger Goodell.

g. The meaning, it seems to me, is that Roger Ebert was his profession's Troy Brown. Mr. Versatile, getting the job done in many different media.

I would be shocked if Roger Ebert didn't directly resemble a New England Patriots player. They are the only team who has players who can be directly comparable to a movie critic. I didn't think Troy Brown would be the Patriot that Peter would compare Ebert to though...

What about Wes Welker? He's always reliable and always there when you need him to be there for some help. You really dropped the ball on this comparison, Peter (like Welker started doing over the last year or two). You are the "Two and a Half Men" of your profession. No one is entirely sure how you have so many fans, but it seems like you take every chance you can to remind us and rub it in our face how well-thought of you are.

i. Jose Iglesias, 2012: eight hits, 68 at-bats. Jose Iglesias, 2013: nine hits, 16 at-bats.

It's almost like players mature and improve between October and April. That can't be true though, can it?

j. Rest in peace, Matthew Warren. The 27-year-old son of pastor Rick Warren suffered from depression. So sad.

Yes, Matthew Warren was so sad. Why do you have to be dick and mock his depressive condition?

l. Get wise, in a hurry, legislators standing in the way of real gun reform.

Get wise, and do what Peter tells you to do. Only the unwise don't listen to Peter on political matters. Peter is the Angelina Jolie of his profession. He's always willing to give his opinion and no one asked for it.

r. Happy opening day, Fenway.

Fenway Park, an inanimate object which has no feelings or way to communicate with anyone or anything, thanks you.

u. I'm a little late for Mad Men. Five years, to be exact. But it feels like a show I should catch up on.

And when you do, don't tell us about how you caught up or comment on the show. Thanks.

The Adieu Haiku

A key draft nugget:
Syracuse passer's name is
NASS-ib, not na-SEEB.


Who cares how Nassib's name is pronounced? All I want to know is if Peter finds Nassib to be cute. 

Sunday, July 4, 2010

10 comments Crazy NBA Free Agent Talk and Eric Winston's Ideas To Fix The NFL

I am not shocked the NBA free agent period has gotten off to a wild-spending start and I really shouldn't be. It happened last year when the Pistons opened up their checkbook and lost their common sense in giving Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva huge contracts. The Pistons lost their mind last year and they most likely regret it this year. This isn't the first time teams have done this on the first day of free agency. I am not even mentioning the contracts given out in the past to free agents like Jared Jeffries, Jerome James, and Brian Scalabrine. So basically the first couple of days in free agency is when the big-spending goes on...and often the big spending is not wise spending.

It happened again this year. Rudy Gay, who is maybe the 3rd best player on a good team got $16.4 million per year from the Grizzlies, who need him to be their 1st or 2nd best player. He scores, he is only 23 years old, but he doesn't play defense and hasn't shown the urge to be an even better player than he is now. Maybe this money will motivate him. Did I mention Gay was a restricted free agent and the Grizzlies could have seen how the market played out and offered him a contract later? Chris Wallace just got an extension I believe. The only extension he needs now is a cord to hand Grizzlies fans as they tie rope around the neck of dolls that look like Chris Wallace and burn him in effigy.

The Drew Gooden signing by Milwaukee for 5 years $32 million wasn't terrible, but he has bounced around a lot lately and I am not even sure if he should be a starter in the NBA or not. That's a lot of money over five years for a guy who may not even be a starter.

Amir Johnson got 5 years and $34 million because he is tall. Apparently the Raptors were impressed with the five game sample size where he started last year and averaged 17.8 points and 6 rebounds. Nevermind he has never shown that type of scoring or rebounding ability before. Shitty teams stay shitty because of signings like this. Also, the Raptors just drafted Ed Davis who plays the same position as Johnson.

My personal favorite is the Darko Milicic signing. 4 years and $20 million for 7 points and 5 rebounds (and I am rounding up) last year. Essentially Darko got this contract because he is tall. A reasonable person would anticipate the Timberwolves are going to regret paying Darko $5 million per year when he is providing them with 7 points and 5 rebounds. They may regret it today. I know teams need tall players, but is it necessary to overpay for them on the first day of free agency?

