Showing posts with label field goals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label field goals. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

6 comments MMQB Review: Peter King Raises His Johnny Manziel Game

Peter King included his newest MMQB feature "Quotes by Chip Kelly" in last week's MMQB (okay, that's not the name but it's basically what the feature is) which features super-deep quotes by Chip Kelly. Peter also made up with Cam Newton, which showed the maturity of Cam Newton to Peter King, in last week's MMQB as well. Peter filled his readers in on his thoughts about the MLB trade deadline deals, Joe Philbin's new caring nature, and had to move some NFL content out of MMQB to make room for all the other crap that's non-NFL related he puts into the weekly column. This week talks Johnny Manziel because of pageviews, talks about the eternal fight to help Jake Locker be a more accurate passer, talks about Michael Sam because more pageviews, and tells his readers how he got knocked over with a feather this week. And no, it wasn't because of a quote made by Chip Kelly.

At his locker in the visitors’ quarters Saturday night, not long before the clock struck midnight at Ford Field, stood safety Donte Whitner, the ebullient Cleveland Brown. Not a lot of people would be thrilled to be a Brown. But Whitner, born in Cleveland and educated at Glenville High on 113th Street in the city and then at Ohio State, had to soak it all in Saturday in the bowels of this stadium.

I've soaked in the bowels of things before and it isn't quite as ebullient as Peter is making it to be. The bowels can be quite messy at times.

“I stood in front of the mirror in the bathroom for 10 minutes, just staring,” Whitner said. “So strange. Like, I’m a Brown. My heart’s been here, and now I’m here.”

In related news, the Browns were offering Whitner more money than other NFL teams were offering, which helped guide his heart.

Whitner knows what Cleveland the city wants.

It's not hard to figure out. The city wants a winning NFL team and to make the playoffs a few seasons in a row. I'm not even from Ohio and I know this.

Close, with Manziel gaining fast on the turn into home …

There has been one preseason game. One. Yes, there is no turn into home yet. In terms of the offseason the Browns are just approaching third base. Let's let there be at least one more preseason game and then speculate whether Johnny Manziel is the Browns starter or not. I understand that seems way too logical, but there is more football and practice to be played.

This looked clearly to be Hoyer’s gig, at least to start the season. Not anymore. The gap has closed significantly, and Saturday night was Exhibit A why.

Because Manziel puts asses in the seats, increases interest in the team, and has the higher upside then Brian Hoyer might have?

“It’s been fierce,” Whitner said. “Two guys fighting for their lives. It’s close. I’d say [the locker room] is split about 50-50. We know they both can play.”

The locker room is split 50-50 on which quarterback should be the starter. What could go wrong in this situation when half the locker room wants one quarterback to start and the other half wants another quarterback to start? Fortunately, this story is almost over and the turn into home is gaining fast. 

But it hurt him on a fourth-and-short when he rolled right and ran for the sticks, bypassing what would have been a medium- to big-gain throw to fullback Ray Agnew; Manziel barely made the necessary yard for a first down.

Which is the point isn't it? The point is to gain the first down on fourth down? If Manziel had thrown to Agnew and Agnew dropped the pass or the pass was off-target then writers like Peter would be talking about how Manziel needs to trust his natural athleticism and run for the first down.

That’s not a smart way in the NFL because it’s just going to get him hit more. And at his size, the object is to let the other offensive guys get hit, not him.

Agreed, but he did get the first down and keep the chains moving. I've never heard of Ray Agnew, but I may have run for the first down also if I was Manziel.

The fact that Manziel is close heading into one of the last tests Monday night against Washington (Browns coach Mike Pettine ideally would like to name a starter by game three of the preseason) is surprising.

Two things:

1. Maybe the turn to home is coming fast if Pettine is trying to name a starter after the next preseason game, but why is it surprising Manziel is close to Hoyer? I like Hoyer, but he's not the future in Cleveland, he's not the exciting quarterback and he's not selling tickets. Manziel is. So if the competition is close, Manziel may be the starter.

2. Supposing Manziel does win the quarterback job, are we going to get written columns from guys like Ross Tucker and Gregg Doyel that their whole "Manziel is partying too much and should be more focused on studying" narrative was wrong and somehow Manziel has found a way to have a good time and study the Browns' playbook? Manziel is who he is, so if he manages to gain ground on Hoyer I think it would be nice if those sportswriters who wrote "Manziel is partying to much, the Browns are concerned and oh my God there is a picture of him with alcohol" columns would write an "I was wrong" column. It won't happen of course. Sportswriters jump to conclusions when they are right, but hold out for judgment when they feel they could be wrong.

Manziel wasn’t entirely sure of himself, and he was making a few mental errors and not playing with his usual confidence in practice. The Browns wondered if he’d come back in top mental and physical shape.

It's almost like he is a rookie quarterback who was in college just a few months earlier.

But how much difference is Hoyer’s experience, really? He’s thrown 193 NFL passes and started four games. This isn’t the Arizona Kurt Warner we’re talking about.

Simply having been in the NFL for multiple seasons is how Hoyer has gained experience. Quarterbacks learn and improve simply by being in an offensive system and being familiar with how the NFL works in terms of the season-long grind and what is expected of a starting quarterback.

One more “but” for Manziel: He can’t be running at Saturday’s rate—six times in six series—and survive. Which he knows. “Obviously,” he said, “that’s not the plan, for me to get that many carries every week. The better I get at progressions, the more I get comfortable with the play calls and the scheme and what we’re trying to do and pre-snap looks, the more and more I continue to get better over time. And less and less running. Hopefully that will weed out.”

Oh no! Manziel said "weed" in a sentence. He's referring to marijuana! Are you a pothead Manziel?

Whitner said. “Very respectful. He’s earning his keep so far. He’s not asking for any privileges. He’s just a rookie, and he’s acting like one. When we have the rookie show, he’ll sing just like the rest of them. As far as football goes, I’m seeing him put the ball on the money like a veteran. Sometimes the receiver drops it. Sometimes the receiver isn’t even looking for the ball and it bounces off him.

Son of a bitch. It sounds like the Browns big issue isn't the quarterback position, but who the hell is going to catch the football when Hoyer/Manziel throws it to them. Good grief. Whitner is like, "Sometimes the receiver is eating a burrito while running the pass pattern and isn't paying attention to the play call. On occasion the receiver has his hands in his pockets while running a route and doesn't bother taking them out of his pockets to catch the football. In fact, we actually don't have wide receivers on the 90 man roster right now."

On the field, he was the spitting image of the Texas A&M Manziel, throwing BBs and running when he wanted. I thought he’d be a bit tentative and not as decisive as, say, he was against Alabama in his defining college games. Not at all. He was who the Browns drafted.

What a complete and utter shock! So Peter is reporting that the quarterback who was known in college for his confidence and inability to feel pressure in big games doesn't feel pressure in an NFL exhibition game or in practice? In fact, Manziel is playing quarterback like he did with Texas A&M? How unforeseen! I thought for sure Johnny Manziel would start throwing the football left-handed or be too shy to talk in the huddle once he reached the NFL.

When he finished showering and dressing (white button-down Oxford shirt, dress jeans)

Thanks Fashion Police. I read MMQB to find out what the players are wearing after the game. "JOHNNY, WHO ARE YOU WEARING TONIGHT? OTHER THAN ONE OF THE TWO BLONDES THAT ARE ON EACH ARM, OF COURSE (PETER HI-FIVES DON BANKS)!" 

after the game, he stood at his locker and quietly talked on his phone or talked to a couple of the team PR guys softly. In front of the press, it was all about the team, and about progress.

Buzz Bissinger is already preparing his "Johnny Manziel is too team-oriented to win a Super Bowl because he doesn't enjoy talking about himself" article for whichever newspaper is offering him the most money to do a hack job on Manziel.

“We need him to be Johnny Football,” Whitner said.

Well, Johnny Football for the foreseeable future runs for the first down, gets hit more than he needs to and will probably go to a bar in the next seven days. He's the same guy he was at Texas A&M right now, which apparently surprises the shit out of nearly every sportswriter in America.

Michael Sam has been one of the most famous people in America over the past six months, since he announced he would try to become the first openly gay player to win a spot on an NFL team.

I honestly would forget Michael Sam was in the NFL if I wasn't constantly reminded by every sportswriter that goes to the Rams camp that Michael Sam is in the NFL and is not a heterosexual. Michael Sam hasn't been out in the public eye and simply wants to be a football player. The sports media will not have that. They have to point out what a HUGE story his being in the NFL is and that Michael Sam has done a great job of blending in, despite the media's attempts to not allow this to be the case.

The Rams picked him in the seventh round of the May draft,

I HAD NOT HEARD ABOUT THIS! PLEASE RECAP THIS EVERY TIME YOU MENTION THE RAMS!

What's irritating to me about this is that Peter King is doing exactly what Michael Sam does not want him to do. Sam has shown he doesn't want attention and would like to just fit in with the team. But no, despite the key to the Rams season being Sam Bradford's health and performance, Peter's takeaway from the Rams camp is mostly about how Michael Sam is fitting into the team. Peter will NOT allow Sam to just be another football player. He's not the only sportswriter who does this. In terms of the Rams team having success this year, Michael Sam is a small part of this, but for some reason most of the coverage Peter provides in MMQB is about Michael Sam. Talk football in MMQB. Michael Sam is brave and great, but as a fan, I want to know about the Rams team, not about a 7th round backup defensive end who may or may not make the team.