NBA teams save all of this money so they can spend that money on shitty players, or at least they have done this so far, and I don't get it. They spend their money like a high school graduate spends his graduation check on graduation week at the beach. I have no problem with teams spending money to improve themselves, but why jump on Darko with a contract like this after one day in free agency? If Darko's agent is half-way competent he will know if there are better options out there before Darko sign any contract, so I would assume the T-Wolves had the highest offer. They could have waited a while and I am sure if they had wanted Darko they could have gotten him at 4 years $20 million later in free agency. Amir Johnson is a bench player and he is now getting paid like a starter. I wish teams would save up their money to spend it more wisely.

-Eric Winston filled in for Peter King this week and had some ideas to improve and change the NFL. He didn't do a terrible job writing about this, but there were some of the ideas I wasn't exactly enamored with, plus there isn't too much other bad sportswriting out there before 4th of July weekend, so I figured I may as well discuss what Eric Winston had to say.

1. PLAY THE SUPER BOWL ON SATURDAY.

I agree with this idea on its face. It seems like a good idea and I have wondered why the NFL doesn't play the Super Bowl on Saturday. They may be concerned they wouldn't get the viewership they get on a boring Sunday night, and that makes sense. Many people who watch the Super Bowl on a Sunday may have other plans on a Saturday night.

Most sports fans would mention the house parties they attend to celebrate the big event. Others may think of their favorite sports bars where they can go and watch the game. It's safe to say the Super Bowl is synonymous with eating, drinking and getting together with friends.

The problem is that Saturday night is already synonymous with eating, drinking and hanging out with friends. Many people are going to go out and party anyway, so if the NFL had the Super Bowl on Saturday they would risk losing these casual observers because rather than be stuck in the house with nothing else on a Sunday night and watch the Super Bowl, these casual observers could go out and party with friends and don't watch the Super Bowl. So basically, the Super Bowl is a reason to go out and drink, but is a reason built around watching the Super Bowl on a Sunday, while if the game took place on Saturday night they would lose the people who have other things they want to do on a Saturday night. These are the casual fans.

Most people are able to enjoy themselves comfortably Saturday night because they have less obligations and responsibilities to attend to the next day. That's why it makes sense for the NFL to have its most important game on a Saturday.

At first thought, this is correct. As I stated above though, the NFL risks losing those people who go out and party on a Saturday night and don't like football enough to watch the Super Bowl. It does make sense to have the Super Bowl on Saturday, but the same people who like to party and go out to watch the Super Bowl on a Sunday night, but aren't NFL fans, will go do something else on that Saturday night instead of watch the game. That would decrease viewership.

I would love to have the Super Bowl on Saturday, but it becomes more of an event because nothing exciting happens on Sunday and the Super Bowl benefits from this in terms of high viewership.

No matter what day it is played on, diehard football fans are going to watch the game. But what about the casual NFL viewer? These are the ones who only watch if it is convenient for their schedule. To grow the audience of the Super Bowl, the NFL has to target those people.

Which is why the Super Bowl happens on a Sunday night and not a Saturday night. I think the NFL would lose the casual fan if they are presented with a better option on a Saturday night than the Super Bowl. Part of the lure of the Super Bowl on a Sunday night is that nothing exciting happens on Sunday nights. Saturday has more options to pull away the casual viewer, there's no way I think the viewership could actually be increased. What casual viewer isn't watching the Super Bowl on a Sunday night that would watch on a Saturday night if the Super Bowl took place then?

Conversely, Saturday is the night mom lets the kids stay up later while she watches Saturday Night Live, and that young professional is looking to relax after a long week. Grabbing these viewers, plus the diehards, would increase excitement while at the same time increasing viewership that adds new fans and increases revenue.

That young professional may also not be looking to stay in and do something and may want to go out and do something...which could involve not watching the Super Bowl. Who is to say these young professionals haven't already been grabbed by the NFL to watch the Super Bowl on Sunday night? I would love for the Super Bowl to be on Saturday night, but I think the NFL would lose viewers in doing this.

2. CHANGE THE SCHEDULE.


I propose changing the schedule to where each team plays every team in their conference plus one rival from the NFC.

Eric Winston just doesn't want the Texans to have to play the Colts twice a year. He thinks if they avoid the Colts twice a year the Texans will make the playoffs.

Let's face it, from year to year certain divisions are a lot stronger than others. In some years, the fourth best division champ is weaker than both wild card teams. Eliminating the divisions would guarantee the best teams make the playoffs.

I would like this idea based on the fact it would even the playing field by having each team play the same schedule. I am not for this idea though. I don't think there is a way to guarantee the best teams make the playoffs and if the fourth-best division champ is weaker than both wild card teams, what does it matter? If that's the case then the wild card team will have a chance to play the third and fourth-best division champ in the first round of the playoffs and beat them. No one really gets hurt in the current format.

Also, I don't like the idea NFC teams never play certain AFC teams (other than their "rival" in the other conference) except in the Super Bowl. That's another reason I don't favor this idea.

Three, it would add a brand new aspect to the league year -- cross-conference rivalry week. I love this idea. It's like interleague baseball, but for just one game a season. There are some great rivalries (Texans-Cowboys, Steelers-Eagles, Jets-Giants, Raiders-Niners, etc.) that would be awesome to see annually.

So Eric Winston is all about the great rivalries, but he wants to cause the Eagles-Cowboys, Giants-Eagles, Steelers-Ravens, and Broncos-Raiders rivalries to only happen once a year instead of twice a year? That doesn't make much sense to me. Steelers-Eagles isn't even close to be on par with the Eagles playing the Cowboys or Giants twice a year.

3. EXPAND THE ROSTER AND CREATE A MINOR LEAGUE.

Currently, NFL teams have 53 players on the roster and only 45 are active on Sundays. Roster limitations create issues for coaches and front offices as the season heads down the stretch. It also forces players to conceal injuries and play hurt, knowing their roster spot might depend on it. By expanding the roster by, say, six (59 total, 51 active), it gives coaches, executives and players more options on a weekly basis, like having backups who have been on the roster all season, and not simply plucked off the street. This also would allow teams to keep "bubble" players out of camp and let the team develop them.

I do sort of like this idea, but it also has drawbacks. What I love about baseball is how players are developed in the minor leagues and then eventually make their way to the majors. I don't know if it is viable in the NFL or not, but I wouldn't mind seeing an NFL-created league where teams are affiliated with NFL teams. The problem lies in that NFL teams would have another 53-man roster in the "minors" and that's a lot of football players. I don't know if the minor league football would be worth watching and just expanding the current NFL rosters may be a better and more cost-effective idea.

4. ESTABLISH A SENSIBLE ROOKIE WAGE SCALE.

How rookies get paid is the subject of much debate in the NFL. Here's my solution:

First rounders: Four-year contracts. Can't be franchised in fifth season.

Second rounders and below: Three-year contracts. Can't be franchised or restricted in fourth season.

All picks: 90% or more playing time = $1 million bonus
80% or more playing time = $750,000 bonus
70% or more playing time = $500,000 bonus
60% or more playing time = $400,000 bonus
50% or more playing time = $300,000 bonus

I may be confused, but I thought the length of the contracts wasn't the problem, but the monetary value of the contracts was the issue? A first-round lottery pick could still make a ton of money from a huge contract he signed as a lottery pick, but the contract is now shorter. This also brings up the question of why a team would sign a quarterback drafted in the lottery to a large four-year deal and then watch him sit for two years while they pay him a lot of money for sitting and knowing they will have to re-sign him in two years? Even if a team starts that quarterback from Day 1 of training camp, he will reach his potential (in a best case scenario) in his third year. This just seems like a short contract for a high draft choice.

That's just one example, but quarterbacks and receivers take a while to develop, so why would a team not be able to sign these long-term project players to a longer contract? Maybe this would work, but there is no point in drafting a quarterback in the second round and then starting him his third year only to have to re-sign the guy after that year. The same thing goes with a second round receiver or any other position. Later round players generally take longer to develop, but the contracts won't reflect this and shorter term contracts will end up with later round players being pushed into a position before they are ready just so NFL teams can see if that guy is a good player before he becomes a free agent.

5. CHANGE OVERTIME.

The second problem I have with the current OT is the arbitrary way the team gets the ball. Again, after a great game, the team that gets the first chance to win is the one who wins a coin flip. How is that the way to help decide a game?

There has to be some arbitrary way to decide which team gets the ball first in overtime, the coin flip as annoying as it may be, is just one of those ways to decide which team gets the ball first.