That’s the football news coming out of St. Louis on Sam. The social news is better than I thought it would be. Far better. Sam’s been like wallpaper. Unnoticed, fits in well. He’s said no to every national interview request—Katie Couric, Anderson Cooper, everyone—and will continue to do so, I’m told. “The only time we talk about the story,’’ Jeff Fisher said, “is when someone from the media comes in and asks about it. I can’t emphasize enough how smooth and uneventful it’s been. Mike has been great.”

If it weren't for the fact that Jeff Fisher needs the media to keep propping him up as a top NFL head coach, he might just point out more angrily that Sam is only a story because the media desperately wants to make it a story. Michael Sam wants to just fit in, but the sports media will not have that. They want to talk about his story at length now and then in a couple of years marvel at how no one cared about the second gay player to be on an NFL team and it wasn't a huge story. You know what, Sam is only a story because sportswriters like Peter want to make him a story. To me, he's just a football player trying to make an NFL team. I'm a fan. I don't care if he has sex with sea turtles, mostly because I know there are dozens of other NFL players that do nasty sexual things that would make Michael Sam's relationship with his boyfriend look tame in comparison. Personal lives are great, but I watch the NFL for the football. Can we talk about that?

“What he’s doing,’’ said former NFL player Wade Davis, who came out as gay after his short pro career, ‘is saying, ‘Everyone knows I’m gay, and let’s not make it the secret no one talks about.’ It’s Michael Sam fitting in.

The fact the Rams team confronts Michael Sam's sexuality mostly when the media asks them about it probably eludes Peter King.

The Rams made no special accommodations for Sam, and he asked for none.

For God's sake, he's gay, not physically handicapped. What accommodations would Peter expect Sam to ask for? I really want to know this.

Sam played 33 snaps and seemed to tire near the end of the game. But he had two strong rushes, one on a fast outside move—he dropped 13 pounds to 257 in the month before camp. He needed to be faster, he thought, and so he lost weight and got a smidge quicker.

Enough about this football shit, start talking about how Michael Sam is fitting in and continue pushing the story that you constantly say isn't a story until you bring it up again.

The fact that he had just made history, as the first openly gay player in the league, was secondary in his mind all night.

Maybe the fact Peter refuses to discuss Sam Bradford, who is the real key to the Rams success this year, will help Bradford in some way. I can't wait until the Rams go 6-2 and Peter writes a column about how NOBODY was focused on Sam Bradford in the preseason because WE WERE ALL focused on Michael Sam and that Sam Bradford's improvement was the real key to the Rams 6-2 start.

Barring injury, eight St. Louis defensive linemen (Robert Quinn, Chris Long, Williams Hayes and Eugene Sims at end, Michael Brockers, Kendall Langford, Aaron Donald and Alex Carrington at tackle) are likely to make the team. Jeff Fisher is likely to keep nine defensive linemen, though depending on special-teams contributions from other spots he could keep as few as eight or as many as 10. Say it’s nine.

It's nine. There, I said it.

Sam’s doing everything right. Now he needs a big hit on a quarterback in the final three games, or a few pressures from his lighter weight making him faster. Said Rams VP of football operations Kevin Demoff last week:

(Peter's cell phone rings) "This is Peter! How can I help you?"

(Marvin Demoff) "I hate how you answer the phone. You are at  Rams camp. Get at least one quote from my son, please."

(Peter King) "Mr. Demoff, I will do---Hello? It hurts me when you hang up on me, Marvin."

“He’s got four games to prove he belongs.” Three now.

THE TURN TO HOME IS CLOSE!

Extra points from the 15. Two got missed in 16 games over the weekend. Good. The extra point should be harder, and I don’t consider kicking from the 33 much of a hardship. 

Well, this is a misleading statistic because the Panthers backup kicker missed an extra point. Their regular kicker, Graham Gano probably wouldn't have missed the kick, which means one would have gotten missed in 16 games.

The Competition Committee wants it to be a play that matters, with something on the line—not a 99.6 percent sure thing, which it is now.

What do the fans want? Do the fans want a game decided on a missed extra point that counts for three points if it were a field goal attempt? Do the fans want Andrew Luck to drive 90 yards in two minutes to score a touchdown only to have the game lost because his kicker couldn't hit the extra point? I recognize that the kicker is part of a football team, but something in that scenario doesn't seem right to me.

Matthew Stafford had better stay healthy. I can’t imagine the Lions doing anything but mailing in the rest of the season if Dan Orlovsky, a heck of a nice guy, had to play. He just can’t do it, as Saturday night’s performance at Ford Field illustrated.

I don't know how Dan Orlovsky is still in the NFL. Does he have compromising pictures of someone high up in the league office? 

Completion percentages, by season, in Jake Locker’s college (University of Washington) and NFL (Tennessee) career:

A few years ago I covered how Chris Palmer was trying to make Jake Locker a more accurate quarterback. I expressed that I wasn't sure this could happen because quarterbacks don't always go from a 54% college passer over four years to a 60% passer in the NFL. Peter was more optimistic than I was.

Year Team Pct. Attempts
2007 Washington .473 155
2008 Washington .538 93
2009 Washington .584 394
2010 Washington .554 332

College total .540 1,147
2011 Tennessee .515 66
2012 Tennessee .564 314
2013 Tennessee .607 183
NFL total .572 563

Well, Locker has improved, but the struggle continues. He wasn't an accurate quarterback at Washington and he hasn't been totally accurate in the NFL either. Of course it doesn't help he can't stay healthy.

Average completion percentage across the NFL last year: .612. In six college and pro seasons, Locker has never reached that number.
 
“His stats are what he is,’’ said new coach Ken Whisenhunt. “But that doesn’t mean he can’t change.”

It sort of does though. Locker is improving, but he's never been an accurate passer and that's fine. Just don't act like after seven NFL and college seasons he is going to suddenly start throwing at a 65% clip.

Whisenhunt has participated in the career upturns of Ben Roethlisberger, Kurt Warner and Philip Rivers.

But they were all quarterbacks who threw the ball at a higher completion rate in college than Locker did. They went from average to really good, not below average to average. That's the point. Maybe getting to average is where Locker will be after his career upturn. It's not being critical of Locker, it could just be a fact about his play at the quarterback position. Being healthy is more important than his accuracy if you ask me.

“Do you think Jake’s your quarterback of the future?” I said.

“I hope so,’’ Whisenhunt said.

Jake Locker must be blushing from receiving such praise from Whisenhunt. What a vote of confidence.

“I have tremendous confidence in what we’re doing, and I think if you throw the ball with conviction you’re going to be a more accurate thrower,’’ Locker said.

Yes Jake, throwing the ball with more conviction will make you a better passer. That's why Cam Newton is so successful at throwing the ball 10 feet over the receiver's heads, because he throws with such conviction.

The Kansas City quarterbacks witness Bengals quarterback Matt Scott puke through his facemask. Taking a shotgun snap, he pukes again.

“I did it before,” said Scott, the former Arizona Wildcat, still energized, walking off the field a little wobbly after the game. “Against USC. I got hit hard, puked, and threw a touchdown pass on the next play. Then they took me out.” Turns out he shouldn’t have been in the game after the hit. He’d been concussed.

College athletics everyone! Always looking out for their "student-athletes."

Fast-forward two days. Tough business, the NFL. Scott is already number four on the Bengals’ QB depth chart, and Cincinnati signed another passer, Tyler Wilson, for camp competition on Saturday.

Did Peter expect the Bengals to keep Scott simply because he threw up and then threw a touchdown pass? Also, it's Tyler Wilson. I don't think Mike Scott should be too concerned.

Andy Reid Self-Parody Department: Pre-Reid, Kansas City ranked first in the league, running on 50 percent of first downs in 2012. That plummeted to 33 percent (30th) last season, Reid’s rookie Chiefs’ year.

That's not Andy Reid doing self-parody, that's how he runs his offense. At least the Chiefs don't have a good running back that could carry the football and their strength on offense lies in their quarterback. That's reassuring for Chiefs fans to know as the 2014 begins.

“I thought we’d come out and be sharper than that and execute better than that. Disappointed in the way that we played.”

—Oakland coach Dennis Allen, after Matt Schaub’s three series in the first preseason game at Minnesota ended in punt, punt, punt … and without a first down.

I wonder if Dennis Allen ever wakes up in a cold sweat and says, “Mark Davis is going to fire me after three years and I never had a quarterback who gave me a chance to win.”

Has anyone seen Jake Delhomme and Matt Schaub in the same room at the same time? Also, Matt Schaub is making $8 million this year. I assume if he gets benched then Peter will start railing on him weekly for being a complete waste of a human body, just like he did to Josh Freeman last year. Right? He'll do this? After all, Freeman wasn't even making $8 million to do nothing for the Vikings.

“We don’t have any glaring holes. We do have a glaring lack of experience.”

—Les Snead, the general manager of the Rams, to me. St. Louis had the youngest roster in the NFL last season, and likely will again this year.

Jeff "8-8" Fisher can't be expected to turn the Rams around in such a short time. The Rams are building something special, just give Fisher more time. That's all he needs. The Rams are young, in a tough division, and just need more time to become a great team. After all, how often does a coach like Jeff Fisher put aside all those things he has to do in order to coach your team? By the way, Fisher has almost the same record in two years with the Rams as the "hot seated" Joe Philbin and has nearly the same career winning percentage as Ron Rivera and Rex Ryan. Interesting how the hot seat works in the NFL doesn't it? Rivera and Ryan were one bad season away from being fired, while Fisher is pretty freaking comfortable in St. Louis. But as Peter would point out, I'm being hard on Jeff Fisher. The Rams are young and in the NFL you can't turn a team around in two years. It's impossible.

Then Peter gets excited and starts deciding which teams will dominate the 2015 NFL Draft because of how many picks they have. Remember that it was August 11 when Peter King started talking about the 2015 draft. Remember this when Peter is bitching and moaning about all of the 2015 NFL Draft discussion in March 2015. He's part of the problem.

Chip Kelly Wisdom of the Week

(Makes wanking motion with his hand)

“Seriously, the depth chart, I don’t care. I think [Eagles director of public relations] Derek [Boyko] did it. I mean, it’s absolutely nothing. I know we’re going to get questions on it, and I’ll be honest with you, I do not care how that’s listed. I said a long time ago, it’s written in sand, it’s written in water, it can be written in anything. That depth chart means absolutely nothing. The only reason we make one is because they [NFL officials] tell us to make one.’’

Deep thoughts. I'm glad Peter took the time to pass on this wisdom. At least Peter didn't leave out any information in MMQB about NFL teams he visited on his camp tour in order to include this Chip Kelly quote, like he did last week.


 
Everyone’s an expert. Everyone’s a media expert. I do believe, Kevin, that there won’t be much of finality judged after a first preseason game.

Peter wrote previously in this MMQB that he has only watched television once during his training camp tour, which means he hasn't seen ESPN's extensive coverage of Johnny Manziel pretty much doing anything. So yeah, Peter, everyone is a media expert, but some people are paying attention of late. Peter claims there won't be much finality judged after a first preseason game. I don't know, it seemed that way sometimes when turning on ESPN this weekend. Also, in this very MMQB Peter King wrote the following about Manziel:

Whitner said all the right things about the competition between Hoyer and Manziel, which does appear close in the wake of Saturday’s preseason opener here. Close, with Manziel gaining fast on the turn into home … which no one expected a month ago. This looked clearly to be Hoyer’s gig, at least to start the season. Not anymore. The gap has closed significantly, and Saturday night was Exhibit A why.

Manziel outplayed Hoyer in the 13-12 loss to Detroit, but the rookie (seven of 11 for 64 yards and no touchdowns or picks, six carries for 27 yards) was a B and the vet a C or C-plus. Not enough to tip the scales, yet. But from the first throw of the two quarters he played—a lasered eight-yard out route to Anthony Armstrong—Manziel was the player he’d been at Texas A&M in terms of confidence and running the game his way.

The fact that Manziel is close heading into one of the last tests Monday night against Washington (Browns coach Mike Pettine ideally would like to name a starter by game three of the preseason) is surprising.

Too much confidence? I saw the right amount on the field, and, for what it’s worth, humility off it. On the field, he was the spitting image of the Texas A&M Manziel, throwing BBs and running when he wanted.

Not too much finality after a first preseason game, right Peter? Except Mike Pettine wants to make a decision prior to the third preseason game and you wrote at length about how Manziel outplaying Hoyer against the Lions in the preseason game Kevin Durant was referring to helped close the gap between the two quarterbacks. "No finality in that first preseason game," says Peter King, as he discusses how Manziel now has a shot to start for the Browns in Week 1 because of his performance in the first preseason game.

2. I think these three things struck me about the Washington-New England joint practices last week:

Crowds of more than 20,000 two days in a row? In Richmond, Va.? That’s the power of the NFL, and of Tom Brady and Bill Belichick and the Washington brand in Virginia. Startling still, though.

I know! It's not like there are a ton of Redskins fans in Virginia or anything like that. But in Richmond, Virginia? That's a tiny town of 214,000 people with 1.2 million in the metropolitan area of Richmond. It's amazing the fans made the really long 100 mile (approximately) journey from Washington, D.C. to see these two teams have two joint practices in such a little country town. It doesn't take much to startle Peter King I guess.

Then Peter uses the words of Don Banks to show just how amazingly popular these joint practices were. It's almost like football is a really popular sport or something. It's also almost like Tom Brady and the Patriots are a popular team to watch play football. Who would have thought this to be true?

3. I think you could have knocked me over with a feather when I heard the Scott Mitchell news the other day. NBC announced that the former Dan Marino backup and free-agent millionaire (five years, $25 million) Detroit quarterback Scott Mitchell will be a contestant on “The Biggest Loser” show.

Peter was all like, when he heard the news that Scott Mitchell was obese now. If somebody had a feather, granted a feather that was really, really large, it would have knocked Peter over.

Mitchell is 6-foot-6. He weighed 238 pounds as a player. He weighs 366 now. That’s a 128-pound inflation. Twenty years ago this season, Mitchell signed a five-year, $25-million contract with the Lions. I covered his free-agent search for Sports Illustrated, and I remember he was the hot guy in free agency that year.

Matt Flynn was the hot guy in free agency. Matt Cassel was traded for a second round pick. There is no correlation between a quarterback being widely wanted and this quarterback not becoming obese later in his life.

Then he threw a two-point conversion pass to Moore to tie. Marino came right back and led a winning field goal drive. The final: Miami 33, Detroit 30. I mean, for a while, Scott Mitchell was a player. Thus the triple-take when you hear, “Scott Mitchell weighs 366 and will be on ‘The Biggest Loser’ this season.”

I don't understand at all. So because Scott Mitchell was a good quarterback in the NFL for a while this means it is more shocking that he gained weight after his playing career was over? So quarterbacks who are bad in the NFL should be gaining more weight in retirement than quarterbacks who are successful in the NFL? I was surprised Scott Mitchell weighed 366 pounds just because I had not heard his name in a while, but at no point did I think, "He was good at football for an hour or two, how did he gain so much weight?"

4. I think it’s early (about three months early) to start talking about 2015 head-coaching candidates,

Which means Peter is going to immediately start talking about 2015 head-coaching candidates. That's how these things work.

but I hope Kansas City special-teams coordinator Dave Toub gets a legitimate chance next year. You never know if a special-teams guy can follow in John Harbaugh’s footsteps, but Toub’s such an impressive coach and person. 

Since it's too early to start talking about 2015 head-coaching candidates, then it's too early for my snark about Peter recommending another white guy to be a "legitimate" head-coaching candidate when I know he will at some point write his yearly MMQB section about how the NFL wants to focus on minority candidates that are qualified to be NFL head coaches. I've noticed that for someone who thinks the NFL needs to do more to get minority candidates head coaching jobs, Peter recommends a lot of white guys as future head-coaching candidates. Just an observation.

9. I think I won’t be shocked if the Patriots cut Ryan Mallett … or get a seventh-round pick for him from someone.

But Peter, haven't you read the Twitter where some sportswriters were talking up Mallett and how he's looked pretty good like it's their job to do so?

10. I think these are my non-football thoughts of the week:

b. Get to know Indians pitcher Corey Kluber.

You get to know Corey Kluber. Simply because you recently discovered how well he is pitching doesn't mean everyone else was as far behind as you are.

g. Coffeenerdness: Raise your coffee game, Marriott Towne Place Suites.

Quit bitching about free coffee, Peter King. If you want good coffee, go buy some good coffee.

i. Went to my first funeral with full military honors, for my uncle, Andy Keir, an Army veteran, in Enfield, Conn., last week. Hadn’t heard the Star-Spangled Banner in a church before, and had never seen the flag being handed to the widow, and had never heard graveside taps at a funeral. I have to say, I loved it all.

It's so lovely when veterans die! What an entertaining ceremony their funeral can be!

j. A note on the discourse in this country, and on social media, in the wake of my Cam Newton column last week. I accept the fact that some people won’t agree with what I write, or find ulterior motives about why I wrote about an olive branch Newton offered to me. But can we disagree and be critical without telling me to go bleep myself 19 different ways?

Raise your Twitter game, human beings.

The Adieu Haiku

Strongest candidate
to lose QB job pre-Sept?
Money’s on Matt Schaub.


Uh-oh, is Matt Schaub the new Josh Freeman? We'll see, but you know I will stay on the case. Schaub is earning almost four times what Josh Freeman earned to sit the Vikings bench too, so based on that, Peter would have to bash Schaub three or four times for every time he bashed Freeman for being a waste of a human being/football player. Raise your quarterbacking game, Matt Schaub.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

6 comments MMQB Review: Matthew Stafford is So Different Now, Except for He Probably Isn't

Peter King told us last week the Colts had a little Luck (DO YOU STILL GET IT?) in beating the Broncos during Week 7. Peter also was concerned the Rams would not get enough attention because the Cardinals had a home game in the World Series, as well as continued his trend towards overreacting to what happened the weekend before by handing the AFC West to the Kansas City Chiefs and giving the Broncos an AFC Wild Card spot. Peter can hear us scoffing at him now, but less than 50% of the season had been played at that point, so the playoff seeding is nearly set. This week Peter talks about Matthew Stafford "coming of age" (which means, "Calvin Johnson had a great receiving day"...sort of), goes through the comments section of MMQB for responses to the MMQB (not the MMQB, but THE MMQB) articles about concussions, and relays a story from Robert Klemko about really weird Japanese people. Peter also continues his trend of seeing what happened over the past weekend and then reacting as if this event from the past weekend is a definite long-term trend.