If you want to keep the current system, the ball should be given to the team with the most penetrations inside the 20, most total yards, least amount of penalties, or any way determined by what takes place on the field. But certainly not a coin flip.

So which team gets the ball first should be decided by a different arbitrary method?

For example...Say one team gets inside the 20 yard line four times and the other team gets inside the 20 three times. The game goes to overtime. The team that got inside the 20 yard line four times got three field goals out of their visits in the 20 yard line off three interceptions. Why should a team that has three interceptions in a game and moves into the other team's 20 yard line based on these interceptions get the ball first if the other team held that team to three field goals? Shouldn't the team that stopped the ball three times for three field goals be the one that gets the ball first since they have shown themselves to be a great defense and the other offense has shown itself to not be as good of an offense?

The team with the least amount of penalties is also a dumb way to decide which team gets the ball first in overtime. You may as well use a coin flip at that point.

My OT would start with the team who had the most possessions inside the 20 and letting them have the decision if they want the ball or not.

This is still arbitrary and not completely fair...just like the coin flip.

After play started, both teams would be guaranteed a shot at the ball. After both teams have their possession, and if it's still tied, then it goes to sudden death.

How is possession in sudden death decided? Probably a coin flip. So why would two teams play for 60 minutes and at that point a coin flip is too arbitrary to decide possession, but after each team gets one more possession the coin flip becomes the perfect way to decide possession in overtime? Why does every overtime idea that is predicated on the coin flip being "too arbitrary" eventually end up using the coin flip after each team gets one more possession? What does one more possession do that 60 minutes of football didn't do to make the coin flip more fair?

This is the end of Eric Winston's ideas to improve the NFL. Get this though...when he is deciding which teams will make the playoffs in the AFC (he leaves the Jets out and puts his Texans the Dolphins in the playoffs) he writes this:

I know I didn't put the Jets up there, and I don't mean any disrespect by it. They are loaded, but putting the pieces together can be tough in a short time period of time. I felt like there would be an odd man out in the AFC East and I just flipped a coin. Sorry, Jets.

THAT'S AN ARBITRARY AND STUPID WAY TO DECIDE WHICH TEAMS SHOULD MAKE THE PLAYOFFS! AFTER 30 MINUTES OF TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHICH TEAMS IN THE AFC WILL MAKE THE PLAYOFFS YOU JUST FLIP A COIN?

The 5th or 6th team in the AFC playoffs should be decided by what happens in Eric Winston's head not a coin flip. Or perhaps the 5th or 6th team should be decided by which team has the fewest letters in the team name or has the most players of Hispanic descent. But certainly not a coin flip!

SAINTS -- It's hard to see them not making it back to the postseason, although if the defense doesn't make the same big plays (pick-sixes, forcing turnovers, key stops, etc.) there could be some fall off. Drew Brees, though, is probably worth 10 or 11 wins minimum.

Which is why in the four years Brees has been with the Saints they have won 11 games exactly once. They have won 10, 7, and 8 games previous to that. So apparently Brees is worth 7 games minimum.

Sorry, I don't mean to bash the Saints, but Brees hasn't shown he is worth 10-11 wins minimum every year.

PACKERS -- It's a coin flip between them and the Vikings in the North.

For someone who hates coin flips, Eric Winston sure uses a lot of them to decide things in this column.

Call me crazy, but I think the Bears will be good. It seems like a lot of people are waiting for the Mike Martz-Jay Cutler relationship to blow up, but I see Cutler putting up big numbers if his offensive line holds up.

Of course he doesn't have the Bears in the playoffs, so he must not think the Bears will be that good.

The Bears offensive line is their biggest perceived weakness. If the biggest perceived weakness of every NFL team turns out to not be a weakness of course that team would have a better than expected year.

8. I think if soccer wants to get big in America, it needs to do what every other American sport has done: Cater to the offense.

If soccer wants to be popular in America, the rules should be changed so it doesn't look like the type of soccer other countries in the world play?

My suggestion for soccer? Make it 10 on 10. By taking one guy off, it will allow for the skill guys to have more space to do the amazing things that on occasion you see them do.

So yes, he thinks we should change the rules for how soccer is played...if the rest of the world wants the United States to get excited about soccer, which apparently would be a privilege for the rest of the world. Who says the United States expects the rest of the world to cater to them?

Enjoy the fourth of July weekend everyone.