Two months down, two to go. Time flies when you’re having fun. The Lions had some fun Sunday, and the resurgent Staffords will lead the column …

So I guess since the Lions won a game this past weekend over Dallas this means the Bears and Packers going to be fighting for a Wild Card spot after the Lions win the NFC North division.

but some headlines first:

Absolutely not. Let's talk about how Stafford is a great quarterback now based on the fact he made a really heads-up play at the end of the game on Sunday, had as many turnovers as touchdowns and threw for 488 yards with 329 of those yards going to one receiver.

Mike Pouncey might want to get lawyered up. As Pete Thamel and Greg A. Bedard reported Sunday night, the Massachusetts state police served the Miami Dolphins center with a Grand Jury subpoena after his game in Foxboro Sunday. “What’s this about?’’ Pouncey said when a gray-suited officer handed him the papers. It created a strange scene outside the Dolphins’ locker room at Gillette Stadium, with stunned team officials totally blindsided. Pouncey, too, evidently had no idea what was coming.

I think it would be fair to say the officer "pounced" on him, no?

Just like Clark Griswold’s Jelly of the Month Club present, the Kansas City quarterback brought more joy to two fan bases Sunday. In lifting the Chiefs to a 23-17 victory over Cleveland at home, Smith continued KC’s perfect (8-0) season.

Alex Smith continued the Chiefs perfect season by holding the Browns to 340 total yards and accumulating a massive 331 yards for the Chiefs offense. He's a winning winner who only wins. He's an efficient quarterback, as seen by his completion percentage of 59.1% which is good for 24th in the NFL, his yards per attempt of 6.28 which is good for 29th in the NFL, his quarterback rating of 82.1 which is good for 18th in the NFL, and his yards per game passing of 224 which is good for 23rd in the NFL. Smith has done all of this against such difficult teams like the Jags, Texans, Eagles, Giants, Titans, Raiders and Browns. Smith has been his usual average self against some really below-average competition, so kudos to him.

If you can't see through all that sarcasm, I think the Chiefs are a paper tiger. I had them at 9 wins before the season began and I think I was wrong about that number, but playing Denver and San Diego twice, along with a game against the Colts is going to tell me how good the Chiefs really are. Hey, I could be wrong and the Chiefs are one of the two best teams in the AFC, but I think the second half of the season isn't going to be as kind to Alex Smith and the Chiefs.

The original trade was Smith for a second-round pick in 2013 and a third-rounder in 2014 … but the third- in ’14 would become a second- if the Chiefs won eight games or more this season. That happened by mid-afternoon Sunday, as the Niners were trudging off the field at Wembley Stadium in London after whipping Jacksonville 42-10. As if San Francisco draft guru Trent Baalke needed more ammo, he now could be looking at six picks in the first three rounds next May:

Take that, Gregg Easterbrook, Mr. "The 49ers should have kept Alex Smith." As Alex Smith wins game for the Chiefs he helps the 49ers get a higher draft pick.

This just in: Calvin Johnson’s good. He had a nice month in three hours Sunday at Ford Field in Detroit’s 31-30 shocker of Dallas: 14 catches, 329 yards (seven short of the all-time single-game record), one touchdown.

I would love to know what kind of quarterback Matthew Stafford would be if he didn't have Calvin Johnson out there catching the ball for him. I know it's not fair to wonder that since Stafford does have Johnson and if you took any quarterback's best receiver away he wouldn't play as well, but so much of Stafford's success lies in having Johnson out there. Stafford's worst games of the season were when Johnson wasn't healthy. I probably have no point.

Remember the good ol’ days? Way back in the first half of the first game of the season, when the Chip Kelly offense was all the rage?

No Peter, but I remember all summer when you were up Chip Kelly's ass about how he ran his practices and talked about how the Eagles are doing things SO MUCH differently than every other NFL coach does things. I remember when you said the Chip Kelly hiring was the biggest hiring from the college ranks since Jimmy Johnson. I also remember when I stupidly bought into the crap you and your fellow sportswriters were peddling and predicted the Eagles would win the NFC East.

There’s some thought that because there is no “home” team in England, and selling a bad Jacksonville team (the Jags will play a game there in 2014, ’15 and ’16 at least) will be problematic right now, a good option is every team alternating. Of course, that won’t be a good option the minute you tell a Packers, Steelers, Broncos or Seahawks fan he  or she has to lose a home game for the sake of expansionism.

Actually that won't be a good option for the fans of any NFL team who loses a home game for the sake of expansionism. I'll be damned if I want my favorite team to have seven home games because Roger Goodell insists on expanding to London.

But as one league operative told me recently: “If you guys [NBC, where I also work] can get 850,000 viewers for a Manchester United game on NBC Sports Network, why can’t we build a block of fans like that for football over there?”

Fine, build a block of fans in England, but don't take away home games to build that block. That's like if Manchester United lost a home soccer match and played here in the United States every year. Fuck that. The NFL can do whatever it wants to build a fan base in England, that's great, but NFL fans are already getting ripped off for two shitty preseason games, so they don't deserve to lose another home game for the sake of the NFL trying to expand. Show the games in England to build a fan base, don't take away home games from NFL teams. I know my opinion is probably in the minority.

Greg Jennings in the Revenge Game: One catch, nine yards, left the locker room before the media arrived following Green Bay’s 44-31 win at Minnesota last night. That’s 264 yards fewer than teammate Cordarrelle Patterson put on the board.

Poor Greg Jennings. It's so hard to be a great receiver when your quarterbacks all suck. Perhaps next time before Jennings runs his mouth about Aaron Rodgers he should find out if any of the quarterbacks on his Vikings team are any good or not.

I wrote last year about the possibility of a quarterback, in the not-too-distant future, throwing for 6,000 yards in a season. Aaron Rodgers, I theorized, would have the best shot. I’m not saying Peyton Manning’s going to do it this year, but let’s acknowledge the greatness of the first-half MVP here. In Denver’s 7-1 start,

It's a shame the Broncos are going to be getting a wild card in the AFC after starting out 7-1. At least Peter had the Broncos getting a wild card and the Chiefs winning the AFC West last week, perhaps Peter seen something shiny this week and has changed his opinion on this in the seven whole days since he last wrote MMQB. I'm sure as soon as the Chiefs lose, Peter will put the Broncos right back on top of the AFC West. 

But let’s say he adds one medium-range skinny post per game in the final eight games. Say, an extra gain of 20 per game. If Manning averages 385 yards per game in his final eight, he’ll hit 6,000.

Of course Peter is ignoring the fact Manning could already be throwing for his peak amount of yardage right now. In other words, his current passing yards per game may be Manning's ceiling for yardage in a game, but that doesn't stop Peter from theorizing how Manning could break 6,000 yards...but who’d have ever thought throwing for 6,000 would be remotely possible so soon after 5,000 started getting hit?

(Peter King in early May) "Right now, Chris Davis is averaging a home run every third game. But let's say Chris Davis starts hitting a home run every game. That's almost 100 home runs for the season. Who would have thought a player could hit 100 home runs in a season?"

Matthew Stafford’s coming-of-age moment.

“SPIKE! SPIKE! SPIKE!”

We’ll get to that.

This is the second time Peter has said he would get to this. How about he just gets to it and stops the long preamble?

Certainly, this was not Stafford’s first big comeback. This was his 10th fourth-quarter comeback. But this one just felt different to me. Something about the high-tension accuracy and the big-boy decision he made with the game ticking away.

What felt different to Peter is this comeback happened just this past weekend and Peter has started to overreact to the NFL games that just occurred, so the immediacy of the comeback makes it feel different to Peter. Sure, Stafford came back from more points down on the road against the Cowboys a few years ago, but this comeback just happened! It's just so different!

Now :21, :20 … Stafford motioning to the offense to hustle up the field. “I was looking back, yelling for [left tackle] Riley Reiff to hurry up,’’ Stafford said … :19, :18 … Now motioning madly for Reiff to get in place, while also yelling “SPIKE” and giving the universal “spike’’ signal, the hand gesturing hard to the ground, over and over … Reiff in place, at :16.

“So I’m on the line, and everyone in the stadium thinks I’m spiking it, and that was the plan,’’ Stafford said. “The other 10 guys [on offense] thought I was too. I thought I was—but then I saw a couple of their guys, almost standing up, and I just had this thought: Maybe I could make it by sneaking, or just putting the ball over the line. Maybe that was our best chance.’’

Plus, Stafford didn't have enough room to just throw the ball up in the air to Calvin Johnson as he prefers to do, so he had to try something different.

But no timeouts left. Clock running. If Stafford failed, there was a chance he wouldn’t get another play off.

I believe Peter is being overdramatic here. If Stafford failed then he and his linemen could have gotten up and possibly spiked the football. It's not like they had run anywhere, they just had to get up, get the ball re-placed and then spike it. Maybe not, but "there was a chance" Stafford wouldn't get another play off. There's also a chance the Lions could have gotten another play off. Naturally, Peter chooses the more dramatic of the options.

So why? Why do it? Why not the fade to Johnson, who could win a jump ball against most of the Dallas defenders—shoot, against all of them? If it’s incomplete, another fade, or a rollout pass.

Because Stafford has matured, Peter. He's like completely mature now.

“You just feel it,’’ he said. “Hard to explain. You just go to the line and you feel it sometimes, and I just felt: Our best chance is me taking to the ball and diving it over. I mean, all we were was three inches from the end zone.”

Snap … :14 … Stafford takes the ball, grips it as tight as he can, and with much of the defensive line looking on impassively, he thrusts the ball clearly over the line and brings it back. Touchdown.

This was a great play, but the Lions had just run a play that ended near the goal line with 26 seconds left in the game. The Lions offensive linemen ran 22 yards in that time, got the ball set, and ran a play in 12 seconds. It's completely possible, and probably very likely, if Stafford's attempt to score failed the Lions would get another play off in the approximate 10 seconds left in the game. So Stafford's play was very smart, but also not quite the risk that Peter is so much wanting to make it out to be. Peter loves a little drama though.

I know how sportswriters love their narratives and love to see a group of events turn into a story, so "Matthew Stafford has matured" is the likely narrative to come out of this game. More likely nothing has changed and Stafford had a big game because Calvin Johnson had a fantastic game, while Stafford happened to also make a smart play to win the game for the Lions. I still think the comeback against the Cowboys on the road a couple of years ago was the better Stafford comeback. Of course, immediacy usually wins, so this Cowboys-Lions game had to have been a turning point for Stafford in his career.

In the past week, we at The MMQB have tried to take the head-trauma debate deeper, with 19 stories exploring ideas about a safer game, the realities of playing a violent game, and the complicated issues facing youth and high-school football today.

My takeaways from the series: It surprises me that parents—and we interviewed 23 of them who spoke this way—cede the decision to play or not play high-school football to their sons.

That has changed in the time since I was a (quite marginal) high-school athlete in Enfield, Conn. If my father and mother thought the sport I was playing was excessively dangerous, they’d have interceded and recommended and/or demanded I not play.

PETER'S PARENTS CARED ABOUT HIM MORE THAN PARENTS TODAY CARE ABOUT THEIR CHILDREN!

I understand wanting to empower your children, but I’m not sure empowering 15- and 16-year-olds who make decisions based very often on emotion is a smart call …

Because it appears the alternative is to intercede and run the risk of your child growing up to be a oft-pretentious sportswriter who expects no human being at any point to interfere with his perfect existence on the planet and feels the need to comment when he perceives someone isn't acting in the proper fashion while on a plane, train, or automobile.

Now for some reactions to the writing we did.

From the comments sections...

Getting reactions from people in the comment section from a widely read sports article is perhaps one of the most useless and futile exercises to get constructive feedback that a sportswriter could participate in, but here we go anyway...

From “branlishan:” “There is a non-stop assault on football by SI and its writers. We get it now. Football is dangerous. If football is such a barbaric sport then why do you cover the games and bring attention to the glory of it all? SI should stop with the hypocritical garbage. Either line up behind the ‘ban football’ crowd and stop covering a sport that is so dangerous, or shut up. Because this non-stop assault never ends.’’

I hate it when sportswriters provide a non-stop assault of facts they have discovered when investigating a topic. Stop with the facts and give me more filler!

From “decredico,” to me: “You sat on this story for years and under reported it and you are part of the package that kept this off the radar for many years. You are a disingenuous hypocrite that should be excoriated and excommunicated and banished to writing for the local garden section of a small town newspaper.’’

This is why you ignore the comments section. I write about Peter King every week, but come on, it's not his job nor is he qualified to do research on concussions and then report on it in-depth. Peter could do the reporting, but the story hasn't been researched for years, so there is no way Peter "sat" on the story. People are idiots.

From “hlmencken56:” “We’re just a country full of cowards now. Everyone is a victim, and nobody should ever get hurt, or the risks always must be lowered.”

This isn't constructive nor instructive. Clearly, this idiot has never played football nor dealt with a loved one that has a traumatic brain injury.

Now for emails THE MMQB received on the topic of concussions...

“I have been a fan of you and your MMQB column for seven or eight years now and never miss one. I was really looking forward to your new MMQB page and for the most part I have really enjoyed it. However lately I have not nearly enjoyed MMQB as much. I feel like I have been given a concussion by being beaten over the head with your concussion reports. Please go back to the reporting of fun football.

Yes, don't let reality infringe on the fun part of watching football. Ignore the negative, report the positive. Stick your head in the sand and ignore the problems. Brilliant, brilliant line of thought.

You don’t have to ignore concussions completely, but man I feel like you guys are trying to ruin something that I enjoy so very much.

It sounds like someone doesn't enjoy hearing about the physical problems his "fun" sport causes on the NFL players that makes the sport not-so-much fun after a player has retired.

It’s like if every time I eat something bad for me, my wife is standing behind me telling me that it’s going to kill me.”

 —Brock

Well maybe it will kill you and you shouldn't eat it then. Why do I have the feeling Brock weighs about 400 pounds or has had multiple heart attacks, but refuses to change his eating habits? Clearly, he wants to stay in denial until he needs help, in which case he obviously wants someone to help him so he can get back to having "fun."

I'm getting way off topic, but Brock either needs to read and learn from the MMQB reports about concussions or ignore them entirely if he doesn't like the reality of what these reports say to him.

“As a parent with a 9-year old and 14-year old playing football, and as a coach and huge football fan, I think the real problem here is all the negative publicity that is causing unnecessary concern and alarm. I do believe that efforts must continue to be made through better equipment, medical supervision and education. However the media needs to stop talking about it. Parents should be talking about it, players should be talking about it, coaches should be talking about it, medical professionals need to be talking about it but the media needs to leave it alone!! If that happens, both the safety and future of the game will be protected!’’
—Kris, Abbotsford, British Columbia

So the media needs to quit talking about concussions and let parents, coaches, medical professionals, and players talk about concussions using the information provided by...who? Generally, if the media doesn't disseminate information about a topic it's not that easy to be provided information on that topic. If I'm a parent who wants to get information on concussions to decide whether to allow my child to play football or not, should I just starting calling medical professionals or go to youth league games to talk to random parents about concussions? This just seems nonsensical to say, "Hey, we should be talking about concussions, but not the sports media. The sports media should ignore concussions."

Fine Fifteen

Yep, still in seemingly random order and still too reliant upon what happened just this past week. 

1. Kansas City (8-0). I debated putting the Chiefs here, after they struggled to beat Houston and Cleveland at home in the last eight days while others up top—the Niners in particular—have been strafing the league mercilessly.

But the Chiefs are undefeated. How can you pull an undefeated team from the top spot? Were the Chiefs impressive in not having lost any games just a week ago, but now they are unimpressive in winning games and that all of a sudden matters?

There are no style points in football, though, and the Chiefs are undefeated halfway through the season.

There are no style points?

3. San Francisco (6-2). Five straight wins by an average of 22.6 points. This team’s getting scary. 

Peter says there are no style points, yet he places the 49ers above three one-win teams and quotes by how many points the 49ers have won their last five games. There are no style points, unless there are style points.

4. Denver (7-1). Why San Francisco over the Broncos? Because I trust the Niners defense right now. I don’t trust Denver’s nearly as much.

Plus, style points. Of course Denver's only loss came to the team that is #2 in Peter's Fine Fifteen, while the 49ers have lost to the #2 and #5 teams in Peter's Fine Fifteen. But of course, there's no style points yet Peter puts the 49ers above a team that has one fewer loss and beat the 49ers head-to-head.

9. New England (6-2). So flawed. So hard to read. So hard to think this is an impact team in January—but the defense, even without Wilfork/Mayo/Talib, is a competitive group with players like Logan Ryan who don’t know they’re not supposed to be making game-deciding plays.

When a sportswriter lacks the ability to quantify why a team is playing well, he/she just writes crap like saying a team has players "who don't know they aren't supposed to be making game-deciding plays," as if this really means anything.

10. Detroit (5-3). One premier team with one premier quarterback (Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers) left in the final eight games—unless you count Baltimore, which, right now, you can’t call a premier team. That’s why I like the Lions’ chances to be the NFC North champ or the sixth seed in the NFC tournament.

See? The Lions win an exciting game against a 4-4 team and all of a sudden Peter King thinks the Lions could win the NFC North. I'm guessing if the Lions won another exciting game then Peter will have the Lions in the Super Bowl, as long as another new, shiny team doesn't win an exciting game during Week 9 of course.

11. Carolina (4-3). You can talk about the maturation and improvement of Cam Newton, which is good and true. But this is a pretty stingy team. Panthers have allowed 12 per game in the last five.

They have beaten the Giants, Vikings, Buccaneers, and Rams. What do they all have in common? They are all not very good teams. A 4-3 record against crappy opponents sure must be impressive to Peter for Carolina to be #11 in his "Fine Fifteen."

15. Houston (2-5).

Call me crazy as I rank the Texans over Arizona, Tennessee and Baltimore (which owns a 21-point win over Houston). I say Case Keenum and that defense constitute a playoff threat still … even though Indy (twice) and Denver (once) remain to be played.

Peter thinks the Texans are a playoff threat, but as the seventh best team in the AFC at this current time he doesn't think the Texans will actually make the playoffs of course. Also, I'm not calling him crazy, but merely saying Peter is probably overly-excited about the Texans winning more games so Peter can write about J.J. Watt more.

Special Teams Player of the Week

Josh Brown, kicker, New York Giants. Not a great fan of the field goal per se (see Stat of the Week), but in the first 55 minutes at Philadelphia, these were the only points: Brown, 40-yard field goal; Brown, 44-yard field goal; Brown, 33-yard field goal; Brown, 46-yard field goal; Brown, 27-yard field goal.

Only Peter King would name a kicker the special teams player of the week in the same MMQB where he essentially says that field goals are becoming too easy for kickers to make. I guess he believes field goals are too easy to make, but not too easy for a field goal kicker who makes five field goals to impress Peter.

Goat of the Week

Shaun Suisham, kicker, Pittsburgh. Kickers this season are making 94 percent of their kicks from inside the 40-yard line. Suisham missed 34- and 32-yard field goals, veritable extra points in today’s games. The Steelers lost by three. Pretty easy call.

Because field goals are so easy to convert and kickers never have a bad day.

“You have to understand the beast that’s playing quarterback. Once a guy like that gets in front of the whole defense, he’s a legit 4.4. It’s real.”

—Pittsburgh safety Ryan Clark, after Oakland quarterback Terrelle Pryor ran for the longest touchdown in Oakland franchise history, 93 yards, in a 21-18 Raiders victory Sunday.

So now the Raiders just have to figure out a way to get Terrelle Pryor in front of the whole opposing defense and the Raiders offense will be unstoppable.

At some point, the NFL’s going to have to acknowledge the efficiency of field-goal kickers is just too good. And the league is either going to have to narrow the goalposts or put a different point value on field goals from different distances.

Don't you hate it when NFL kickers become too good at their jobs? Once a player gets too good, it's time to move the goal posts (literally and figuratively it seems).

This easy, as the season nears the midpoint:

From inside the 40-yard line: 230 of 245, 93.9%. From between the 40- and 49-yard line: 126 of 153, 82.4%.

Do we want the game to be so boring, to lack any suspense, when a kicker steps up to make a field goal?

Maybe Graham Gano just sucks, but I don't really think a field goal is a given when a kicker steps back to attempt one. I guess the percentages say a field goal is a pretty good bet when a kicker lines up for one, but I still don't feel like it is a given personally.

I can tell you the founding fathers

Yeah, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin would be pissed about the current state of field goal kicking in the NFL.

of this game never dreamed the kickers would be so great that they would be good on 87 percent of their field goals through nearly half a season.

Oh nevermind, the founding fathers of "this game" not of "this country."

I would imagine the founding fathers of football also didn't dream of a forward pass and quarterbacks putting up 500 yards passing in a game. I'm not disagreeing with Peter, just saying any change to the vision of the founding fathers isn't necessarily a bad change for the game of football.

Then Peter King remarks at how young Marcus Mariota is and says he wouldn't be able to legally drink a beer if he won an NFL game next year. Peter previously provided data showing how young Mariota is compared to other 2014 draft-eligible quarterbacks.

Mr. Starwood Preferred Member Travel Note of the Week

The MMQB’s Robert Klemko had to fly from Chicago to Detroit Sunday morning to cover Lions-Cowboys, and he reported this to me when he landed:

Apparently there is an edict sent out by Peter King that all THE MMQB staff members must report annoying travel-related details to him immediately.

“I get on this plane from Chicago to Detroit, and these Japanese people, five of them, boarded the plane all carrying different stuffed animals. A teddy bear in an Army uniform, another teddy bear in a pilot uniform. I’d say they were in their late 20s, early 30s. One of them was a guy, and his bear was dressed in an American desert camo uniform.

“They were clutching these animals as if they were children. So I am sitting amidst them. The flight is taking off, and they’re not panicked or anything—but they’re whispering things in Japanese to the bears as if they were children. Then they just held them for the rest of the flight.

Wait, so these five Japanese people held on the teddy bears and whispered things in Japanese ALL WHILE MINDING THEIR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS? It doesn't get much worse than that. How can anyone be expected to stare at random strangers and micro-criticize their behavior when there is such an obvious distraction right there in front of his/her face? I'm sure there was a man on the plane who blatantly chose to watch the same television show on repeat for the entire flight and Robert Klemko didn't get to comment on this guy's behavior because these five Japanese people were minding their own business and doing something Klemko considers to be weird.

“I mean, they were holding them like they were breathing, like they were babies. Maybe they want kids and they are practicing for it. I don’t know. But there is something strange going on there.”

Perhaps THE MMQB should do a full investigation and report back in MMQB next week. I would imagine if these Japanese people wanted children they wouldn't have teddy bears as replacement children, but I know it merits a mention in MMQB as opposed to any sort of in-depth research on this topic that could be done online.

“I miss holding a baby – all my little guys are old.”
—@BarrySanders.

Yes, that Barry Sanders.

I guess Peter looked to find the most bland Tweet of the Week to include in MMQB. I would hope it is "that" Barry Sanders, because otherwise I could care even less that some random dude named Barry Sanders misses holding a child.

Ten Things I Think I Think

1. I think this is what I liked about Week 8:

d. Take those trade rumors and stuff ‘em, Josh Gordon says with his play every week.

Actually every week Josh Gordon probably says, "I'm a very good wide receiver and a contending NFL team should definitely trade for me immediately" with his excellent play.

f. Thad Lewis, who is very tough.

Thad Lewis is tough. This is #analysis.

g. Look at that lunging touchdown catch by Dexter McCluster. What a talent he is, and he’s being used perfectly as an everything back by Andy Reid.

Dexter McCluster has been targeted in the passing game 40 times over 8 games and has caught 23 passes. McCluster has 5 rushing attempts for 10 yards. If Peter King says McCluster is being used perfectly, meaning a little over six times per game, then that's not exactly a compliment to McCluster's ability.

Come on, Peter says "what a talent McCluster is" and then says he is being used perfectly. The guy barely catches 50% of the passes thrown to him and has 263 offensive yards on the year. If I'm being generous and including his punt and kickoff returns McCluster has 653 total yards and two touchdowns on the season. He's a good punt returner, but he's not exactly the offensive talent that Peter King seems to think he is.

h. Kevin Ogletree, who ran 70 yards to chase down Sean Lee on the Cowboys.

Or as Gregg Easterbrook will say, "the undrafted, unwanted hard-working Kevin Ogletree chased down the highly-drafted glory boy second-round pick Sean Lee."

2. I think this is what I didn’t like about Week 8:

d. Garrett Hartley, doinking a makeable field goal on the Saints’ first drive.

I guess from now on anytime a field goal kicker misses a field goal from 40 yards or less then Peter King will call that field goal "makeable" and criticize the kicker for missing it. Great, there's no way I could be less enthused about this new development.

e. The normally accurate Alex Smith, overthrowing a wide-open Anthony Fasano in the end zone, forcing Kansas City to settle for a field goal in the first quarter against Cleveland.

24th in the NFL in completion percentage. I guess that's "normally accurate."

a. Tom Brady, throwing behind Rob Gronkowski and getting picked by cornerback Dimitri Patterson (a very good Jeff Ireland offseason pickup), leading to Miami’s first touchdown. 

f. Geez, Tom Brady: It’s so bad you’re throwing to Rob Gronkowski in triple coverage? The good side: Officials gave the Patriots a gift defensive pass interference call on the play.

Peter King does not like it when Tom Brady passes the football to Rob Gronkowski.

j. Why, oh why, Chip Kelly, when you’re one score behind with four minutes to go, your defense playing well and three timeouts left do you onside kick?

Because fortune favors the bold! Because Chip Kelly was inspiring the Eagles to win by saying he was trying to win the game with an onside kick. You know Gregg Easterbrook is going to leave out Chip Kelly's bold move to go for an onside kick from his TMQ, even though Gregg has said a surprise onside kick is a good idea and plays like this tell a team the coach is playing to win the game. If Gregg does mention that Kelly went for an onside kick, I'm sure he'll suggest the kicker should have done a little dance before kicking the ball to throw the defense off.

6. I think for a fully healthy Peterson to have 36 carries in the last three weeks, with Minnesota struggling so much at quarterback, is absurd.

Yeah, but Josh Freeman and Christian Ponder need to be able to sling the ball around the field a little don't you know?

7. I think there are so many teams that could use Cleveland wideout Josh Gordon, so many receiver-needy contenders,

BREAKING NEWS: Many NFL teams could use a talented wide receiver on their roster.

I realize Gordon could be a positive substance test away from a lengthy suspension, but if I’m the Patriots, and I still have my full load of 2014 picks, I’d offer Cleveland a fourth-round pick that could conditionally upgrade to a third- depending on performance and try to get Gordon.

Josh Gordon is signed through 2014 and is very cheap. I'm sure the Browns would be more than willing to trade Josh Gordon for a 3rd/4th round draft pick. It's not like the Browns got a 1st round pick for Trent Richardson or anything, so I'm sure they would accept a lesser pick for a more talented player who is cheaper.

8. I think the Eagles have to be the disappointment of the season. The offense in particular.

I guess the Eagles are a disappointment depending on how much exactly was expected of them based entirely on Chip Kelly being the head coach.

A Chip Kelly team first and foremost has to have consistency and efficiency at quarterback, and Philadelphia hasn’t had that all season.

Nearly every NFL team needs consistency and efficiency at the quarterback position to succeed. The Eagles and Chip Kelly's offense aren't the only ones who need this.

10. I think these are my non-football thoughts of the week:

b. Memo to Darren Rovell (said with slight annoyance): The Riddell helmet/NFL divorce you wrote about, a story that was written by Jenny Vrentas of The MMQB on TheMMQB.com last Tuesday, was not written on SI.com, as you reported. It’s The MMQB.

Memo to Peter King (with a know-it-all attitude): This is what happens when you name your site THE MMQB and write a column called MMQB that used to appear on CNNSI.com. If you wanted to brand your new website in the best possible way, brand it to avoid confusion and not in a way that reminds the uninformed that there used to be a column posted on CNNSI.com that is called the exact same thing as your new website. Sure, I don't like Darren Rovell and he should have known this, but these are the things that happen when you confuse readers with the name of your new website that also happens to be the same name of a column you write for the new website that also appears on CNNSI.com.

c. Nothing against SI.com; I love SI.com. This column runs on SI.com at well as The MMQB. But the story was not written on SI.com.

And oh yeah, don't be upset when a person doesn't know exactly which site something posted on THE MMQB comes from when it is posted on CNNSI.com also. As I write this, the front page of CNNSI.com shows this very MMQB column and the link for THE MMQB has SI.com in the url. So, it's not hard to see where confusion can happen.

d. Thanks, Florence and the Machine, for “Shake It Out.” That’s my song of the week.

I'm sure they wrote the song just for you.

h. The obstruction call (he said through gritted teeth), though a stupid rule because umpires cannot use interpretation, was called correctly to end Game 3.

I know Red Sox fans will kill me for saying this, but even if the umpires could use interpretation I could see an argument that Middlebrooks meant to trip Allen Craig. If you watch the replay then you notice as he falls to the ground trying to catch the errant throw Middlebrooks' legs go up in the air. Then he lowers his legs and raises them again as Craig tries to run over him. Since Middlebrooks legs actually came back in the air after they were on the ground and just happened to be raised again as Allen Craig tried to run in the baseline, I could see where umpires could interpret intent to trip Allen Craig. Upon seeing the replay a few times, it seemed odd to me that Middlebrooks' legs went down on the ground and then happened to raise back up when Craig tried to run in the baseline over him.

j. Quote of the Series, from Jonny Gomes to Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times, concerning the fact that he was only in the lineup Sunday night because Shane Victorino’s back tightened up and forced him to the bench, giving Gomes the chance to hit the game-winning three-run home run: “I had to ‘Tonya Harding’ Victorino.”

k. Google or Bing “Tonya Harding” if that one slips past you.

Sure, just as soon as you Google or Bing "Wally Pipp." 

n. Beernerdness: Also had the good fortune to be at Game 2 of the Series on Thursday, and was nearly as lucky to be back in my favorite old neighborhood restaurant Picco, in Boston’s South End. Very good beer menu. Tried the Star Island Single, a Belgian ale from Smuttynose in New Hampshire, and it was almost like a light ale. Okay, and eminently drinkable, but not memorable.

This wasn't a memorable beer, yet Peter remembers the name of the beer, who made the beer, what kind of beer it tasted like and also remembers enough of the taste to give a review on whether he liked the beer or not.

Who I Like Tonight
 
Seattle 33, St. Louis 10. Bet you thought I’d say, “Boston 4, St. Louis 3,” didn’t you?

Nope, I didn't.

I'm not including the Adieu Haiku, because it is a haiku and a bad joke. It's a reference to the "illegal bat" call in the Patriots-Dolphins game. Fine, here it is.

I have always thought
the home for illegal bats
was in the belfry.


I bet you feel dumber having read that.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

10 comments Skip Bayless Suggests the NFL Gets Rid of Field Goals, I Suggest We Allow NFL Kickers to Use Skip Bayless as a Football

Skip Bayless is a pretty useless human being. I'm sure he has positive qualities in his own personal life and tells many humorous jokes. He is well-known for being a fitness buff and isn't exactly afraid to show that off. This tells me he is probably somewhat insecure, which would help explain his daily pleas for attention on "First Take" and his love for Tim Tebow. He probably imagines a Tim Tebow-Skip Bayless petroleum jelly wrestling contest in his dreams. Regardless, Skip is a #1 troll and the bane of the world's existence. He craves attention and ESPN gives him a forum to get said attention. I have less respect for him than pretty much any other writer I cover here. In fact, I have such little respect for him I don't cover him here because I consider anything he writes to be pure trolling bullshit. I decided to make an exception today. Skip wants to get rid of the field goal attempt and extra point attempt in the NFL. Why? Who knows, but he probably is just saying stupid shit to be controversial and get the attention he so desperately craves.

Skip was very afraid the Super Bowl would come down to a field goal attempt. The Super Bowl did not come down to a field goal attempt, but I'm sure he is still proud of his trolling abilities.

This shapes up to be the hardest-hitting Super Bowl ever. Here come two teams who pride themselves on imposing steel wills on foes. So it's all-too-possible gifted warriors will battle their guts out for nearly 60 minutes … only to watch a player who doesn't actually play football trot onto the field and decide the outcome.

I think Skip is confusing the Super Bowl with the Dr. Pepper halftime special that takes place during BCS bowl games where contestants try to win scholarship money. The only ones deciding the Super Bowl will be players on the Ravens and 49ers roster.

Yes, the favored San Francisco 49ers' most important player very well could be kicker David Akers, whose psyche now resembles Cajun gumbo.
And Ray Lewis' nearly legendary "Last Ride" could ride on the mental toughness of an undrafted rookie kicker named Justin Tucker.
 
This, NFL fans, is lunacy.

No, it is not. It is the rules. I never realized there was a certain draft position or salary requirement for a player to be able to decide the Super Bowl.

This has been a career-long pet peeve of mine. Why do we blindly accept that the great game of football is often decided by a goofily gimmicky kick between two poles?

Because these are the rules of football.

These kicks count three points? They're attempted by one of the lowest paid members of the team?

These kicks count for three points just like a free throw in basketball counts for one point. Also, salary has nothing to do with the impact a player has a football game.

Even more also, David Akers is the 14th highest paid player on the 49ers team. The following players make less than Akers:

Colin Kaepernick
Aldon Smith
Mike Iupati
Randy Moss
Joe Staley
Tarell Brown
Navorro Bowman
Chris Culliver

So Skip fails in several fronts, including the ability to do basic research and know that David Akers isn't one of the lowest paid members of the 49ers team. His assumption the one of the lowest-paid members of the 49ers team would be deciding the game is false.

We regularly interrupt games to go for a ride on the equivalent of Disney's stomach-in-throat Tower of Terror. The scariest words for any fan are "wide right" or "wide left."

This is part of what makes the game of football exciting. The drama and the fact we don't know whether a kick will be made or missed. Because Skip Bayless lacks the basic writing skills of a fifth grader, he is unaware he is making the case for field goal attempts to stay as part of the NFL game. They are exciting and people enjoy them.

This is why I have long proposed a change that will never, ever happen because it makes too much sense. Give place-kicking the boot.

This is typical Skip Bayless reasoning. We are all idiots because we don't agree with his opinion, which is an opinion that Skip Bayless thinks is a really good opinion. We are stupid because we don't agree with Skip Bayless.

That's right, eliminate it.

You are so controversial and relevant in being controversial. Here is some of the attention you desperately crave.

Fourth-and-5 at the opponent's 25? You have to GO FOR IT. And you keep going for it until you score six points or you're stopped. If you score a touchdown, you always go for the far more exciting two-point conversion.

You say too many games would turn into low-scoring defensive turnoffs? Not if the usual conservative field goal chess matches turned into touchdown shootouts.

And apparently Skip is operating under the assumption that more offense and less defense is better for the NFL, which I am not sure is true. NFL fans like to see scoring, but I believe good defense is also appreciated by NFL fans. Skip state he doesn't think the punt should be eliminated from the NFL game, but if he really wants teams to go for it on fourth down then he should suggest the NFL eliminate the punt.

Who's to say Tom Brady wouldn't have gone on to win those three rings with his arm instead of Adam Vinatieri's leg?

Who's to say he would have? What does it matter? The field goal is an important part of the NFL and the game of football.

And if you don't like your fourth-down odds, you can always punt. No, I would not take the foot completely out of football. I'd keep punting, which doesn't directly impact the scoreboard the way field goals do.

This is all you need to know about Skip Bayless. He thinks field goal kickers should be prevented from making a difference in the outcome of a game because they are low-paid and not real football players, but punters don't have a direct impact on the game (even though they do) so they can stay around even though they are also low-paid and not real football players either. So the low-paid players that have an impact on the game should be removed from the game of football, while the low-paid players that don't have an impact on the game should stay in the game of football...all for the sake of making sure highly-paid players are the only ones who decide important NFL games. Skip clearly favors some sort of bizarre wage-related hierarchy in football.

Punting is an underrated art because of the strategy, skill and athleticism involved.

Punting is an underrated art while place-kicking is an overrated skill. If you think Skip Bayless isn't intentionally trying to start an argument by differentiating so wildly between two kicking skills then you don't know Skip Bayless. This is what he does. This is him trolling.

Punters must catch bullet snaps that sometimes bounce or test their verticals. Then they must aim away from dangerous returners or pierce the wind with low spirals or drop punts into "coffin corners" or stick them nose-first like majestic 2-irons near the goal line.

What Skip leaves out is that punters are often among the lowest-paid members of an NFL team and field goal kickers have to deal with bad snaps messing up their timing, opponents trying to block the kick, wind that affects where the football goes after it is kicked, and the pressure that goes with high-pressure kicks that can decide the outcome of the game.

Just let great football players decide games by, you know, playing football.

And again, to sum up Skip's point of view. Field goal kickers are not football players while punters are football players. If you can see how Skip would consider punting a "lost art" and field goal kicking a useless part of football decided by non-athletes then you probably agree with Skip Bayless and should lash yourself with a belt 20 times. 

Alas, the kicker-as-specialist was born. Gogolak launched a parade of soccer refugees who could outkick Groza or Blanda but who had no chance of making the team at any position. See: Garo Yepremian's hilariously disastrous "pass" in Super Bowl VII.

One time a kicker threw a terrible pass in the Super Bowl, so that means the NFL should outlaw the kicker. Skip does realize, and I know he realizes this but he is trolling, that the punter-as-a-specialist was born around this time as well. Punters are a specialized position and they are as much of a specialized, non-athlete group of football players as kickers are.

The AFL's Buffalo Bills signed Gogolak in 1964, obviously angering the football gods. The NFL's Bills paid with eight seconds left in Super Bowl XXV, trailing the New York Giants 20-19. In trotted Norwood, who missed a 47-yarder, the historically infamous Wide Right.

So Gregg Skip Easterbrook Bayless thinks the Bills lost Super Bowl XXV because they angered the football gods by signing the first kicker? If this were true, which is obviously isn't, would this mean the football gods would be angered at other teams who used kickers? Someone tell New England they should have missed those two game-winning field goals in two separate Super Bowls. Any important kick would miss because the wrathful football gods do not want to justify the use of a field goal kicker in any situation.

Just last season, Akers set the NFL's single-season record for field goals, with 44. In this season's opener at Green Bay, Akers tied the NFL record with a 63-yarder.

BUT SKIP BAYLESS WANTS YOU TO REMEMBER THIS DID NOT TAKE TALENT!

He has missed eight of his past 20 field goals, including his only attempt in the NFC Championship Game at Atlanta.

And this kick could have had an impact on the game, thereby justifying the use of a field goal kicker in the NFL. Arguing the NFL should outlaw field goals because they have too much of an impact on the game is like arguing baseball should outlaw closers because they just pitch one inning and can affect the outcome of a game.

His 31 field goals are best in Eagles playoff history. He made an NFL postseason record 19 in a row. Yet in his final Philly playoff game, at home against Green Bay, Akers missed two of three in a 21-16 loss. 

And this is relevant to why the field goal should be outlawed in what way? Skip is essentially arguing Akers is missing too many field goals and so the NFL should outlaw the field goal because we wouldn't want the 49ers to be denied a Super Bowl victory because of him. It's much better the 49ers are denied a Super Bowl appearance if their backup kick returner fumbles the football twice, since the punting game is all about football, while the kicking game is just a bunch of non-talented assholes kicking the ball through posts...which I guess is also the entire premise of soccer, so I wonder Skip's feelings on that sport?

For teammates, too. I've never talked to a position player who liked field goal kicking playing such a crucial role in football.

In that case, Skip Bayless has talked to maybe 1-2 position players in his lifetime. I can't imagine Skip has never talked with a position player who doesn't mind field goal kicking playing a crucial role in football. Of course there may be very few NFL players willing to talk to Bayless, so that may be the reason Skip has this point of view.

Yet kickers sometimes lose it completely, the way golfers do. See: David Duval.

OUTLAW GOLF! IT'S NOT A SPORT AND THE PARTICIPANTS DON'T MAKE ENOUGH MONEY!

So whom did 49ers coach Jim Harbaugh recently sign to compete with Akers and help snap him out of his slump? Billy Cundiff, who was eventually cut by the Ravens after missing a mere 32-yarder, wide left, that cost his teammates a shot at overtime on the road against the New England Patriots in last year's AFC title game.
Absolute madness.

Craziness. Absurdity.

Cundiff kicked pretty well for the Ravens until he missed this field goal, so the fact an NFL team gives him a look isn't completely unforeseen.

(My friend Feely and I bonded six years ago after I outraged him by dismissing kickers as "unathletic little guys." Feely soon made me eat those words by beating me in a 40-yard dash -- the Giants once timed him at 4.6 seconds, he's a scratch golfer and was a soccer star in high school.

Please remember Skip Bayless is basing this entire article that the field goal should be outlawed on the following premise:

So it's all-too-possible gifted warriors will battle their guts out for nearly 60 minutes … only to watch a player who doesn't actually play football trot onto the field and decide the outcome.

and he would keep punting because:

Punting is an underrated art because of the strategy, skill and athleticism involved.

Now Skip is telling us that Jay Feely beat him in a 40-yard dash and was timed at 4.6 in the 40-yard dash. Don't worry, Skip is about to get a whole lot more stupid in making his argument.

He, Akers and Justin Tucker -- a receiver and defensive back at Texas powerhouse Austin Westlake High -- lead the new breed of athletic kickers.

So Skip Bayless is making the argument the Super Bowl could be decided by guys who aren't real football players like David Akers and Justin Tucker, then tells us that Akers and Tucker are the new breed of athletic kicker and Tucker was actually defensive back and receiver in high school. Doesn't this make him a "real" football player in some way? So basically, these guys are real football players who have chosen to kick in the NFL.

Yet even though Feely claims Tom Coughlin once told him he was the Giants' backup backup safety, obviously none of these guys could make it as anything but a kicker.

Well obviously, since it supports your point of view, none of these kickers could do anything but be a kicker in the NFL. A logical person would say they could also be punters, as long as they had the athletic ability to be a punter of course. There is such a huge difference in the athletic ability of a punter and a field goal kicker I bet Feely, Akers or Tucker couldn't cut it as a punter. Nevermind when a team's punter goes down, the non-athlete, non-football playing field goal kicker is usually the backup. This will just serve to ruin Skip's point that field goal kickers have less talent than punters and cause us to dismiss his attempts to troll us all.

Here's the kicker to this insanity: NFL teams won't spend much money and rarely spend high draft picks on what arguably can be the second most valuable player to the quarterback.

Teams also tend not to spend high draft picks on punters, yet they are considered by Skip to be the very essence of a football player. My attempts to argue rationally are going to fail. This is the nature of Skip's trolling. I can poke 100 holes in his argument, but he keeps coming back with a straw man argument and steadily raising his voice while failing to see or acknowledge the inherent contradictions in his thought process. Much of the criticism he has for field goal kickers is also true for punters, but Skip isn't trying to get rid of punting, so he fails to see his arguments for eliminating the field goal kicker can also extend to eliminating the punter. After all, Skip is all about going for it on fourth down and what better way to do that then eliminate the opportunity for a team to punt?

The first "big" free-agent deal awarded a kicker, in 2005, was what it cost Indianapolis to pry Vinatieri away from the Patriots: $3.5 million to sign and $2.5 million a year for three years. Laughably little.

The record contract for a punter (Michael Koenan) is 6 years $19.5 million. Sebastian Janikowski has the record contract for a field goal kicker at 4 years $16 million with $9 million guaranteed. Hey, if Skip can use a small sample size to prove his point, then I can use a small sample size to disprove his point.

Yet this season's average kicker salary is an astonishingly low $1.97 million. Ready for this? Tucker, who nailed the 47-yarder that eliminated Peyton Manning in Denver in overtime, rakes in all of $390,000.

He's an undrafted rookie and if he keeps kicking like he has then he should earning much more money after the next couple of seasons. Also, I wonder what the average salary of a punter is? I'm guessing it wouldn't be much more than $1.97 million, if not less than that amount. But again, Skip wants to throw the punter comparison out there and then no longer compare field goal kickers to punters when it doesn't support his point of view.

Tucker had a rock-solid rookie year -- making 30 of 33 field goals, including 4-of-4 from 50-plus yards. Yet in the third game, at home against New England, what if his last-second chip shot had been correctly called by the replacement ref? On replays it sure looked wide right. How permanently would his psyche have been damaged if his 27-yarder had lost instead of won that game?

Well, based on speculation that supports Skip's point of view, this would ruin Justin Tucker forever and further explain why the field goal must be eliminated from the game of football. Instead in this situation, Joe Flacco should have had to try score a touchdown to win the game, rather than rely on a field goal kick. That's more like the game of football should be to Skip Bayless, even though it never has been that way.

Please, America, stand up and support me on this. At least let's outlaw field goals in the final two minutes or five minutes or in fourth quarters.

How about eliminating field goals between the nine and five minute mark in each quarter? No wait, how about eliminating field goals between the 20 and 23-yard line? How about not allowing a field goal kicker who has missed a field goal attempt earlier in the game to attempt another field goal? What other randomly-placed rules can we think of as related to field goals?

Better still, give 'em the permanent boot. I dread watching Akers go Norwood.

So Skip's basic argument is that he doesn't want to watch a field goal kicker miss a kick. How is this different from a special teams player missing a block and causing one of the uber-athletic punters to have his punt blocked? How is a field goal kicker missing a kick different from a punt returner dropping a punt or not getting out of the way of a punted ball which is recovered by the opposing team? We wouldn't want the field goal kicker to ruin every other more highly-paid player's good work during the game...which is assuming every highly-paid player did good work during the game. Here's a better idea, why don't we give Skip Bayless the boot?